The use of electronic messages to promote seat belt use. Report of a pilot study in Wisconsin.

Michael A Burayidi
{"title":"The use of electronic messages to promote seat belt use. Report of a pilot study in Wisconsin.","authors":"Michael A Burayidi","doi":"10.1076/icsp.10.4.257.16781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The top-ten leading causes of death in the U.S. are related to behavioral risk factors (National Center for Health Statistics, 2000). Deaths from automobile accidents rank in the top-ten list, and driving without the use of seat belts ranks high as a major cause of death within this category. For example, about 60% of the deaths in motor vehicle accidents occur to those who do not wear seat belts. In 2002 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recorded the highest seat belt use rates of 74% in the country. This is the highest since the study began in 1994. The seat belt use rates, however, vary from one region of the country to the other. NHTSA attributes this to differences in state laws requiring use of seat belts. Overall, states with primary seat belt laws such as California, Maryland and Oregon record the highest rates (80%) of seat belt use while states with secondary seat belt laws record the lowest use rates (69%). While generally acknowledging that the use of seat belts saves lives, civil libertarians argue that primary seat belt use laws infringe on individual freedoms and privacy. Others argue that such laws give too much power to police. Because of these reasons, other ways besides the passage of primary seat belt laws must be found to increase seat belt use rates that do not infringe too much on the privacy rights of individuals. The use of electronic message boards by police officers may be the answer to such a strategy. The Wisconsin pilot study bears this out.","PeriodicalId":84914,"journal":{"name":"Injury control and safety promotion","volume":"10 4","pages":"257-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1076/icsp.10.4.257.16781","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury control and safety promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1076/icsp.10.4.257.16781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The top-ten leading causes of death in the U.S. are related to behavioral risk factors (National Center for Health Statistics, 2000). Deaths from automobile accidents rank in the top-ten list, and driving without the use of seat belts ranks high as a major cause of death within this category. For example, about 60% of the deaths in motor vehicle accidents occur to those who do not wear seat belts. In 2002 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recorded the highest seat belt use rates of 74% in the country. This is the highest since the study began in 1994. The seat belt use rates, however, vary from one region of the country to the other. NHTSA attributes this to differences in state laws requiring use of seat belts. Overall, states with primary seat belt laws such as California, Maryland and Oregon record the highest rates (80%) of seat belt use while states with secondary seat belt laws record the lowest use rates (69%). While generally acknowledging that the use of seat belts saves lives, civil libertarians argue that primary seat belt use laws infringe on individual freedoms and privacy. Others argue that such laws give too much power to police. Because of these reasons, other ways besides the passage of primary seat belt laws must be found to increase seat belt use rates that do not infringe too much on the privacy rights of individuals. The use of electronic message boards by police officers may be the answer to such a strategy. The Wisconsin pilot study bears this out.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用电子讯息推广使用安全带。威斯康星州试点研究报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using an electronic medical record system to describe injury epidemiology and health care utilization at an inner-city hospital in Indiana. Skiing and snowboarding injuries and their impact on the emergency care system in South Tyrol: a restrospective analysis for the winter season 2001--2002. School backpack weights: a survey of students in Ghana, Guatemala and the USA. Patient payment for emergency medical services treatment and its impact on injury control: an Alberta case. International collaborative effort on injury statistics: 10-year review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1