Is drip infusion cholecystocholangiography (DIC) an acceptable modality at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis, considering the frequency of bile duct maljunction and intraoperative bile duct injury?

Takanori Ochiai, Shigeru Yamazaki, Kazutoshi Ohta, Masayasu Takahashi, Takehisa Iwai, Takumi Irie, Norio Noguchi, Susumu Takamatsu, Toru Kawamura, Kenichi Teramoto, Shigeki Arii
{"title":"Is drip infusion cholecystocholangiography (DIC) an acceptable modality at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis, considering the frequency of bile duct maljunction and intraoperative bile duct injury?","authors":"Takanori Ochiai,&nbsp;Shigeru Yamazaki,&nbsp;Kazutoshi Ohta,&nbsp;Masayasu Takahashi,&nbsp;Takehisa Iwai,&nbsp;Takumi Irie,&nbsp;Norio Noguchi,&nbsp;Susumu Takamatsu,&nbsp;Toru Kawamura,&nbsp;Kenichi Teramoto,&nbsp;Shigeki Arii","doi":"10.1007/s00534-003-0873-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Knowledge of the configuration of the extrahepatic bile duct is indispensable to avoid bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Various methods of examining the biliary tract have been developed; however, the most appropriate preoperative diagnostic modality at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis has not yet been reported. Considering the frequency of bile duct maljunction (BDM) and operative bile duct injury, in addition to the cost and invasiveness of the various examination methods, we evaluated the usefulness of drip infusion cholecystocholangiography (DIC) as the optimal method of examination at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative diagnostic accuracy of BDM was analyzed in relation to operative bile duct injury using 469 patients with benign biliary diseases who was diagnosed with DIC and endoscopic retrograde cholecystography and underwent cholecystectomy. BDM was classified according to Hisatsugu criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 469 consecutive patients who underwent a cholecystectomy for biliary stones between January 1, 1995, and September 30, 1998, at Ohta Nishinouchi General Hospital, 21 (4.48%) had a cystic duct maljunction (CDM) and 12 (2.56%) had an aberrant bile duct (ABD). The most common variants were types C and D for CDM, and types II and III for ABD, according to Hisatsugu's classification. Fourteen patients (42.4%) were diagnosed before the surgery; 13 of them received preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), and the remaining patient underwent preoperative drip infusion cholecystocholangiography (DIC). Nineteen patients could not be correctly diagnosed based on their preoperative examinations, but were diagnosed during surgery. Operative bile duct injury occurred in 1 patient (0.2%) whose maljunction could not be diagnosed before the operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taking into account the medical cost and invasiveness, and the frequency of BDM and related bile duct injuries, we conclude that DIC is an acceptable preoperative diagnostic modality to employ at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis. Knowledge of the configuration of the extrahepatic bile duct is indispensable to avoid bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Various methods of examining the biliary tract have been developed; however, the most appropriate preoperative diagnostic modality at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis has not yet been reported. Considering the frequency of bile duct maljunction (BDM) and operative bile duct injury, in addition to the cost and invasiveness of the various examination methods, we evaluated the usefulness of drip infusion cholecystocholangiography (DIC) as the optimal method of examination at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"135-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-003-0873-4","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-003-0873-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background/purpose: Knowledge of the configuration of the extrahepatic bile duct is indispensable to avoid bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Various methods of examining the biliary tract have been developed; however, the most appropriate preoperative diagnostic modality at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis has not yet been reported. Considering the frequency of bile duct maljunction (BDM) and operative bile duct injury, in addition to the cost and invasiveness of the various examination methods, we evaluated the usefulness of drip infusion cholecystocholangiography (DIC) as the optimal method of examination at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis.

Methods: Preoperative diagnostic accuracy of BDM was analyzed in relation to operative bile duct injury using 469 patients with benign biliary diseases who was diagnosed with DIC and endoscopic retrograde cholecystography and underwent cholecystectomy. BDM was classified according to Hisatsugu criteria.

Results: Out of 469 consecutive patients who underwent a cholecystectomy for biliary stones between January 1, 1995, and September 30, 1998, at Ohta Nishinouchi General Hospital, 21 (4.48%) had a cystic duct maljunction (CDM) and 12 (2.56%) had an aberrant bile duct (ABD). The most common variants were types C and D for CDM, and types II and III for ABD, according to Hisatsugu's classification. Fourteen patients (42.4%) were diagnosed before the surgery; 13 of them received preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), and the remaining patient underwent preoperative drip infusion cholecystocholangiography (DIC). Nineteen patients could not be correctly diagnosed based on their preoperative examinations, but were diagnosed during surgery. Operative bile duct injury occurred in 1 patient (0.2%) whose maljunction could not be diagnosed before the operation.

Conclusions: Taking into account the medical cost and invasiveness, and the frequency of BDM and related bile duct injuries, we conclude that DIC is an acceptable preoperative diagnostic modality to employ at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis. Knowledge of the configuration of the extrahepatic bile duct is indispensable to avoid bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Various methods of examining the biliary tract have been developed; however, the most appropriate preoperative diagnostic modality at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis has not yet been reported. Considering the frequency of bile duct maljunction (BDM) and operative bile duct injury, in addition to the cost and invasiveness of the various examination methods, we evaluated the usefulness of drip infusion cholecystocholangiography (DIC) as the optimal method of examination at cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑到胆管畸形和术中胆管损伤的频率,输注胆囊胆管造影(DIC)是胆囊结石患者胆囊切除术中可接受的方式吗?
背景/目的:了解肝外胆管的构造是避免胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的必要条件。各种检查胆道的方法已经发展起来;然而,胆囊结石术前最合适的诊断方式尚未见报道。考虑到胆管畸形(BDM)和手术胆管损伤的频率,以及各种检查方法的成本和侵入性,我们评估了滴注胆囊胆管造影(DIC)作为胆囊切除术中胆囊结石的最佳检查方法的有效性。方法:分析469例诊断为DIC并行内镜逆行胆囊造影的良性胆道疾病患者术前BDM与手术性胆管损伤的诊断准确性。根据Hisatsugu标准对BDM进行分类。结果:在1995年1月1日至1998年9月30日期间,在大田西内总医院连续行胆囊切除术的469例胆结石患者中,21例(4.48%)有胆囊管畸形(CDM), 12例(2.56%)有胆管异常(ABD)。根据Hisatsugu的分类,最常见的变异是CDM的C型和D型,ABD的II型和III型。术前确诊14例(42.4%);其中13例术前行内镜逆行胆道造影(ERC),其余患者术前行滴注胆道造影(DIC)。19例患者术前检查不能正确诊断,但术中诊断。术中胆管损伤1例(0.2%),术前未发现异常。结论:考虑到医疗费用和侵入性,以及BDM和相关胆管损伤的频率,我们得出结论,DIC是胆囊结石胆囊切除术中可接受的术前诊断方式。了解肝外胆管的构造对于避免胆囊切除术中胆管损伤是必不可少的。各种检查胆道的方法已经发展起来;然而,胆囊结石术前最合适的诊断方式尚未见报道。考虑到胆管畸形(BDM)和手术胆管损伤的频率,以及各种检查方法的成本和侵入性,我们评估了滴注胆囊胆管造影(DIC)作为胆囊切除术中胆囊结石的最佳检查方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection: technique, indications and results. Laparoscopic major hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: formidable challenge to standardization. Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Proceedings of a consensus meeting, April 2006, Tokyo, Japan. Treatment outcome of selective digestive decontamination and enteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Protective effects of a hibernation-inducer on hepatocyte injury induced by hypothermic preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1