Comparison of exercise QRS amplitude changes in patients with slow coronary flow versus significant coronary stenosis.

Muhsin Turkmen, Irfan Barutcu, Ali Metin Esen, Osman Karakaya, Ozlem Esen, Yelda Basaran
{"title":"Comparison of exercise QRS amplitude changes in patients with slow coronary flow versus significant coronary stenosis.","authors":"Muhsin Turkmen,&nbsp;Irfan Barutcu,&nbsp;Ali Metin Esen,&nbsp;Osman Karakaya,&nbsp;Ozlem Esen,&nbsp;Yelda Basaran","doi":"10.1536/jhj.45.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exercise Q, R, and S wave amplitude changes, called the QRS score, have been reported to be a marker of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Therefore, in this study, using the exercise QRS score, we sought to determine if slow coronary flow (SCF) phenomenon is associated with the exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. This retrospective study included 23 patients evaluated for suspected coronary artery disease and found to have SCF (group I) and 19 subjects with angiographically-defined significant coronary artery stenosis (group II). All study subjects underwent treadmill exercise testing using the modified Bruce protocol. For each subject the amplitude of the Q, R, and S waves in leads aVF and V5 was measured manually using calipers before and immediately after exercise. The QRS score was calculated by subtracting the Q, R, and S wave differences in leads aVF and V5. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to demographic properties. The peak heart rate achieved, baseline and peak systolic-diastolic blood pressure, exercise duration, and the metabolic equivalent values were similar in both groups. The maximum ST-segment depression ratio was significantly lower in patients with SCF than those of significant coronary stenosis (0.8 +/- 0.4 vs 1.3 +/- 0.5 P = 0.001, respectively). However, the exercise QRS score was found to be similar in both groups (3.3 +/- 2.3 vs 2.1 +/- 3.0 P = 0.2, respectively). The data suggest that SCF phenomenon may alone lead to myocardial ischemia even in the absence of obstructed major epicardial coronary arteries as detected by similar exercise QRS scores to those of significant coronary artery stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14717,"journal":{"name":"Japanese heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1536/jhj.45.419","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.45.419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Exercise Q, R, and S wave amplitude changes, called the QRS score, have been reported to be a marker of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Therefore, in this study, using the exercise QRS score, we sought to determine if slow coronary flow (SCF) phenomenon is associated with the exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. This retrospective study included 23 patients evaluated for suspected coronary artery disease and found to have SCF (group I) and 19 subjects with angiographically-defined significant coronary artery stenosis (group II). All study subjects underwent treadmill exercise testing using the modified Bruce protocol. For each subject the amplitude of the Q, R, and S waves in leads aVF and V5 was measured manually using calipers before and immediately after exercise. The QRS score was calculated by subtracting the Q, R, and S wave differences in leads aVF and V5. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to demographic properties. The peak heart rate achieved, baseline and peak systolic-diastolic blood pressure, exercise duration, and the metabolic equivalent values were similar in both groups. The maximum ST-segment depression ratio was significantly lower in patients with SCF than those of significant coronary stenosis (0.8 +/- 0.4 vs 1.3 +/- 0.5 P = 0.001, respectively). However, the exercise QRS score was found to be similar in both groups (3.3 +/- 2.3 vs 2.1 +/- 3.0 P = 0.2, respectively). The data suggest that SCF phenomenon may alone lead to myocardial ischemia even in the absence of obstructed major epicardial coronary arteries as detected by similar exercise QRS scores to those of significant coronary artery stenosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠脉血流缓慢与冠脉明显狭窄患者运动QRS振幅变化的比较。
运动Q、R和S波振幅变化,称为QRS评分,已被报道为运动引起的心肌缺血的标志。因此,在本研究中,我们试图通过运动QRS评分来确定慢冠状动脉血流(SCF)现象是否与运动引起的心肌缺血有关。本回顾性研究包括23例疑似冠状动脉疾病并发现有SCF的患者(I组)和19例血管造影确定有明显冠状动脉狭窄的患者(II组)。所有研究对象均采用改进的Bruce方案进行跑步机运动测试。每个受试者在运动前和运动后立即用卡尺手动测量导联aVF和V5的Q、R和S波振幅。QRS评分是通过减去导联aVF和V5的Q、R和S波差来计算的。两组在人口统计学属性方面没有差异。两组的峰值心率、基线和峰值收缩压-舒张压、运动时间和代谢当量值相似。SCF患者的最大st段压低比明显低于冠脉狭窄患者(分别为0.8 +/- 0.4 vs 1.3 +/- 0.5 P = 0.001)。然而,两组的运动QRS评分相似(分别为3.3 +/- 2.3 vs 2.1 +/- 3.0 P = 0.2)。这些数据表明,即使在没有主要心外膜冠状动脉阻塞的情况下,与冠状动脉明显狭窄的运动QRS评分相似,SCF现象也可能单独导致心肌缺血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of intermittent with continuous simvastatin treatment in hypercholesterolemic patients with end stage renal failure. Effects of statins on circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The effects of atorvastatin treatment on the fibrinolytic system in dyslipidemic patients. Concentrations of hepatocyte growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor in pericardial fluid and plasma. Association between mitral annular calcification and stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1