Social status and the secondary sex ratio: new evidence on a lingering controversy.

Lee Ellis, Steven Bonin
{"title":"Social status and the secondary sex ratio: new evidence on a lingering controversy.","authors":"Lee Ellis,&nbsp;Steven Bonin","doi":"10.1080/19485565.2002.9989047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because women are more likely than men to use social status as a criterion in mate selection, evolutionary theory has led to the hypothesis that higher proportions of males will be born to parents of high social status than to parents of low status. To date, the research that has tested this deduction has not provided consistent support. This could be partly due to the small sample size in several of the studies. The present study tested the hypothesis using 6 different social status measures provided by more than 11,000 United States and Canadian college students. The offspring sex ratio was measured by asking the students their own sex plus that of each of their siblings. No evidence was found to support the hypothesis that parental social status has any significant effect on the sex ratio of offspring.</p>","PeriodicalId":76544,"journal":{"name":"Social biology","volume":"49 1-2","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19485565.2002.9989047","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2002.9989047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Because women are more likely than men to use social status as a criterion in mate selection, evolutionary theory has led to the hypothesis that higher proportions of males will be born to parents of high social status than to parents of low status. To date, the research that has tested this deduction has not provided consistent support. This could be partly due to the small sample size in several of the studies. The present study tested the hypothesis using 6 different social status measures provided by more than 11,000 United States and Canadian college students. The offspring sex ratio was measured by asking the students their own sex plus that of each of their siblings. No evidence was found to support the hypothesis that parental social status has any significant effect on the sex ratio of offspring.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会地位和第二性别比例:一个挥之不去的争议的新证据。
因为女性比男性更倾向于把社会地位作为选择配偶的标准,进化理论提出了这样的假设:社会地位高的父母所生的男孩比社会地位低的父母所生的男孩比例更高。迄今为止,检验这一推论的研究并没有提供一致的支持。这可能部分是由于几项研究的样本量较小。目前的研究通过对11,000多名美国和加拿大大学生提供的6种不同的社会地位测量来验证这一假设。后代的性别比例是通过询问学生自己的性别和他们每个兄弟姐妹的性别来测量的。没有证据支持父母的社会地位对后代性别比例有显著影响的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Size‐dependent reproductive success in Gambian men: Does height or weight matter more? Introduction to Part II Fatherhood history and later life health and mortality in England and Wales: A record linkage study Men's life course trajectories: Exploring the differences by cohort and social class The marriage squeeze in Colombia, 1973–2005: The role of excess male death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1