Combination therapy with single inhaler budesonide/formoterol compared with high dose of fluticasone propionate alone in patients with moderate persistent asthma.

Eric D Bateman, Theo A Bantje, Maria João Gomes, Michael G Toumbis, Rudolf M Huber, Ian Naya, Avraham Eliraz
{"title":"Combination therapy with single inhaler budesonide/formoterol compared with high dose of fluticasone propionate alone in patients with moderate persistent asthma.","authors":"Eric D Bateman,&nbsp;Theo A Bantje,&nbsp;Maria João Gomes,&nbsp;Michael G Toumbis,&nbsp;Rudolf M Huber,&nbsp;Ian Naya,&nbsp;Avraham Eliraz","doi":"10.1007/BF03256655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy and safety of Symbicort (budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler) were compared with those of a high dose of the commonly used corticosteroid fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study involved 373 patients with asthma (mean age 42 years; FEV(1) 78% of predicted; reversibility 21%). After a 2-week run-in period, during which patients received budesonide 200 microg twice daily, they were randomly assigned to treatment with either Symbicort Turbuhaler (budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg, one inhalation twice daily) or Flovent/Flixotide Diskus (fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily) for 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly greater increases in morning PEF, the primary efficacy variable, were observed in patients treated with budesonide/formoterol compared with fluticasone propionate (27.4 L/min vs 7.7 L/min; p < 0.001). Evening PEF and clinic FEV(1) also favored budesonide/formoterol compared with fluticasone propionate (p < 0.001), as did use of reliever medication (p = 0.04) and the proportion of reliever-free days (p < 0.001). There were also numerical improvements in symptom-free days (60.4% vs 55.5%), night-time awakenings (7.9% vs 9.6%) and asthma-control days (57.8% vs 52.4%) in favor of budesonide/formoterol. The risk of an exacerbation was reduced by 32% in the budesonide/formoterol group compared with the fluticasone propionate group (p < 0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler) was more effective than a high dose of fluticasone propionate in improving lung function, reducing use of reliever medication and improving control of moderate persistent asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"2 3","pages":"275-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256655","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of Symbicort (budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler) were compared with those of a high dose of the commonly used corticosteroid fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study involved 373 patients with asthma (mean age 42 years; FEV(1) 78% of predicted; reversibility 21%). After a 2-week run-in period, during which patients received budesonide 200 microg twice daily, they were randomly assigned to treatment with either Symbicort Turbuhaler (budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg, one inhalation twice daily) or Flovent/Flixotide Diskus (fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily) for 12 weeks.

Results: Significantly greater increases in morning PEF, the primary efficacy variable, were observed in patients treated with budesonide/formoterol compared with fluticasone propionate (27.4 L/min vs 7.7 L/min; p < 0.001). Evening PEF and clinic FEV(1) also favored budesonide/formoterol compared with fluticasone propionate (p < 0.001), as did use of reliever medication (p = 0.04) and the proportion of reliever-free days (p < 0.001). There were also numerical improvements in symptom-free days (60.4% vs 55.5%), night-time awakenings (7.9% vs 9.6%) and asthma-control days (57.8% vs 52.4%) in favor of budesonide/formoterol. The risk of an exacerbation was reduced by 32% in the budesonide/formoterol group compared with the fluticasone propionate group (p < 0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusion: Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler) was more effective than a high dose of fluticasone propionate in improving lung function, reducing use of reliever medication and improving control of moderate persistent asthma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布地奈德/福莫特罗单吸入器联合治疗与单独大剂量丙酸氟替卡松在中度持续性哮喘患者中的比较
背景:比较了辛比柯(布地奈德和福莫特罗单次吸入器)与大剂量常用皮质类固醇丙酸氟替卡松在中度持续性哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:这项随机、双盲、双虚拟、平行组研究纳入373例哮喘患者(平均年龄42岁;FEV(1)为预测值的78%;可逆性21%)。在2周的磨合期后,患者接受布地奈德200微克,每日2次,他们被随机分配到辛比可turbbuhaler(布地奈德/福莫特罗160/4.5微克,每日2次,1次吸入)或氟文特/氟索肽Diskus(丙酸氟替卡松250微克,每日2次)治疗12周。结果:与丙酸氟替卡松相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗治疗的患者早晨PEF(主要疗效变量)显著增加(27.4 L/min vs 7.7 L/min;P < 0.001)。与丙酸氟替卡松相比,夜间PEF和临床FEV(1)也更倾向于布地奈德/福莫特罗(p < 0.001),缓解药物的使用(p = 0.04)和无缓解天数的比例(p < 0.001)也是如此。布地奈德/福莫特罗在无症状天数(60.4% vs 55.5%)、夜间觉醒时间(7.9% vs 9.6%)和哮喘控制天数(57.8% vs 52.4%)方面也有数值上的改善。与丙酸氟替卡松组相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗组加重风险降低32% (p < 0.05)。两种治疗方法均耐受良好。结论:辛比柯(布地奈德/福莫特罗单吸入器)在改善肺功能、减少缓解药物使用和改善中度持续性哮喘控制方面比大剂量丙酸氟替卡松更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The emerging role of leukotriene modifiers in allergic rhinitis. Is there a role for systemic corticosteroids in the management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Pseudomonal infections in patients with COPD: epidemiology and management. Treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections during pregnancy. Anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibodies: preclinical and clinical evidence in asthma models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1