From the operating room of the present to the operating room of the future. Human-factors lessons learned from the minimally invasive surgery revolution.

Anthony G Gallagher, C Daniel Smith
{"title":"From the operating room of the present to the operating room of the future. Human-factors lessons learned from the minimally invasive surgery revolution.","authors":"Anthony G Gallagher,&nbsp;C Daniel Smith","doi":"10.1177/107155170301000306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The minimally invasive surgical revolution has changed the way surgery is practiced. It has also helped surgical innovators to break the tethers that anchored the practice of surgery in an early 20th century operating room environment. To some in surgery, the Operating Room of the Future will be seen as a revolution but to others, an inevitable evolution of the changes ushered in by the adoption of minimally invasive surgery. Although minimally invasive surgery has conferred considerable advantages on the patient, it has imposed significant difficulties on the surgeon, which in turn, have impacted outcomes. These difficulties were primarily human factor in nature and were poorly understood by critical groups such as device manufacturers, surgeons, and surgery educators and trainers. This article details what these human factors were, how they related to the practice of minimally invasive surgery, and how they will impact on the practice of surgery in the Operating Room of the Future. Much of the technology for the Operating Room of the Future currently exists (eg, surgical robotics, virtual reality, and telemedicine). However, for it to function optimally it must be integrated in a fashion that takes on board the human factor strengths and limitations of the surgeon. These advanced technologies should then be harnessed to optimize surgical practice. In some cases, this will involve rethinking existing technologies (ie, three-dimensional camera systems), applying technologies that currently exist in a manner that is more systematic and better managed (ie, surgical robots and virtual reality), and a reconsideration of who should be applying these technologies for the practice of surgery in the 21st century. In all cases, there will be education and training implications for the practitioner. Lastly, there must be unequivocal demonstration that these changes bring about positive benefits for patients in terms of better outcomes and for surgeons in terms of ability and ease of doing their job. After the experiences of the last decade with minimally invasive surgery, the Operating Room of the Future should be seen as a well-grounded evolution, not a revolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":79535,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in laparoscopic surgery","volume":"10 3","pages":"127-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/107155170301000306","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in laparoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/107155170301000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

The minimally invasive surgical revolution has changed the way surgery is practiced. It has also helped surgical innovators to break the tethers that anchored the practice of surgery in an early 20th century operating room environment. To some in surgery, the Operating Room of the Future will be seen as a revolution but to others, an inevitable evolution of the changes ushered in by the adoption of minimally invasive surgery. Although minimally invasive surgery has conferred considerable advantages on the patient, it has imposed significant difficulties on the surgeon, which in turn, have impacted outcomes. These difficulties were primarily human factor in nature and were poorly understood by critical groups such as device manufacturers, surgeons, and surgery educators and trainers. This article details what these human factors were, how they related to the practice of minimally invasive surgery, and how they will impact on the practice of surgery in the Operating Room of the Future. Much of the technology for the Operating Room of the Future currently exists (eg, surgical robotics, virtual reality, and telemedicine). However, for it to function optimally it must be integrated in a fashion that takes on board the human factor strengths and limitations of the surgeon. These advanced technologies should then be harnessed to optimize surgical practice. In some cases, this will involve rethinking existing technologies (ie, three-dimensional camera systems), applying technologies that currently exist in a manner that is more systematic and better managed (ie, surgical robots and virtual reality), and a reconsideration of who should be applying these technologies for the practice of surgery in the 21st century. In all cases, there will be education and training implications for the practitioner. Lastly, there must be unequivocal demonstration that these changes bring about positive benefits for patients in terms of better outcomes and for surgeons in terms of ability and ease of doing their job. After the experiences of the last decade with minimally invasive surgery, the Operating Room of the Future should be seen as a well-grounded evolution, not a revolution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从现在的手术室到未来的手术室。从微创手术革命中吸取的人为因素教训。
微创手术革命已经改变了手术的实践方式。它还帮助外科创新者打破了20世纪早期手术室环境中固定手术实践的束缚。对于一些从事外科手术的人来说,未来的手术室将被视为一场革命,但对另一些人来说,这是采用微创手术所带来的不可避免的变革。尽管微创手术给患者带来了相当大的优势,但它也给外科医生带来了很大的困难,这反过来又影响了结果。这些困难本质上主要是人为因素,而设备制造商、外科医生、外科教育者和培训师等关键群体对这些困难知之甚少。本文详细介绍了这些人为因素是什么,它们与微创手术实践的关系,以及它们将如何影响未来手术室的手术实践。未来手术室的许多技术目前都已经存在(例如,手术机器人、虚拟现实和远程医疗)。然而,为了使其发挥最佳功能,它必须以一种结合人为因素优势和外科医生局限性的方式进行整合。这些先进的技术应该被用来优化外科实践。在某些情况下,这将涉及重新思考现有技术(如三维摄像系统),以更系统化和更好管理的方式应用目前存在的技术(如手术机器人和虚拟现实),并重新考虑谁应该在21世纪将这些技术应用于手术实践。在所有情况下,都会对从业者产生教育和培训影响。最后,必须有明确的证据表明,这些变化为患者带来了更好的结果,为外科医生的能力和工作便利性带来了积极的好处。在经历了过去十年的微创手术之后,未来的手术室应该被视为一种有充分根据的进化,而不是一场革命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concluding Remarks. Clinical value of intra-operative ultrasonography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Minimally invasive esophageal resection. The massive hiatal hernia: dealing with the defect. The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1