Do indices of coronary conductance after reperfusion reflect the extent of salvaged myocardium?

Takahiro Shibata, Hisashi Watanabe, Tetsushi Tsurusaki, Kousuke Minai, Takayuki Ogawa, Keiji Iwano, Tetsutarou Tamura, Satoshi Yoshida, Makoto Mutou, Kamon Imai, Toshinobu Horie, Seibu Mochizuki
{"title":"Do indices of coronary conductance after reperfusion reflect the extent of salvaged myocardium?","authors":"Takahiro Shibata,&nbsp;Hisashi Watanabe,&nbsp;Tetsushi Tsurusaki,&nbsp;Kousuke Minai,&nbsp;Takayuki Ogawa,&nbsp;Keiji Iwano,&nbsp;Tetsutarou Tamura,&nbsp;Satoshi Yoshida,&nbsp;Makoto Mutou,&nbsp;Kamon Imai,&nbsp;Toshinobu Horie,&nbsp;Seibu Mochizuki","doi":"10.1536/jhj.45.387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing indices of coronary conductance (hyperemic flow-versus-pressure slope index, FPSI, and zero flow pressure, Pzf) have been developed as measures of microcoronary resistance. These indices, however, refer to cases of normal hearts, and there are no reports studying these indices following acute myocardial infarction. In this study, we investigated whether FPSI and Pzf truly measure the extent of myocardial salvage after successful reperfusion therapy. We also developed a new index of zero pressure flow, Fzp. Nineteen patients who underwent successful reperfusion therapy to the proximal portion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) were studied. After successful reperfusion therapy, a Doppler wire was placed into the LAD. Aortic pressure was recorded in real time. Results from the aortic pressure and flow meter were combined to produce FPSI, Pzf, and Fzp. All cases underwent a resting thallium (Tl) and BMIPP scintigram within five days of successful reperfusion therapy. Infarcted myocardium was estimated using a severity score calculated from the Tl scintigraphy (TlSS), and the BMIPP (BMIPPSS) was estimated using a severity score. Patients with a TlSS/BMIPPSS ratio of less than 0.4 were assigned to the successful salvage group (group S), while the others were assigned to the failed salvage group (group F). FPSI of group F was 1.91 +/- 0.26 m/sec and of group S was 0.92 +/- 0.43 m/sec (P < 0.01). Pzf of group F was 51 +/- 3 mmHg and of group S was 51 +/- 5 mmHg (NS). Fzp of group F was -98 +/- 16 cm/sec and of group S was -46 +/- 4 cm/sec (P < 0.05). FPSI and the new index of Fzp were useful in estimating the extent of myocardial salvage. Our results suggest that the Pzf index could not differentiate between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":14717,"journal":{"name":"Japanese heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.45.387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Existing indices of coronary conductance (hyperemic flow-versus-pressure slope index, FPSI, and zero flow pressure, Pzf) have been developed as measures of microcoronary resistance. These indices, however, refer to cases of normal hearts, and there are no reports studying these indices following acute myocardial infarction. In this study, we investigated whether FPSI and Pzf truly measure the extent of myocardial salvage after successful reperfusion therapy. We also developed a new index of zero pressure flow, Fzp. Nineteen patients who underwent successful reperfusion therapy to the proximal portion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) were studied. After successful reperfusion therapy, a Doppler wire was placed into the LAD. Aortic pressure was recorded in real time. Results from the aortic pressure and flow meter were combined to produce FPSI, Pzf, and Fzp. All cases underwent a resting thallium (Tl) and BMIPP scintigram within five days of successful reperfusion therapy. Infarcted myocardium was estimated using a severity score calculated from the Tl scintigraphy (TlSS), and the BMIPP (BMIPPSS) was estimated using a severity score. Patients with a TlSS/BMIPPSS ratio of less than 0.4 were assigned to the successful salvage group (group S), while the others were assigned to the failed salvage group (group F). FPSI of group F was 1.91 +/- 0.26 m/sec and of group S was 0.92 +/- 0.43 m/sec (P < 0.01). Pzf of group F was 51 +/- 3 mmHg and of group S was 51 +/- 5 mmHg (NS). Fzp of group F was -98 +/- 16 cm/sec and of group S was -46 +/- 4 cm/sec (P < 0.05). FPSI and the new index of Fzp were useful in estimating the extent of myocardial salvage. Our results suggest that the Pzf index could not differentiate between the two groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉再灌注后的冠状动脉传导指数是否反映心肌的恢复程度?
现有的冠状动脉传导指数(充血流量与压力斜率指数,FPSI,和零流量压力,Pzf)已被开发作为微冠状动脉阻力的测量指标。然而,这些指标是指正常心脏的情况,没有研究急性心肌梗死后这些指标的报道。在本研究中,我们研究了FPSI和Pzf是否真实地衡量了再灌注治疗成功后心肌恢复的程度。我们还开发了一个新的零压流量指标Fzp。我们对19例成功接受左前降支近端再灌注治疗的患者进行了研究。再灌注治疗成功后,将多普勒导线置入LAD。实时记录主动脉压。将主动脉压和血流仪的结果合并计算FPSI、Pzf和Fzp。所有病例均在再灌注治疗成功后5天内进行静息铊(Tl)和BMIPP闪烁图检测。使用TlSS计算的严重程度评分来估计梗死心肌,使用严重程度评分来估计BMIPP (BMIPPSS)。将TlSS/BMIPPSS比值小于0.4的患者归为抢救成功组(S组),其余归为抢救失败组(F组)。F组的FPSI为1.91 +/- 0.26 m/sec, S组的FPSI为0.92 +/- 0.43 m/sec (P < 0.01)。F组Pzf为51 +/- 3 mmHg, S组Pzf为51 +/- 5 mmHg (NS)。F组Fzp为-98 +/- 16 cm/sec, S组Fzp为-46 +/- 4 cm/sec (P < 0.05)。FPSI和新指标Fzp可用于评价心肌恢复程度。我们的结果表明,Pzf指数不能区分两组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of intermittent with continuous simvastatin treatment in hypercholesterolemic patients with end stage renal failure. Effects of statins on circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The effects of atorvastatin treatment on the fibrinolytic system in dyslipidemic patients. Concentrations of hepatocyte growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor in pericardial fluid and plasma. Association between mitral annular calcification and stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1