Critical analysis of old and new vaccines against N. meningitidis serogroup C, considering the meningococcal disease epidemiology in Brazil.

Revista do Hospital das Clinicas Pub Date : 2003-07-01 Epub Date: 2003-09-30 DOI:10.1590/s0041-87812003000400009
Lucia Ferro Bricks
{"title":"Critical analysis of old and new vaccines against N. meningitidis serogroup C, considering the meningococcal disease epidemiology in Brazil.","authors":"Lucia Ferro Bricks","doi":"10.1590/s0041-87812003000400009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Worldwide, the impact of meningococcal disease is substantial, and the potential for the introduction and spread of more virulent strains of N. meningitidis or strains with increased resistance to current antibiotics causes concern, making prevention essential.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Review the indications for meningococcal disease vaccines, considering the epidemiological status in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A critical literature review on this issue using the Medline and Lilacs databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Brazil, MenB and MenC were the most important serogroups identified in the 1990s. Polysaccharide vaccines available against those serogroups can offer only limited protection for infants, the group at highest risk for meningococcal disease. Additionally, polysaccharide vaccines may induce a hypo-responsive state to MenC. New meningococcal C conjugate vaccines could partially solve these problems, but it is unlikely that in the next few years a vaccine against MenB that can promote good protection against multiple strains of MenB responsible for endemic and epidemic diseases will become available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In order to make the best decision about recommendations on immunization practices, better quality surveillance data are required. In Brazil, MenC was responsible for about 2,000 cases per year during the last 10 years. New conjugate vaccines against MenC are very effective and immunogenic, and they should be recommended, especially for children less than 5 years old. Polysaccharide vaccines should be indicated only in epidemic situations and for high-risk groups. Until new vaccines against MenC and MenB are available for routine immunization programs, the most important measure for controlling meningococcal disease is early diagnosis of these infections in order to treat patients and to offer chemoprophylaxis to contacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":76453,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Hospital das Clinicas","volume":"58 4","pages":"231-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s0041-87812003000400009","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Hospital das Clinicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0041-87812003000400009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2003/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Unlabelled: Worldwide, the impact of meningococcal disease is substantial, and the potential for the introduction and spread of more virulent strains of N. meningitidis or strains with increased resistance to current antibiotics causes concern, making prevention essential.

Objectives: Review the indications for meningococcal disease vaccines, considering the epidemiological status in Brazil.

Methods: A critical literature review on this issue using the Medline and Lilacs databases.

Results: In Brazil, MenB and MenC were the most important serogroups identified in the 1990s. Polysaccharide vaccines available against those serogroups can offer only limited protection for infants, the group at highest risk for meningococcal disease. Additionally, polysaccharide vaccines may induce a hypo-responsive state to MenC. New meningococcal C conjugate vaccines could partially solve these problems, but it is unlikely that in the next few years a vaccine against MenB that can promote good protection against multiple strains of MenB responsible for endemic and epidemic diseases will become available.

Conclusions: In order to make the best decision about recommendations on immunization practices, better quality surveillance data are required. In Brazil, MenC was responsible for about 2,000 cases per year during the last 10 years. New conjugate vaccines against MenC are very effective and immunogenic, and they should be recommended, especially for children less than 5 years old. Polysaccharide vaccines should be indicated only in epidemic situations and for high-risk groups. Until new vaccines against MenC and MenB are available for routine immunization programs, the most important measure for controlling meningococcal disease is early diagnosis of these infections in order to treat patients and to offer chemoprophylaxis to contacts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑到巴西脑膜炎球菌病流行病学,针对C组脑膜炎奈瑟菌的新旧疫苗的关键分析
未标明:在世界范围内,脑膜炎球菌病的影响是巨大的,更强毒力的脑膜炎奈索菌菌株或对当前抗生素耐药性增强的菌株的传入和传播的可能性令人担忧,因此预防至关重要。目的:回顾脑膜炎球菌病疫苗的适应症,考虑到巴西的流行病学状况。方法:利用Medline和Lilacs数据库对相关文献进行综述。结果:在巴西,MenB和MenC是20世纪90年代发现的最重要的血清群。针对这些血清群的多糖疫苗只能为婴儿提供有限的保护,而婴儿是脑膜炎球菌病风险最高的群体。此外,多糖疫苗可能诱导对MenC的低反应状态。新的C型脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗可以部分解决这些问题,但是在未来几年内,不太可能出现一种针对b型脑膜炎球菌的疫苗,这种疫苗可以促进对导致地方性和流行病的多种b型脑膜炎球菌菌株的良好保护。结论:为了对免疫实践建议做出最佳决策,需要更高质量的监测数据。在巴西,MenC在过去10年中每年造成约2000例病例。针对MenC的新型结合疫苗非常有效且具有免疫原性,应推荐使用,特别是5岁以下儿童。多糖疫苗只适用于流行病和高危人群。在针对MenC和MenB的新疫苗可用于常规免疫规划之前,控制脑膜炎球菌病的最重要措施是对这些感染进行早期诊断,以便对患者进行治疗并向接触者提供化学预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fetal programming and future disease. Retrospective evaluation of bone pain palliation after samarium-153-EDTMP therapy. Hypertension in employees of a University General Hospital. Adverse life events and coping skills in panic disorder. Human identification and analysis of DNA in bones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1