Assessment by flow cytometry of intracellular cytokine production in the peripheral blood cells of renal transplant recipients

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2004-07-05 DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00179.x
Colm C Magee, Mark D Denton, Karl L Womer, Samia J Khoury, Mohamed H Sayegh
{"title":"Assessment by flow cytometry of intracellular cytokine production in the peripheral blood cells of renal transplant recipients","authors":"Colm C Magee,&nbsp;Mark D Denton,&nbsp;Karl L Womer,&nbsp;Samia J Khoury,&nbsp;Mohamed H Sayegh","doi":"10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00179.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract: </b><b> Introduction: </b> There is accumulating evidence that non-invasive immune monitoring may be useful in the early period after renal transplant, particularly with regard to predicting the presence of acute rejection. It is less clear whether chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is also associated with consistent changes in peripheral blood or urine cells. We hypothesized that patients with CAN would manifest different patterns of cytokine production (compared with non-CAN controls), detectable in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).</p><p><b>Methods: </b> Flow cytometry was used to quantify production within PBMCs of multiple cytokines.</p><p><b>Results: </b> A pilot study showed significant differences in cytokine production between healthy controls and transplanted subjects. However, differences between transplanted patients with and without CAN were small and non-significant.</p><p><b>Discussion: </b> Flow cytometry is a potentially useful method for quantifying cytokine production by PBMCs of renal transplant recipients. The technique is sensitive enough to detect differences between distinct test groups but could not find differences between recipients with and without CAN. This probably reflects the lack of a true difference because pathological changes within the <i>long-term</i> allograft may simply not be reflected or detected in the total population of PBMCs. Further studies should explore the usefulness of this technique in assaying more defined populations of PBMCs (such as those activated by donor allopeptides) and in serial monitoring of individual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"18 4","pages":"395-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00179.x","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00179.x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: There is accumulating evidence that non-invasive immune monitoring may be useful in the early period after renal transplant, particularly with regard to predicting the presence of acute rejection. It is less clear whether chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is also associated with consistent changes in peripheral blood or urine cells. We hypothesized that patients with CAN would manifest different patterns of cytokine production (compared with non-CAN controls), detectable in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

Methods: Flow cytometry was used to quantify production within PBMCs of multiple cytokines.

Results: A pilot study showed significant differences in cytokine production between healthy controls and transplanted subjects. However, differences between transplanted patients with and without CAN were small and non-significant.

Discussion: Flow cytometry is a potentially useful method for quantifying cytokine production by PBMCs of renal transplant recipients. The technique is sensitive enough to detect differences between distinct test groups but could not find differences between recipients with and without CAN. This probably reflects the lack of a true difference because pathological changes within the long-term allograft may simply not be reflected or detected in the total population of PBMCs. Further studies should explore the usefulness of this technique in assaying more defined populations of PBMCs (such as those activated by donor allopeptides) and in serial monitoring of individual patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用流式细胞术评估肾移植受者外周血细胞内细胞因子的产生
摘要:越来越多的证据表明,非侵入性免疫监测在肾移植后早期可能是有用的,特别是在预测急性排斥反应的存在方面。慢性同种异体移植肾病(CAN)是否也与外周血或尿细胞的持续变化有关尚不清楚。我们假设CAN患者表现出不同的细胞因子产生模式(与非CAN对照相比),可在外周血单核细胞(PBMCs)中检测到。方法:采用流式细胞术定量PBMCs内多种细胞因子的产生。结果:一项初步研究显示,健康对照组和移植受试者之间的细胞因子产生有显著差异。然而,患有和不患有CAN的移植患者之间的差异很小且不显著。讨论:流式细胞术是定量肾移植受者外周血单核细胞细胞因子产生的一种潜在的有用方法。这项技术足够灵敏,可以检测到不同测试组之间的差异,但无法发现患有和不患有CAN的接受者之间的差异。这可能反映了缺乏真正的差异,因为长期同种异体移植物内的病理变化可能根本无法反映或检测到pbmc的总体。进一步的研究应该探索这项技术在分析更明确的PBMCs群体(如那些被供体同种异体肽激活的PBMCs)和个体患者的连续监测中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Prolonged Impella 5.5 Support on Post-Transplant Outcomes: An Institutional Study. Optimizing Liver Transplant Allocation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Development and Validation of a Survival Benefit-Based Model. Risk Factors for Failure to Rescue in Adult Liver Transplantation Recipients: A Systematic Review. Association of Posttransplant Kidney Function With Patient Reported Outcomes: A Single Center's Experience Over Nearly Two Decades. Impact of Pre-Transplant Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Use on Allograft Outcomes Following Kidney Transplant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1