Could X-ray microbeams inhibit angioplasty-induced restenosis in the rat carotid artery?

F.A. Dilmanian , J. Kalef-Ezra , M.J. Petersen , G. Bozios , J. Vosswinkel , F. Giron , B. Ren , R. Yakupov , G. Antonakopoulos
{"title":"Could X-ray microbeams inhibit angioplasty-induced restenosis in the rat carotid artery?","authors":"F.A. Dilmanian ,&nbsp;J. Kalef-Ezra ,&nbsp;M.J. Petersen ,&nbsp;G. Bozios ,&nbsp;J. Vosswinkel ,&nbsp;F. Giron ,&nbsp;B. Ren ,&nbsp;R. Yakupov ,&nbsp;G. Antonakopoulos","doi":"10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00180-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Parallel, thin (&lt;100 μm) planes of synchrotron-generated X rays, have been shown to spare normal tissues and preferentially damage tumors in animal models. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of such microbeams directed unidirectionally on angioplasted rat carotid arteries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>Three groups of Sprague–Dawley rats were studied: (a) rats with normal, untreated arteries, (b) rats treated by balloon angioplasty, but not irradiated, and (c) rats treated with balloon angioplasty and exposed to single fraction, unidirectional, parallel, microbeams an hour after angioplasty. The microbeam array, 15 mm wide×7.6 mm high, consisting of 27-μm-wide beam slices, spaced 200 μm center-to-center laterally traversed the damaged artery. The in-depth in-beam dose was 150 Gy, the “valley” dose (dose midway between microbeams resulting mainly from X-ray scattering) was 4.5 Gy on average, and the “integrated” (averaged) dose was 26 Gy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Microbeam irradiation, as given in the present study, was tolerated, but was insufficient to significantly suppress the neointimal hyperplasia.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The microbeam dose used is considered low. Dose escalation would be necessary to reach conclusive results regarding the X-ray microbeam efficacy to control restenosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80261,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00180-X","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152218650300180X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background

Parallel, thin (<100 μm) planes of synchrotron-generated X rays, have been shown to spare normal tissues and preferentially damage tumors in animal models. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of such microbeams directed unidirectionally on angioplasted rat carotid arteries.

Methods and materials

Three groups of Sprague–Dawley rats were studied: (a) rats with normal, untreated arteries, (b) rats treated by balloon angioplasty, but not irradiated, and (c) rats treated with balloon angioplasty and exposed to single fraction, unidirectional, parallel, microbeams an hour after angioplasty. The microbeam array, 15 mm wide×7.6 mm high, consisting of 27-μm-wide beam slices, spaced 200 μm center-to-center laterally traversed the damaged artery. The in-depth in-beam dose was 150 Gy, the “valley” dose (dose midway between microbeams resulting mainly from X-ray scattering) was 4.5 Gy on average, and the “integrated” (averaged) dose was 26 Gy.

Results

Microbeam irradiation, as given in the present study, was tolerated, but was insufficient to significantly suppress the neointimal hyperplasia.

Discussion

The microbeam dose used is considered low. Dose escalation would be necessary to reach conclusive results regarding the X-ray microbeam efficacy to control restenosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
x射线微束能否抑制血管成形术诱导的大鼠颈动脉再狭窄?
平行的、薄的(<100 μm)同步加速器产生的X射线平面在动物模型中被证明可以保护正常组织并优先损伤肿瘤。本研究的目的是评估单向微束对血管成形术大鼠颈动脉的影响。方法和材料采用三组Sprague-Dawley大鼠进行研究:(a)正常动脉,未处理;(b)球囊血管成形术,未照射;(c)球囊血管成形术,血管成形术后1小时暴露于单段、单向、平行微束下。微束阵列高15 mm wide×7.6 mm,由27 μm宽的束片组成,中间间隔200 μm,横向穿过受损动脉。束内深度剂量为150 Gy,“谷”剂量(主要由x射线散射引起的微束中间剂量)平均为4.5 Gy,“综合”(平均)剂量为26 Gy。结果本研究给予的微束照射是耐受的,但不足以显著抑制新生内膜增生。所使用的微束剂量被认为是低的。对于x射线微束控制再狭窄的有效性,必须增加剂量以达到结论性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts No change in endothelial-dependent vasomotion late after coronary irradiation Clinical and angiographic outcomes of cardiac transplant patients treated with intracoronary beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis Brachytherapy with gamma radiation of a coronary artery for in-stent restenosis may induce the regression of in-stent restenosis of an adjacent coronary artery without angioplasty. First case report and review of the literature Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease: before or after coronary surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1