Topology of constitutional reciprocal translocations in metaphase

María G. Domínguez , R. Troyo , Ana I. Vásquez , Alma L. Ramos , Horacio Rivera
{"title":"Topology of constitutional reciprocal translocations in metaphase","authors":"María G. Domínguez ,&nbsp;R. Troyo ,&nbsp;Ana I. Vásquez ,&nbsp;Alma L. Ramos ,&nbsp;Horacio Rivera","doi":"10.1016/S0003-3995(03)00033-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We studied in 39 carriers of 26 reciprocal translocations (including five de novo and seven of indeterminate occurrence) the metaphase localization of the derivative chromosomes, their normal non-homologous counterparts (here called A and B), and two control pairs (C and D). In eight familial translocations, we analysed two to five carriers. We digitally captured 10 G–banded lymphocyte metaphases per individual and measured in microns the largest diameter (<em>d</em>) of the metaphase and six intercentromeric distances: (1) der A↔der B (problem distance 1, pd1), (2) der A↔B (pd2), (3) der B↔A (pd3), (4) A↔B (control distance 1, cd1), (5) the smaller distance between C and D (cd2) and (6) the largest distance between C and D (cd3); in addition, the average between C and D (cd4) was calculated. We used the formula Δ = 100(cd – pd)/<em>d</em> 12 times per metaphase, compared each pd vs. each cd, and tested the differences by the Wilcoxon matched-pair test. Although, in the whole sample there were not significant differences respect to cd1, this distance emerged as the proper control. In the eight familial translocations, the three pd vs. cd1 comparisons revealed that in 19/24 times the pd was smaller but only once reached significance (cd1 vs. pd2 in t[3;4]). In the analysis per individual the pd was smaller than cd1 in 19 (pd1), 22 (pd2) and 22 (pd3) cases although only twice reached significance. We conclude that in some translocations, the derivative chromosomes actually lie close from each other or from a normal non-homologous counterpart.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100089,"journal":{"name":"Annales de Génétique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0003-3995(03)00033-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de Génétique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003399503000339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We studied in 39 carriers of 26 reciprocal translocations (including five de novo and seven of indeterminate occurrence) the metaphase localization of the derivative chromosomes, their normal non-homologous counterparts (here called A and B), and two control pairs (C and D). In eight familial translocations, we analysed two to five carriers. We digitally captured 10 G–banded lymphocyte metaphases per individual and measured in microns the largest diameter (d) of the metaphase and six intercentromeric distances: (1) der A↔der B (problem distance 1, pd1), (2) der A↔B (pd2), (3) der B↔A (pd3), (4) A↔B (control distance 1, cd1), (5) the smaller distance between C and D (cd2) and (6) the largest distance between C and D (cd3); in addition, the average between C and D (cd4) was calculated. We used the formula Δ = 100(cd – pd)/d 12 times per metaphase, compared each pd vs. each cd, and tested the differences by the Wilcoxon matched-pair test. Although, in the whole sample there were not significant differences respect to cd1, this distance emerged as the proper control. In the eight familial translocations, the three pd vs. cd1 comparisons revealed that in 19/24 times the pd was smaller but only once reached significance (cd1 vs. pd2 in t[3;4]). In the analysis per individual the pd was smaller than cd1 in 19 (pd1), 22 (pd2) and 22 (pd3) cases although only twice reached significance. We conclude that in some translocations, the derivative chromosomes actually lie close from each other or from a normal non-homologous counterpart.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中期构象互易位的拓扑结构
我们研究了26个互惠易位的39个携带者(包括5个新生易位和7个不确定易位),衍生染色体的中期定位,它们的正常非同源染色体(这里称为A和B),以及两个对照染色体(C和D)。在8个家族易位中,我们分析了2到5个携带者。我们以数字方式捕获了每个人10个g带淋巴细胞中期,并以微米为单位测量了中期的最大直径(d)和六个着丝粒间距离:(1)der A↔der B(问题距离1,pd1), (2) der A↔B (pd2), (3) der B↔A (pd3), (4) A↔B(控制距离1,cd1), (5) C和d之间的较小距离(cd2)和(6)C和d之间的最大距离(cd3);并计算C与D (cd4)的平均值。我们在每个中期使用公式Δ = 100(cd - pd)/d 12次,比较每个pd与每个cd,并通过Wilcoxon配对对检验检验差异。虽然,在整个样本中,cd1没有显着差异,但这个距离成为适当的控制。在8个家族易位中,3个pd与cd1的比较显示,在19/24次中pd较小,但只有一次达到显著性(cd1 vs. pd2在t中[3;4])。在个体分析中,pd小于cd1的病例分别为19例(pd1)、22例(pd2)和22例(pd3),但只有2例达到显著性。我们得出的结论是,在一些易位中,衍生染色体实际上离彼此很近,或者离正常的非同源染色体很近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author index Keyword index Prevalence of C282Y and H63D mutations in the haemochromatosis (HFE) gene in Tunisian population Y chromosome micro-deletions in idiopathic infertility from Northern India DNA polymorphism analysis of candidate genes for type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Mexican ethnic group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1