Genotypic resistance tests for the management of structured therapeutic interruptions after multiple drug failure.

Maria Montroni, Antonella D'Arminio Monforte
{"title":"Genotypic resistance tests for the management of structured therapeutic interruptions after multiple drug failure.","authors":"Maria Montroni,&nbsp;Antonella D'Arminio Monforte","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Witness for the prosecution: Structured treatment interruption (STI) has been considered among the possible therapeutic options for multidrug experienced HIV-infected individuals facing virological failure, since early studies suggested the possibility of viral reversion from drug-resistant mutated species to drug-sensitive wild-type virus following the release of drug pressure. However, the persistence of mutated viral populations during STI has been observed. The lack of detection of resistance mutations in plasma is mainly due to the low sensitivity of the currently available genotypic resistance testing, which is unable to detect resistant less fit virus masked by overwhelming re-emerged wild-type quasi-species. Restarting antiretroviral therapy (ART) is frequently followed by the reappearance of resistant virus, as well as by disease progression. STI should be applied with extreme caution in multidrug experienced HIV-infected individuals with virological failure. Use of genotype resistance testing in this particular setting, although useful in controlled clinical trials, should be considered of little help in clinical practice. Witness for the defence: The rationale for salvage STI has been elucidated. Data from observational and randomized studies have been revised, and the following conclusions in defence of salvage STI are: in more than 60% of patients undergoing salvage STI for at least 3 months there is a reversion of drug-associated mutations. Concurrently, increases in HIV-RNA and decreases in CD4 cells occur. Few clinical events have been reported in patients with CD4 counts of < 200 cells/mm3. New resistance-driven salvage regimens, including at least 1 new drug, result in good virological outcome in a short-term follow-up. Warnings are related to possible clinical progression and to the course of the infection in reservoirs. Randomized studies are required to elucidate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":76520,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum","volume":"106 ","pages":"79-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Witness for the prosecution: Structured treatment interruption (STI) has been considered among the possible therapeutic options for multidrug experienced HIV-infected individuals facing virological failure, since early studies suggested the possibility of viral reversion from drug-resistant mutated species to drug-sensitive wild-type virus following the release of drug pressure. However, the persistence of mutated viral populations during STI has been observed. The lack of detection of resistance mutations in plasma is mainly due to the low sensitivity of the currently available genotypic resistance testing, which is unable to detect resistant less fit virus masked by overwhelming re-emerged wild-type quasi-species. Restarting antiretroviral therapy (ART) is frequently followed by the reappearance of resistant virus, as well as by disease progression. STI should be applied with extreme caution in multidrug experienced HIV-infected individuals with virological failure. Use of genotype resistance testing in this particular setting, although useful in controlled clinical trials, should be considered of little help in clinical practice. Witness for the defence: The rationale for salvage STI has been elucidated. Data from observational and randomized studies have been revised, and the following conclusions in defence of salvage STI are: in more than 60% of patients undergoing salvage STI for at least 3 months there is a reversion of drug-associated mutations. Concurrently, increases in HIV-RNA and decreases in CD4 cells occur. Few clinical events have been reported in patients with CD4 counts of < 200 cells/mm3. New resistance-driven salvage regimens, including at least 1 new drug, result in good virological outcome in a short-term follow-up. Warnings are related to possible clinical progression and to the course of the infection in reservoirs. Randomized studies are required to elucidate these findings.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因型耐药试验对多种药物失败后结构性治疗中断的管理。
控方证人:结构化治疗中断(STI)已被认为是面临病毒学失败的多种药物经验的艾滋病毒感染者的可能治疗选择之一,因为早期研究表明,在药物压力释放后,病毒可能从耐药突变物种逆转为对药物敏感的野生型病毒。然而,已经观察到在性传播感染期间突变病毒种群的持久性。血浆中缺乏耐药突变的检测主要是由于目前可用的基因型耐药检测灵敏度低,无法检测被大量重新出现的野生型准物种掩盖的耐药度较低的病毒。重新开始抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)之后,经常出现耐药病毒的重新出现以及疾病进展。在病毒学失败的有多种药物经验的艾滋病毒感染者中,应极其谨慎地应用性传播感染。在这种特殊情况下使用基因型耐药检测,尽管在对照临床试验中有用,但在临床实践中应被认为帮助不大。辩方证人:打捞性STI的理由已经阐明。来自观察性研究和随机研究的数据已经被修订,以下结论可以为补救性性传播感染辩护:在60%以上接受补救性性传播感染至少3个月的患者中,药物相关突变出现逆转。同时,HIV-RNA增加,CD4细胞减少。CD4计数< 200 cells/mm3的患者很少有临床事件报道。新的耐药挽救方案,包括至少一种新药,在短期随访中产生良好的病毒学结果。警告与可能的临床进展和水库感染的过程有关。需要随机研究来阐明这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Annual disease burden due to human papillomavirus (HPV) 6 and 11 infections in Finland. Annual disease burden due to human papillomavirus 16 and 18 infections in Finland. HIV viral resistance to antiretroviral drugs: foreword. Use of genotypic assays for the detection of antiretroviral resistance: a legal proceeding, Rome, 22-23 April 2002. Viral resistance to chemotherapeutic agents: an expectable unexpected phenomenon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1