Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA B*5701 genotyping in preventing abacavir hypersensitivity.

Dyfrig A Hughes, F Javier Vilar, Charlotte C Ward, Ana Alfirevic, B Kevin Park, Munir Pirmohamed
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA B*5701 genotyping in preventing abacavir hypersensitivity.","authors":"Dyfrig A Hughes,&nbsp;F Javier Vilar,&nbsp;Charlotte C Ward,&nbsp;Ana Alfirevic,&nbsp;B Kevin Park,&nbsp;Munir Pirmohamed","doi":"10.1097/00008571-200406000-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE Abacavir, a human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) nucleoside-analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, causes severe hypersensitivity in 4-8% of patients. HLA B*5701 is a known genetic risk factor for abacavir hypersensitivity in Caucasians. Our aim was to confirm the presence of this genetic factor in our patients, and to determine whether genotyping for HLA B*5701 would be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources. METHODS Patients with and without abacavir hypersensitivity were identified from a UK HIV clinic. Patients were genotyped for HLA B*5701, and pooled data used for calculation of test characteristics. The cost-effectiveness analysis incorporated the cost of testing, cost of treating abacavir hypersensitivity, and the cost and selection of alternative antiretroviral regimens. A probabilistic decision analytic model (comparing testing versus no testing) was formulated and Monte Carlo simulations performed. RESULTS Of the abacavir hypersensitive patients, six (46%) were HLA B*5701 positive, compared to five (10%) of the non-hypersensitive patients (odds ratio 7.9 [95% confidence intervals 1.5-41.4], P = 0.006). Pooling of our data on HLA B*5701 with published data resulted in a pooled odds ratio of 29 (95% CI 6.4-132.3; P < 0.0001). The cost-effectiveness model demonstrated that depending on the choice of comparator, routine testing for HLA B*5701 ranged from being a dominant strategy (less expensive and more beneficial than not testing) to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (versus no testing) of Euro 22,811 per hypersensitivity reaction avoided. CONCLUSIONS Abacavir hypersensitivity is associated with HLA B*5701, and pre-prescription pharmacogenetic testing for this appears to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources.","PeriodicalId":19917,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenetics","volume":"14 6","pages":"335-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00008571-200406000-00002","citationCount":"270","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008571-200406000-00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 270

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Abacavir, a human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) nucleoside-analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, causes severe hypersensitivity in 4-8% of patients. HLA B*5701 is a known genetic risk factor for abacavir hypersensitivity in Caucasians. Our aim was to confirm the presence of this genetic factor in our patients, and to determine whether genotyping for HLA B*5701 would be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources. METHODS Patients with and without abacavir hypersensitivity were identified from a UK HIV clinic. Patients were genotyped for HLA B*5701, and pooled data used for calculation of test characteristics. The cost-effectiveness analysis incorporated the cost of testing, cost of treating abacavir hypersensitivity, and the cost and selection of alternative antiretroviral regimens. A probabilistic decision analytic model (comparing testing versus no testing) was formulated and Monte Carlo simulations performed. RESULTS Of the abacavir hypersensitive patients, six (46%) were HLA B*5701 positive, compared to five (10%) of the non-hypersensitive patients (odds ratio 7.9 [95% confidence intervals 1.5-41.4], P = 0.006). Pooling of our data on HLA B*5701 with published data resulted in a pooled odds ratio of 29 (95% CI 6.4-132.3; P < 0.0001). The cost-effectiveness model demonstrated that depending on the choice of comparator, routine testing for HLA B*5701 ranged from being a dominant strategy (less expensive and more beneficial than not testing) to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (versus no testing) of Euro 22,811 per hypersensitivity reaction avoided. CONCLUSIONS Abacavir hypersensitivity is associated with HLA B*5701, and pre-prescription pharmacogenetic testing for this appears to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HLA B*5701基因分型预防阿巴卡韦过敏的成本-效果分析。
目的:阿巴卡韦是一种人类免疫缺陷病毒-1 (HIV-1)核苷类似物逆转录酶抑制剂,在4-8%的患者中引起严重的超敏反应。HLA B*5701是白种人阿巴卡韦过敏的已知遗传危险因素。我们的目的是确认患者中存在这种遗传因素,并确定HLA B*5701基因分型是否具有成本效益。方法:从英国HIV诊所鉴定有和没有阿巴卡韦超敏反应的患者。对患者进行HLA B*5701基因分型,合并数据计算检验特征。成本-效果分析包括检测成本、治疗阿巴卡韦超敏反应的成本以及替代抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的成本和选择。制定了一个概率决策分析模型(比较测试与不测试),并进行了蒙特卡罗模拟。结果:阿巴卡韦过敏患者HLA B*5701阳性6例(46%),非过敏患者HLA B*5701阳性5例(10%)(优势比7.9[95%可信区间1.5 ~ 41.4],P = 0.006)。将我们关于HLA B*5701的数据与已发表的数据进行汇总,合并优势比为29 (95% CI 6.4-132.3;P < 0.0001)。成本-效果模型表明,根据比较国的选择,常规HLA B*5701检测从主要策略(比不检测更便宜和更有益)到增量成本-效果比(与不检测相比),每个避免的超敏反应为22,811欧元。结论:阿巴卡韦超敏反应与HLA B*5701有关,处方前药物遗传检测似乎是一种具有成本效益的医疗资源利用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In Silico Studies on Pharmacokinetics and Neuroprotective Potential of 25Mg2+: Releasing Nanocationites - Background and Perspectives Introductory Chapter: Pharmacogenetics Pharmacogenomics of “Core” Essential Medicines Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and response to fluorouracil-based treatment in advanced colorectal cancer patients. The human serotonin receptor 2B: coding region polymorphisms and association with vulnerability to illegal drug abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1