Summary of the findings from the exposure assessments for metalworking fluid mortality and morbidity studies.

Susan R Woskie, M Abbas Virji, Marilyn Hallock, Thomas J Smith, S Katharine Hammond
{"title":"Summary of the findings from the exposure assessments for metalworking fluid mortality and morbidity studies.","authors":"Susan R Woskie,&nbsp;M Abbas Virji,&nbsp;Marilyn Hallock,&nbsp;Thomas J Smith,&nbsp;S Katharine Hammond","doi":"10.1080/10473220390237377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1985, a number of North American researchers have evaluated the association between worker exposure to metalworking fluids (MWFs) and cancer mortality or respiratory morbidity. The studies have used different methods to measure the MWF aerosol concentration and to evaluate the exposures to the specific components of the MWF aerosol (bacteria, endotoxin, elements, metals, ethanolamines, polyaromatic hydrocarbons). This diversity of approaches makes comparison of study results difficult and has impeded the development of an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for metalworking fluids. This article summarizes the exposures measured in these North American epidemiologic studies by estimating their thoracic and inhalable MWF particulate levels. In addition, issues that must be resolved before a universal sampling and analysis method for MWF can be recommended are reviewed, including: the use of gravimetric versus extractable analysis; whether the analytical limit of detection can support a lower occupational exposure limit; if the volatile components of mineral oils should also be collected; and whether there are components of specific concern in MWFs that should be regulated separately. Finally, recommendations for future directions in MWF exposure assessment and control are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":8182,"journal":{"name":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","volume":"18 11","pages":"855-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10473220390237377","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10473220390237377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Since 1985, a number of North American researchers have evaluated the association between worker exposure to metalworking fluids (MWFs) and cancer mortality or respiratory morbidity. The studies have used different methods to measure the MWF aerosol concentration and to evaluate the exposures to the specific components of the MWF aerosol (bacteria, endotoxin, elements, metals, ethanolamines, polyaromatic hydrocarbons). This diversity of approaches makes comparison of study results difficult and has impeded the development of an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for metalworking fluids. This article summarizes the exposures measured in these North American epidemiologic studies by estimating their thoracic and inhalable MWF particulate levels. In addition, issues that must be resolved before a universal sampling and analysis method for MWF can be recommended are reviewed, including: the use of gravimetric versus extractable analysis; whether the analytical limit of detection can support a lower occupational exposure limit; if the volatile components of mineral oils should also be collected; and whether there are components of specific concern in MWFs that should be regulated separately. Finally, recommendations for future directions in MWF exposure assessment and control are suggested.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金属加工液死亡率和发病率研究接触评估结果摘要。
自1985年以来,一些北美研究人员评估了工人接触金属加工液(MWFs)与癌症死亡率或呼吸道疾病之间的关系。这些研究使用了不同的方法来测量MWF气溶胶浓度,并评估接触MWF气溶胶的特定成分(细菌、内毒素、元素、金属、乙醇胺、多芳烃)的情况。这种方法的多样性使得比较研究结果变得困难,并阻碍了金属加工液职业接触限值(OEL)的发展。本文总结了这些北美流行病学研究中测量的暴露量,估计了他们的胸部和可吸入的MWF颗粒水平。此外,还审查了在推荐一种通用的MWF取样和分析方法之前必须解决的问题,包括:重量法与可提取分析的使用;分析检出限是否能支持较低的职业暴露限值;如果矿物油的挥发性成分也应收集;以及MWFs中是否有需要特别关注的成分需要单独监管。最后,对今后MWF暴露评价与控制的发展方向提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Field Evaluation of Mandelic Acid in Urine as a Compliance Monitor for Styrene Exposure The Impact of Boundary Layer Separation on Local Exhaust Design and Worker Exposure Air-Lead Particle Sizes in Battery Manufacturing: Potential Effects on the OSHA Compliance Model Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the ACGIH and the EPA Industrial Ventilation News Digest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1