Factors influencing clinical applications of endoscopic balloon dilation for benign esophageal strictures.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy Pub Date : 2004-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-2004-814520
Y-C Chiu, C-C Hsu, K-W Chiu, S-K Chuah, C-S Changchien, K-L Wu, Y-P Chou
{"title":"Factors influencing clinical applications of endoscopic balloon dilation for benign esophageal strictures.","authors":"Y-C Chiu,&nbsp;C-C Hsu,&nbsp;K-W Chiu,&nbsp;S-K Chuah,&nbsp;C-S Changchien,&nbsp;K-L Wu,&nbsp;Y-P Chou","doi":"10.1055/s-2004-814520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and clinical effectiveness of a controlled radial expansion (CRE) balloon catheter in dilating benign esophageal strictures, and to assess factors influencing the effectiveness of this procedure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From February 2000 to June 2002, 25 patients with documented benign esophageal strictures at our hospital were enrolled and treated with CRE balloon dilation. There were 17 men and eight women, with ages ranging from 30 to 82 years. The average age of the enrolled patients was 56.1 years. All of the strictures were dilated using CRE dilators under direct visualization, without fluoroscopic monitoring. The dilation diameters were planned in series up to 15 mm using a \"rule of three\". If dysphagia and esophageal strictures recurred during the clinical follow-up after completion of a series of dilations, additional dilation was carried out until symptomatic relief was achieved. Effective treatment was defined as the ability of patients with or without repeated dilations to maintain a solid or semisolid diet for more than 12 months. Depending on the effectiveness and duration of treatment, the patients were divided into three groups: group A, the successful group in which the initial series of dilations was effective without the need for any additional dilation for recurrent strictures or dysphagia; group B, the relapse group, in which the initial series of dilations was effective, but additional dilations were needed due to recurrent strictures or dysphagia; and group C, the group in which the initial series of dilations failed or consecutive dilations could not be carried out due to intolerance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 25 patients received a total of 95 sessions of dilation (3.8 +/- 1.2 sessions per patient). There were 11 patients in group A, 11 patients in group B, and three patients in group C. The median follow-up period was 16.5 months (range 12 - 32 months). The number of initial dilations required to achieve symptomatic relief showed a negative correlation with the pre-dilation diameter of the strictures ( r = - 0.92, P < 0.01). Thinner strictures required more dilations before symptomatic relief was achieved. In addition, the stricture length in group B (5.4 +/- 3.4 cm) was significantly longer than that in group A (2.6 +/- 1.1 cm) ( P = 0.009). The overall success rate was 88 % (22 of 25), including 100 % in the 21 patients with a stricture length of less than 8 cm and 25 % in the four patients with a stricture length more than 8 cm ( P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRE balloon dilation without fluoroscopy is an effective treatment for esophageal strictures less than 8 cm in length. Pre-dilation diameter and stricture length are factors that influence the numbers of dilations required and the need for additional dilations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11516,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2004-814520","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-814520","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

Background and study aims: The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and clinical effectiveness of a controlled radial expansion (CRE) balloon catheter in dilating benign esophageal strictures, and to assess factors influencing the effectiveness of this procedure.

Patients and methods: From February 2000 to June 2002, 25 patients with documented benign esophageal strictures at our hospital were enrolled and treated with CRE balloon dilation. There were 17 men and eight women, with ages ranging from 30 to 82 years. The average age of the enrolled patients was 56.1 years. All of the strictures were dilated using CRE dilators under direct visualization, without fluoroscopic monitoring. The dilation diameters were planned in series up to 15 mm using a "rule of three". If dysphagia and esophageal strictures recurred during the clinical follow-up after completion of a series of dilations, additional dilation was carried out until symptomatic relief was achieved. Effective treatment was defined as the ability of patients with or without repeated dilations to maintain a solid or semisolid diet for more than 12 months. Depending on the effectiveness and duration of treatment, the patients were divided into three groups: group A, the successful group in which the initial series of dilations was effective without the need for any additional dilation for recurrent strictures or dysphagia; group B, the relapse group, in which the initial series of dilations was effective, but additional dilations were needed due to recurrent strictures or dysphagia; and group C, the group in which the initial series of dilations failed or consecutive dilations could not be carried out due to intolerance.

Results: The 25 patients received a total of 95 sessions of dilation (3.8 +/- 1.2 sessions per patient). There were 11 patients in group A, 11 patients in group B, and three patients in group C. The median follow-up period was 16.5 months (range 12 - 32 months). The number of initial dilations required to achieve symptomatic relief showed a negative correlation with the pre-dilation diameter of the strictures ( r = - 0.92, P < 0.01). Thinner strictures required more dilations before symptomatic relief was achieved. In addition, the stricture length in group B (5.4 +/- 3.4 cm) was significantly longer than that in group A (2.6 +/- 1.1 cm) ( P = 0.009). The overall success rate was 88 % (22 of 25), including 100 % in the 21 patients with a stricture length of less than 8 cm and 25 % in the four patients with a stricture length more than 8 cm ( P = 0.02).

Conclusions: CRE balloon dilation without fluoroscopy is an effective treatment for esophageal strictures less than 8 cm in length. Pre-dilation diameter and stricture length are factors that influence the numbers of dilations required and the need for additional dilations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响内镜下球囊扩张治疗食管良性狭窄临床应用的因素。
背景与研究目的:本研究的目的是探讨可控径向扩张球囊导管(CRE)扩张良性食管狭窄的安全性和临床有效性,并评估影响该方法有效性的因素。患者和方法:从2000年2月至2002年6月,我们收集了25例经证实为良性食管狭窄的患者,并采用CRE球囊扩张治疗。有17名男性和8名女性,年龄从30岁到82岁不等。入组患者的平均年龄为56.1岁。在无透视监测的情况下,直接使用CRE扩张器对所有狭窄进行扩张。使用“三法则”,计划膨胀直径系列至15mm。如果吞咽困难和食管狭窄在完成一系列扩张后的临床随访中复发,则进行额外的扩张,直到症状缓解。有效治疗被定义为有或没有反复扩张的患者维持固体或半固体饮食超过12个月的能力。根据治疗的有效性和持续时间,患者被分为三组:A组,成功的一组,其中最初的一系列扩张是有效的,不需要任何额外的扩张来治疗复发性狭窄或吞咽困难;B组为复发组,最初的一系列扩张是有效的,但由于复发性狭窄或吞咽困难需要额外的扩张;C组,最初的一系列扩张失败或连续的扩张由于不耐受而不能进行。结果:25例患者共接受了95次扩张术(每位患者3.8 +/- 1.2次)。A组11例,B组11例,c组3例。中位随访时间16.5个月(12 ~ 32个月)。达到症状缓解所需的初始扩张次数与狭窄预扩张直径呈负相关(r = - 0.92, P < 0.01)。较薄的狭窄需要更多的扩张才能达到症状缓解。B组狭窄长度(5.4 +/- 3.4 cm)明显长于A组(2.6 +/- 1.1 cm) (P = 0.009)。总成功率为88%(22 / 25),其中狭窄长度小于8cm的21例为100%,狭窄长度大于8cm的4例为25% (P = 0.02)。结论:无透视CRE球囊扩张术是治疗长度小于8cm食管狭窄的有效方法。预扩张直径和狭窄长度是影响所需扩张次数和需要额外扩张的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy
Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
1401
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Endoscopy is a leading journal covering the latest technologies and global advancements in gastrointestinal endoscopy. With guidance from an international editorial board, it delivers high-quality content catering to the needs of endoscopists, surgeons, clinicians, and researchers worldwide. Publishing 12 issues each year, Endoscopy offers top-quality review articles, original contributions, prospective studies, surveys of diagnostic and therapeutic advances, and comprehensive coverage of key national and international meetings. Additionally, articles often include supplementary online video content.
期刊最新文献
A key to unlocking the door: water pressure method for endoscopic submucosal dissection of a superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor with a history of multiple biopsies. Access to the left intrahepatic bile duct using an endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous technique. An unusual complication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of a giant cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst. Anorectal melanoma presenting as a polypoid lesion. Anti-reflux mucosal ablation for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1