Event-related correlations in learning impaired children during A hybrid go/no-go choice reaction visual-motor task.

Jurriaan M Peters, Deborah P Waber, Gloria B McAnulty, Frank H Duffy
{"title":"Event-related correlations in learning impaired children during A hybrid go/no-go choice reaction visual-motor task.","authors":"Jurriaan M Peters,&nbsp;Deborah P Waber,&nbsp;Gloria B McAnulty,&nbsp;Frank H Duffy","doi":"10.1177/155005940303400304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One hundred sixty-nine learning impaired (LI) and 71 non-learning impaired (NLI) children underwent a hybrid go/no-go choice reaction time visual-motor task to study the behavioral and physiological fundamentals of learning disorders. A left button was pressed for Left Arrow (LA) stimuli, a right for Right Arrow (RA) stimuli, none (no-go) for a non-directional arrow. Stimulus specific visual evoked potentials were formed and, with PZ as index electrode, were lag-correlated to frontal electrodes to form Event-Related Correlations (ERC). Exploratory t-statistic significance probability maps (t-SPM) were used to define regions of interest (ROI). Behaviorally, there was a right-hand advantage over the left in the NLI group, but less in the LI group. Electrophysiologically, RA and LA conditions increased correlation between visual areas (PZ) and contralateral frontal areas (F3 and F4). A unilateral ROI, at electrode FC1, also preceded both left- and right-handed responses. Neurobehaviorally, increased visual-motor correlation was associated with better performance, especially for the left hemisphere, at F3 and FC1. Surprisingly, visual-motor correlations were not associated with performance for the NLI group in the RA and no-go condition. Our data support previously reported difficulties of learning impaired children in low-level information processing. Furthermore, we hypothesize that LI, in contrast to NLI children, demonstrate difficulty in automatizing routine tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":75713,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)","volume":"34 3","pages":"99-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/155005940303400304","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940303400304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

One hundred sixty-nine learning impaired (LI) and 71 non-learning impaired (NLI) children underwent a hybrid go/no-go choice reaction time visual-motor task to study the behavioral and physiological fundamentals of learning disorders. A left button was pressed for Left Arrow (LA) stimuli, a right for Right Arrow (RA) stimuli, none (no-go) for a non-directional arrow. Stimulus specific visual evoked potentials were formed and, with PZ as index electrode, were lag-correlated to frontal electrodes to form Event-Related Correlations (ERC). Exploratory t-statistic significance probability maps (t-SPM) were used to define regions of interest (ROI). Behaviorally, there was a right-hand advantage over the left in the NLI group, but less in the LI group. Electrophysiologically, RA and LA conditions increased correlation between visual areas (PZ) and contralateral frontal areas (F3 and F4). A unilateral ROI, at electrode FC1, also preceded both left- and right-handed responses. Neurobehaviorally, increased visual-motor correlation was associated with better performance, especially for the left hemisphere, at F3 and FC1. Surprisingly, visual-motor correlations were not associated with performance for the NLI group in the RA and no-go condition. Our data support previously reported difficulties of learning impaired children in low-level information processing. Furthermore, we hypothesize that LI, in contrast to NLI children, demonstrate difficulty in automatizing routine tasks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习障碍儿童在“去/不去”混合选择反应视觉-运动任务中的事件相关。
169名学习障碍儿童(LI)和71名非学习障碍儿童(NLI)接受了一项混合选择反应时间视觉运动任务,以研究学习障碍的行为和生理基础。左箭头(LA)刺激按左键,右箭头(RA)刺激按右键,非方向箭头不按(no-go)。形成刺激特异性视觉诱发电位,以PZ为指数电极,与额叶电极滞后相关,形成事件相关(event - associated Correlations, ERC)。探索性t统计显著性概率图(t-SPM)用于定义感兴趣区域(ROI)。在行为学上,非语言组的右撇子比左撇子有优势,而非语言组的右撇子比左撇子少。电生理上,RA和LA条件增加了视觉区(PZ)和对侧额叶区(F3和F4)之间的相关性。电极FC1的单侧ROI也先于左手和右手反应。在神经行为方面,视觉-运动相关性的增加与更好的表现有关,尤其是左半球F3和FC1。令人惊讶的是,在RA和no-go条件下,NLI组的视觉-运动相关性与表现无关。我们的数据支持先前报道的学习障碍儿童在低水平信息处理方面的困难。此外,我们假设与非语言儿童相比,非语言儿童在自动化日常任务方面表现出困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brain Death Effects on EEG of Drugs and Toxic Substances Disorders of Consciousness Neuromonitoring and Emergency EEG EEG Signal Acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1