Feasibility of hanging maneuvers in orthotopic liver transplantation with inferior vena cava preservation and in liver surgery.

Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Giovanni Vennarecci, Arianna Boschetto, Richard Douard, Eugenio Santoro
{"title":"Feasibility of hanging maneuvers in orthotopic liver transplantation with inferior vena cava preservation and in liver surgery.","authors":"Giuseppe Maria Ettorre,&nbsp;Giovanni Vennarecci,&nbsp;Arianna Boschetto,&nbsp;Richard Douard,&nbsp;Eugenio Santoro","doi":"10.1007/s00534-004-0903-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>The aim of this work was to study the feasibility and complication rates of liver hanging maneuvers: the Belghiti liver hanging maneuver (BLHM) in liver resection and the modified liver hanging maneuver (MLHM) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with inferior vena cava (IVC) preservation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2001 to August 2003, BLHM was planned in 26 consecutive right hepatectomies and MLHM in 28 consecutive OLTs with IVC preservation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BLHM was performed in 24/26 patients (92%). In the 2 remaining patients, chronic biliary infection (n = 1) and intraparenchymal hemorrhagic hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1) did not allow BLHM to be achieved. Bleeding during the BLHM procedure occurred in 1 patient (4%), with no need for interruption. MLHM was performed in all 28 patients, and in none of them was bleeding observed during the maneuver.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BLHM and MLHM are important technical refinements with several advantages. Feasibility rates were 92% and 100%, respectively. Bleeding risk remained low (4%) for BLHM and was 0% for MLHM. The rate of BLHM failure suggests that the feasibility rate may be higher in normal liver parenchyma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"11 3","pages":"155-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-004-0903-x","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-004-0903-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Background/purpose: The aim of this work was to study the feasibility and complication rates of liver hanging maneuvers: the Belghiti liver hanging maneuver (BLHM) in liver resection and the modified liver hanging maneuver (MLHM) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with inferior vena cava (IVC) preservation.

Methods: From January 2001 to August 2003, BLHM was planned in 26 consecutive right hepatectomies and MLHM in 28 consecutive OLTs with IVC preservation.

Results: BLHM was performed in 24/26 patients (92%). In the 2 remaining patients, chronic biliary infection (n = 1) and intraparenchymal hemorrhagic hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1) did not allow BLHM to be achieved. Bleeding during the BLHM procedure occurred in 1 patient (4%), with no need for interruption. MLHM was performed in all 28 patients, and in none of them was bleeding observed during the maneuver.

Conclusions: BLHM and MLHM are important technical refinements with several advantages. Feasibility rates were 92% and 100%, respectively. Bleeding risk remained low (4%) for BLHM and was 0% for MLHM. The rate of BLHM failure suggests that the feasibility rate may be higher in normal liver parenchyma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
悬挂手法在保留下腔静脉原位肝移植及肝脏外科手术中的可行性。
背景/目的:研究Belghiti肝悬挂手法(BLHM)在肝切除术中的可行性和并发症发生率,以及改良的肝悬挂手法(MLHM)在保留下腔静脉的原位肝移植(OLT)中的应用。方法:自2001年1月至2003年8月,对26例连续右肝切除术和28例保留下腔静脉的原位肝移植术分别进行BLHM和MLHM。结果:24/26例(92%)患者行BLHM。在剩下的2例患者中,慢性胆道感染(n = 1)和肝实质内出血性肝细胞癌(n = 1)不能实现BLHM。1例患者(4%)在BLHM过程中发生出血,无需中断。所有28例患者均行MLHM手术,术中未见出血。结论:BLHM和MLHM是重要的技术改进,具有许多优点。可行性分别为92%和100%。BLHM的出血风险仍然很低(4%),MLHM的出血风险为0%。BLHM的失败率表明,在正常肝实质中,BLHM的可行性可能更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection: technique, indications and results. Laparoscopic major hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: formidable challenge to standardization. Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Proceedings of a consensus meeting, April 2006, Tokyo, Japan. Treatment outcome of selective digestive decontamination and enteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Protective effects of a hibernation-inducer on hepatocyte injury induced by hypothermic preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1