Beta2-agonist eutomers: a rational option for the treatment of asthma?

David W Boulton, J Paul Fawcett
{"title":"Beta2-agonist eutomers: a rational option for the treatment of asthma?","authors":"David W Boulton,&nbsp;J Paul Fawcett","doi":"10.1007/BF03256624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists) such as albuterol (salbutamol) and terbutaline and their long-acting analogs salmeterol and formoterol are widely used as bronchodilators in the treatment of asthma. They are chiral drugs historically marketed as racemic mixtures of an active (eutomer) and essentially inactive (distomer) stereoisomer. Despite their obvious therapeutic value and widespread use, beta2-agonists have been implicated, somewhat controversially, in causing an increase in asthma mortality and a deterioration of asthma control by a mechanism that remains elusive. Inherent toxicity of the distomers has been widely touted as an explanation and has given rise to pressure for the replacement of the racemates with pure eutomer formulations (the so-called chiral or racemic switch). This has culminated in the recent introduction into clinical practice of the single active stereoisomer of albuterol (levalbuterol) and the promise of other pure beta2-agonist eutomer formulations to follow. This article examines the evidence on which these chiral switches are based. Clinical studies designed to reveal negative effects of beta2-agonists have searched for reductions in lung function, increases in airway responsiveness to bronchoconstrictor mediators and worsening of asthma control. Crossover studies administering the pure stereoisomers and racemate of albuterol have not shown a clear superiority of the pure eutomer formulation over the racemate in terms of either bronchial hyperresponsiveness, tachyphylaxis to bronchoprotective effects or improvements in lung function. Clinical toxicity of beta2-agonist distomers on any aspect of asthmatic lung function has also not been demonstrated in the relatively short-term inhalational studies (single dose or repeated dose studies <1 week) that have been carried out. In animal studies, the administration of beta2-agonist racemates and distomers has been shown to enhance bronchial hyperresponsiveness but only in ovalbumin-sensitized animals where the relevance to humans is questionable. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of beta(2)-agonist stereoisomers appear to be essentially similar whether administered as single stereoisomers or as racemates. Levalbuterol may be slightly more potent than an equivalent dose given as racemate, but there is some evidence that it forms a small amount of the distomer in vivo which detracts somewhat from its purported benefits over use of the racemate. Whilst there remains a clear need for studies of longer duration with sensitive clinical endpoints to evaluate the benefits of beta2-agonist eutomers and to investigate distomer toxicity, the chiral switch for beta2-agonists in general, and for albuterol in particular, does not appear to be justified on the basis of the evidence available to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"1 5","pages":"305-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256624","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists) such as albuterol (salbutamol) and terbutaline and their long-acting analogs salmeterol and formoterol are widely used as bronchodilators in the treatment of asthma. They are chiral drugs historically marketed as racemic mixtures of an active (eutomer) and essentially inactive (distomer) stereoisomer. Despite their obvious therapeutic value and widespread use, beta2-agonists have been implicated, somewhat controversially, in causing an increase in asthma mortality and a deterioration of asthma control by a mechanism that remains elusive. Inherent toxicity of the distomers has been widely touted as an explanation and has given rise to pressure for the replacement of the racemates with pure eutomer formulations (the so-called chiral or racemic switch). This has culminated in the recent introduction into clinical practice of the single active stereoisomer of albuterol (levalbuterol) and the promise of other pure beta2-agonist eutomer formulations to follow. This article examines the evidence on which these chiral switches are based. Clinical studies designed to reveal negative effects of beta2-agonists have searched for reductions in lung function, increases in airway responsiveness to bronchoconstrictor mediators and worsening of asthma control. Crossover studies administering the pure stereoisomers and racemate of albuterol have not shown a clear superiority of the pure eutomer formulation over the racemate in terms of either bronchial hyperresponsiveness, tachyphylaxis to bronchoprotective effects or improvements in lung function. Clinical toxicity of beta2-agonist distomers on any aspect of asthmatic lung function has also not been demonstrated in the relatively short-term inhalational studies (single dose or repeated dose studies <1 week) that have been carried out. In animal studies, the administration of beta2-agonist racemates and distomers has been shown to enhance bronchial hyperresponsiveness but only in ovalbumin-sensitized animals where the relevance to humans is questionable. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of beta(2)-agonist stereoisomers appear to be essentially similar whether administered as single stereoisomers or as racemates. Levalbuterol may be slightly more potent than an equivalent dose given as racemate, but there is some evidence that it forms a small amount of the distomer in vivo which detracts somewhat from its purported benefits over use of the racemate. Whilst there remains a clear need for studies of longer duration with sensitive clinical endpoints to evaluate the benefits of beta2-agonist eutomers and to investigate distomer toxicity, the chiral switch for beta2-agonists in general, and for albuterol in particular, does not appear to be justified on the basis of the evidence available to date.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
β -受体激动剂:治疗哮喘的合理选择?
β 2-肾上腺素受体激动剂(β 2-激动剂)如沙丁胺醇和特布他林及其长效类似物沙美特罗和福莫特罗被广泛用作支气管扩张剂治疗哮喘。它们是手性药物,历史上作为活性(同聚体)和非活性(异聚体)立体异构体的外消旋混合物销售。尽管β 2激动剂具有明显的治疗价值和广泛的应用,但其引起哮喘死亡率增加和哮喘控制恶化的机制仍不明确,这在一定程度上存在争议。二消体的固有毒性已被广泛吹捧为一种解释,并引起了用纯自聚体代替外消旋体的压力(所谓的手性或外消旋开关)。这在最近沙丁胺醇的单一活性立体异构体(左旋沙丁胺醇)引入临床实践以及其他纯β - 2激动剂自聚体制剂的前景中达到高潮。本文考察了这些手性开关所依据的证据。临床研究旨在揭示β 2激动剂的负面影响,研究发现肺功能降低,气道对支气管收缩介质的反应性增加,哮喘控制恶化。交叉研究表明,沙丁胺醇的纯立体异构体和外消旋体制剂在支气管高反应性、支气管保护作用的快速反应或肺功能改善方面没有明显优于外消旋体制剂。在相对短期的吸入性研究(单次给药或重复给药研究)中,β 2激动剂对哮喘肺功能的任何方面的临床毒性也未得到证实
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The emerging role of leukotriene modifiers in allergic rhinitis. Is there a role for systemic corticosteroids in the management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Pseudomonal infections in patients with COPD: epidemiology and management. Treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections during pregnancy. Anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibodies: preclinical and clinical evidence in asthma models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1