A survey of calf management practices and farmer perceptions of calf housing in UK dairy herds

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Dairy Science Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3168/jds.2021-20638
S.A. Mahendran, D.C. Wathes, R.E. Booth, N. Blackie
{"title":"A survey of calf management practices and farmer perceptions of calf housing in UK dairy herds","authors":"S.A. Mahendran, D.C. Wathes, R.E. Booth, N. Blackie","doi":"10.3168/jds.2021-20638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adoption of optimal management techniques for rearing dairy calves has significant effects on their health, welfare, and productivity. Despite much published literature on best practice, calf morbidity and mortality rates remain high. This survey aimed to establish current calf management practices in the United Kingdom, along with farmer perceptions surrounding different housing types. A survey containing 48 questions was distributed online to UK farmers via social media, online forums, and a convenience sample of veterinary practices and was completed by 216 participants. A descriptive analysis with frequency distributions was calculated, with chi-squared tests, linear regression and multinomial regression performed to assess associations between variables. There was a low level of regular veterinary involvement in day-to-day health decision making for calves (3/216, 1.4%), highlighting the need for appropriate staff training and standard operating procedures to ensure prudent antimicrobial usage. Restricted calf milk feeding remains highly prevalent in the United Kingdom, with most calves fed milk replacer (114/216, 52.8%), twice daily (189/216, 87.5%), initially given milk at 4 L/d (66/216, 30.6%) or 6 L/d (47/216, 21.8%). There was, however, a small number of farmers initially feeding only 2 to 3 L/d (28/216, 13.0%). Euthanasia of bull calves (5/216, 2.3%) and feeding antimicrobial waste milk to calves (8/216, 3.7%) both occurred on some farms. With regard to housing, use of individual calf pens has reduced from around 60% in 2010 to 38.4% in this study (83/216), with this reduction being partly driven by the policy of UK milk buyers. Farmer perceptions indicated that individual housing was thought to help to improve calf health and feed monitoring of calves, suggesting that successful use of group housing requires a higher level of stockmanship. The majority of farmers did not provide fresh bedding to calves on a daily basis (141/216, 65.3%), and relatively few disinfected both the calf housing (38.0%) and ground (47.7%) between calves, suggesting that hygiene practices may require additional attention in farm management protocols.","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":"105 1","pages":"Pages 409-423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030221009917","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Adoption of optimal management techniques for rearing dairy calves has significant effects on their health, welfare, and productivity. Despite much published literature on best practice, calf morbidity and mortality rates remain high. This survey aimed to establish current calf management practices in the United Kingdom, along with farmer perceptions surrounding different housing types. A survey containing 48 questions was distributed online to UK farmers via social media, online forums, and a convenience sample of veterinary practices and was completed by 216 participants. A descriptive analysis with frequency distributions was calculated, with chi-squared tests, linear regression and multinomial regression performed to assess associations between variables. There was a low level of regular veterinary involvement in day-to-day health decision making for calves (3/216, 1.4%), highlighting the need for appropriate staff training and standard operating procedures to ensure prudent antimicrobial usage. Restricted calf milk feeding remains highly prevalent in the United Kingdom, with most calves fed milk replacer (114/216, 52.8%), twice daily (189/216, 87.5%), initially given milk at 4 L/d (66/216, 30.6%) or 6 L/d (47/216, 21.8%). There was, however, a small number of farmers initially feeding only 2 to 3 L/d (28/216, 13.0%). Euthanasia of bull calves (5/216, 2.3%) and feeding antimicrobial waste milk to calves (8/216, 3.7%) both occurred on some farms. With regard to housing, use of individual calf pens has reduced from around 60% in 2010 to 38.4% in this study (83/216), with this reduction being partly driven by the policy of UK milk buyers. Farmer perceptions indicated that individual housing was thought to help to improve calf health and feed monitoring of calves, suggesting that successful use of group housing requires a higher level of stockmanship. The majority of farmers did not provide fresh bedding to calves on a daily basis (141/216, 65.3%), and relatively few disinfected both the calf housing (38.0%) and ground (47.7%) between calves, suggesting that hygiene practices may require additional attention in farm management protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小牛管理的做法和农民的看法小牛住房在英国奶牛群的调查
采用最佳管理技术饲养奶牛犊牛对其健康、福利和生产力有重大影响。尽管发表了许多关于最佳做法的文献,但小牛的发病率和死亡率仍然很高。这项调查旨在建立当前小牛管理实践在英国,随着农民周围的不同住房类型的看法。一项包含48个问题的调查通过社交媒体、在线论坛和方便的兽医实践样本在线分发给英国农民,共有216名参与者完成。计算频率分布的描述性分析,使用卡方检验、线性回归和多项回归来评估变量之间的相关性。兽医在犊牛日常健康决策中的定期参与程度较低(3/216,1.4%),突出表明需要对工作人员进行适当培训和制定标准操作程序,以确保谨慎使用抗微生物药物。限制犊牛奶喂养在英国仍然非常普遍,大多数犊牛每天两次(189/216,87.5%)喂养代乳品(114/216,52.8%),最初以4升/天(66/216,30.6%)或6升/天(47/216,21.8%)喂养。然而,有少数农民最初只投喂2至3升/天(28/216,13.0%)。部分养殖场均发生公犊安乐死(5/216,2.3%)和饲喂抗菌废乳(8/216,3.7%)。在住房方面,个体小牛围栏的使用已经从2010年的60%左右减少到38.4%(83/216),这种减少部分是由英国牛奶买家的政策推动的。农民的看法表明,个人住房被认为有助于改善小牛的健康和对小牛的饲料监测,这表明成功使用群体住房需要更高水平的畜牧业。大多数农民没有每天为小牛提供新鲜的床褥(141/216,65.3%),相对较少的人在犊牛之间对犊牛舍(38.0%)和地面(47.7%)进行消毒,这表明在农场管理方案中可能需要额外注意卫生措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
期刊最新文献
Association of phenotypic traits and fertility in Holstein heifers: Body condition score, body weight, antral follicle count, Anti-Müllerian hormone, and anogenital distance. Cullin3 mitigates NEFA-induced oxidative stress in mammary epithelial cells: involvement of BCL2/BECN1 and autophagy. Effect of a novel bacterial 6-phytase on nutrient digestibility in lactating dairy cows. Evaluation of a fully automated 2-dimensional imaging system for real-time cattle lameness detection using machine learning. Meta-analysis to determine the effects of supplementation of niacin during the transition or lactating period on performance in dairy cows.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1