Determination of vital status at the end of the DIG trial

Joseph F Collins Sc.D. , Cindy L Howell , R.Anne Horney
{"title":"Determination of vital status at the end of the DIG trial","authors":"Joseph F Collins Sc.D. ,&nbsp;Cindy L Howell ,&nbsp;R.Anne Horney","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial was a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial whose primary objective was to determine whether digoxin had beneficial, harmful, or no effect on total mortality in patients with heart failure who were in sinus rhythm and whose ejection fraction was ⩽0.45. The study was designed as a large simple trial with a large number of centers (302) in the United States and Canada, many of which were inexperienced in research. To ensure that the results of the trial would be reported accurately without possible bias due to missing data, the study leadership decided that no outcome results would be reported until the vital status at the end of the study was known for at least 97% of the study participants. Planning for closeout of the study began a year prior to the common end date of December 31, 1995 and included plans for obtaining vital status on December 31, 1995. Participants were given postcards at their final study visit to be completed and mailed on or after January 1, 1996. Of 5602 postcards distributed, 5070 (90.5%) were completed and returned. A contract search agency was hired to locate the remaining participants. Of the total 7788 participants entered into the DIG trial, only 97 participants (1.2%) could not have their vital status as of December 31, 1995 determined. It is recommended that investigators having an outcome measure with a common end date include plans in their protocols for obtaining their measures and activate those plans as early as possible during the course of the study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72706,"journal":{"name":"Controlled clinical trials","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 726-730"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.011","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Controlled clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245603001351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial was a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial whose primary objective was to determine whether digoxin had beneficial, harmful, or no effect on total mortality in patients with heart failure who were in sinus rhythm and whose ejection fraction was ⩽0.45. The study was designed as a large simple trial with a large number of centers (302) in the United States and Canada, many of which were inexperienced in research. To ensure that the results of the trial would be reported accurately without possible bias due to missing data, the study leadership decided that no outcome results would be reported until the vital status at the end of the study was known for at least 97% of the study participants. Planning for closeout of the study began a year prior to the common end date of December 31, 1995 and included plans for obtaining vital status on December 31, 1995. Participants were given postcards at their final study visit to be completed and mailed on or after January 1, 1996. Of 5602 postcards distributed, 5070 (90.5%) were completed and returned. A contract search agency was hired to locate the remaining participants. Of the total 7788 participants entered into the DIG trial, only 97 participants (1.2%) could not have their vital status as of December 31, 1995 determined. It is recommended that investigators having an outcome measure with a common end date include plans in their protocols for obtaining their measures and activate those plans as early as possible during the course of the study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在DIG试验结束时确定生命状态
洋地黄研究组(DIG)试验是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,其主要目的是确定地高辛对处于窦性心律且射血分数≥0.45的心力衰竭患者的总死亡率是否有有益、有害或无影响。该研究被设计为一项大型简单试验,在美国和加拿大有大量中心(302个),其中许多中心在研究方面缺乏经验。为了确保准确报告试验结果而不会因数据缺失而产生偏差,研究领导决定,在至少97%的研究参与者知道研究结束时的重要状态之前,不报告任何结果。研究结束的计划在1995年12月31日共同结束日期之前一年开始,其中包括在1995年12月31日取得重要地位的计划。参与者在他们最后一次研究访问时收到明信片,这些明信片将在1996年1月1日或之后寄出。在分发的5602张明信片中,有5070张(90.5%)已完成并退回。雇佣了一家合同搜索机构来寻找剩下的参与者。在参加DIG试验的7788名参与者中,只有97名参与者(1.2%)在1995年12月31日无法确定其生命状况。建议具有共同结束日期的结果测量的研究者在其方案中包括获得测量的计划,并在研究过程中尽早激活这些计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an international trial of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1