Inhibition of (-)-propranolol hydrochloride by its enantiomer in white mice.

R M Kuzeff, M N Topashka-Ancheva, R P Mecheva
{"title":"Inhibition of (-)-propranolol hydrochloride by its enantiomer in white mice.","authors":"R M Kuzeff,&nbsp;M N Topashka-Ancheva,&nbsp;R P Mecheva","doi":"10.1159/000075884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study is based on the hypothesis, that the toxic or physiological effects of an optical isomer may be counteracted or reversed by the administration of a potentized preparation of one of its stereoisomers. In the present study the enantiomer was used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>154 ICR conventional mice were used. 77 mice were administered (R)-(+)-propranolol HCl homeopathic potency prior to and during the experiment, and the other 77 were administered indistinguishable placebo. On the day of the experiment the mice were sedated with intraperitoneal Rometar. Once sedated they were injected intraperitoneally with the LD50 dose of (S)-(-)-propranolol HCl.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The end point for statistical analysis was the difference in survival between the placebo and treatment mice. The odds ratio for survival of treatment mice relative to placebo mice was 1.64. The hypothesis of equal survival proportions gave a chi-square of 2.0916 (1 degree of freedom), which has a p-value of 0.1481. The analysis was then adjusted for mouse weight and intraperitoneal (-)-propranolol dosage using a logistic regression (LR) model. The LR treatment odds ratio was 2.017 and the LR treatment chi-square was 2.8864 (1 degree of freedom), which has a p-value of 0.0893. Consequently we accept the null hypothesis of no treatment effect on survival. The odds ratio estimates show that the treatment mice are 2.02 times more likely to survive than placebo mice, but this was not statistically significant with p = 0.089. Nine percent more treatment mice survived than placebo mice. The investigators accustomed to handling rodents noted that mouse recovery seemed substantially faster in the treatment mice than in the placebo mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":80278,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","volume":"10 6","pages":"309-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000075884","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000075884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: This study is based on the hypothesis, that the toxic or physiological effects of an optical isomer may be counteracted or reversed by the administration of a potentized preparation of one of its stereoisomers. In the present study the enantiomer was used.

Methods: 154 ICR conventional mice were used. 77 mice were administered (R)-(+)-propranolol HCl homeopathic potency prior to and during the experiment, and the other 77 were administered indistinguishable placebo. On the day of the experiment the mice were sedated with intraperitoneal Rometar. Once sedated they were injected intraperitoneally with the LD50 dose of (S)-(-)-propranolol HCl.

Results: The end point for statistical analysis was the difference in survival between the placebo and treatment mice. The odds ratio for survival of treatment mice relative to placebo mice was 1.64. The hypothesis of equal survival proportions gave a chi-square of 2.0916 (1 degree of freedom), which has a p-value of 0.1481. The analysis was then adjusted for mouse weight and intraperitoneal (-)-propranolol dosage using a logistic regression (LR) model. The LR treatment odds ratio was 2.017 and the LR treatment chi-square was 2.8864 (1 degree of freedom), which has a p-value of 0.0893. Consequently we accept the null hypothesis of no treatment effect on survival. The odds ratio estimates show that the treatment mice are 2.02 times more likely to survive than placebo mice, but this was not statistically significant with p = 0.089. Nine percent more treatment mice survived than placebo mice. The investigators accustomed to handling rodents noted that mouse recovery seemed substantially faster in the treatment mice than in the placebo mice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盐酸(-)-心得安对映体对小鼠的抑制作用。
背景:本研究基于这样一种假设,即光学异构体的毒性或生理作用可以通过施用其其中一种立体异构体的增强制剂来抵消或逆转。在本研究中使用了对映体。方法:采用ICR常规小鼠154只。77只小鼠在实验前和实验中被给予(R)-(+)-心得安HCl顺势疗法效力,另外77只小鼠被给予难以区分的安慰剂。在实验当天,小鼠腹腔注射罗米达镇静。镇静后,腹腔注射LD50剂量的盐酸(S)-(-)-心得安。结果:统计学分析的终点是安慰剂组和治疗组小鼠的生存差异。治疗组小鼠与安慰剂组小鼠的生存优势比为1.64。等生存比例假设的卡方为2.0916(1个自由度),p值为0.1481。然后使用逻辑回归(LR)模型对小鼠体重和(-)-普萘洛尔腹腔注射剂量进行校正。LR处理优势比为2.017,LR处理卡方为2.8864(1自由度),p值为0.0893。因此,我们接受治疗对生存无影响的零假设。比值比估计显示,治疗小鼠的存活率是安慰剂小鼠的2.02倍,但p = 0.089,这在统计学上并不显著。治疗小鼠的存活率比安慰剂小鼠高9%。习惯于处理啮齿动物的研究人员注意到,治疗小鼠的恢复似乎比安慰剂小鼠快得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open trial to assess aspects of safety and efficacy of a combined herbal cough syrup with ivy and thyme. [Reduction of endogenous regulation in internal medicine patients]. [Intravenous oxygen therapy increases the activity of the antioxidative and antiatherogenic serum enzyme paraoxonase 1]. Patients' expectations about the benefit of antibiotic treatment: lessons from a randomised controlled trial. Biomedical evidence of influence of geopathic zones on the human body: scientifically traceable effects and ways of harmonization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1