Some antiepileptic compounds impair learning by rats in a Morris water maze.

James D Churchill, Pei-Chun Fang, Steven E Voss, Joyce Besheer, Annette L Herron, Preston E Garraghty
{"title":"Some antiepileptic compounds impair learning by rats in a Morris water maze.","authors":"James D Churchill,&nbsp;Pei-Chun Fang,&nbsp;Steven E Voss,&nbsp;Joyce Besheer,&nbsp;Annette L Herron,&nbsp;Preston E Garraghty","doi":"10.1007/BF02688828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present experiments, we investigated the effects of several commonly employed antiepileptic drugs on the performance of adult rats in a Morris water maze task. We found that phenytoin treatment produced the most deleterious performance impairments across all days of training, and that these performance deficits are not likely due to any general sensorimotor impairments. Carbamazepine had milder, but detectable negative effects, as carbamazepine-treated animals exhibited initial acquisition deficits, but rapidly achieved escape levels comparable to controls. In marked contrast, valproate and ethosuximide had no detectable effects on learning in the water maze. These results parallel previous findings in rats treated with these compounds and tested in an instrumental learning task, and are in general agreement with the human clinical literature. To the extent that one might wish to minimize learning deficits associated with maintenance on antiepileptic drugs, phenytoin is definitely not the treatment of choice, while valproate or ethosuximide are apparently much less disruptive.</p>","PeriodicalId":73397,"journal":{"name":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02688828","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02688828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In the present experiments, we investigated the effects of several commonly employed antiepileptic drugs on the performance of adult rats in a Morris water maze task. We found that phenytoin treatment produced the most deleterious performance impairments across all days of training, and that these performance deficits are not likely due to any general sensorimotor impairments. Carbamazepine had milder, but detectable negative effects, as carbamazepine-treated animals exhibited initial acquisition deficits, but rapidly achieved escape levels comparable to controls. In marked contrast, valproate and ethosuximide had no detectable effects on learning in the water maze. These results parallel previous findings in rats treated with these compounds and tested in an instrumental learning task, and are in general agreement with the human clinical literature. To the extent that one might wish to minimize learning deficits associated with maintenance on antiepileptic drugs, phenytoin is definitely not the treatment of choice, while valproate or ethosuximide are apparently much less disruptive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在莫里斯水迷宫中,一些抗癫痫化合物损害了老鼠的学习能力。
在本实验中,我们研究了几种常用的抗癫痫药物对成年大鼠Morris水迷宫任务表现的影响。我们发现,苯妥英治疗在训练的所有日子里产生了最有害的表现障碍,这些表现障碍不太可能是由于任何一般的感觉运动障碍。卡马西平有轻微的,但可检测到的负面影响,因为卡马西平治疗的动物表现出最初的习得缺陷,但迅速达到与对照组相当的逃逸水平。相反,丙戊酸盐和乙砜胺对水迷宫的学习没有明显的影响。这些结果与先前用这些化合物治疗的大鼠并在工具性学习任务中进行测试的结果相似,并且与人类临床文献大体一致。在某种程度上,人们可能希望最小化与抗癫痫药物维持相关的学习缺陷,苯妥英绝对不是治疗的选择,而丙戊酸盐或乙氧亚胺显然破坏性小得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editor’s note Editorial comment Editorial comment Editorial commentary Culture-brain interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1