Robot-assisted general surgery.

Jeffrey W Hazey, W Scott Melvin
{"title":"Robot-assisted general surgery.","authors":"Jeffrey W Hazey,&nbsp;W Scott Melvin","doi":"10.1177/107155170401100207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the initiation of laparoscopic techniques in general surgery, we have seen a significant expansion of minimally invasive techniques in the last 16 years. More recently, robotic-assisted laparoscopy has moved into the general surgeon's armamentarium to address some of the shortcomings of laparoscopic surgery. AESOP (Computer Motion, Goleta, CA) addressed the issue of visualization as a robotic camera holder. With the introduction of the ZEUS robotic surgical system (Computer Motion), the ability to remotely operate laparoscopic instruments became a reality. US Food and Drug Administration approval in July 2000 of the da Vinci robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) further defined the ability of a robotic-assist device to address limitations in laparoscopy. This includes a significant improvement in instrument dexterity, dampening of natural hand tremors, three-dimensional visualization, ergonomics, and camera stability. As experience with robotic technology increased and its applications to advanced laparoscopic procedures have become more understood, more procedures have been performed with robotic assistance. Numerous studies have shown equivalent or improved patient outcomes when robotic-assist devices are used. Initially, robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy was deemed safe, and now robotics has been shown to be safe in foregut procedures, including Nissen fundoplication, Heller myotomy, gastric banding procedures, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. These techniques have been extrapolated to solid-organ procedures (splenectomy, adrenalectomy, and pancreatic surgery) as well as robotic-assisted laparoscopic colectomy. In this chapter, we review the evolution of robotic technology and its applications in general surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":79535,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in laparoscopic surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"107-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/107155170401100207","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in laparoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/107155170401100207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

With the initiation of laparoscopic techniques in general surgery, we have seen a significant expansion of minimally invasive techniques in the last 16 years. More recently, robotic-assisted laparoscopy has moved into the general surgeon's armamentarium to address some of the shortcomings of laparoscopic surgery. AESOP (Computer Motion, Goleta, CA) addressed the issue of visualization as a robotic camera holder. With the introduction of the ZEUS robotic surgical system (Computer Motion), the ability to remotely operate laparoscopic instruments became a reality. US Food and Drug Administration approval in July 2000 of the da Vinci robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) further defined the ability of a robotic-assist device to address limitations in laparoscopy. This includes a significant improvement in instrument dexterity, dampening of natural hand tremors, three-dimensional visualization, ergonomics, and camera stability. As experience with robotic technology increased and its applications to advanced laparoscopic procedures have become more understood, more procedures have been performed with robotic assistance. Numerous studies have shown equivalent or improved patient outcomes when robotic-assist devices are used. Initially, robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy was deemed safe, and now robotics has been shown to be safe in foregut procedures, including Nissen fundoplication, Heller myotomy, gastric banding procedures, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. These techniques have been extrapolated to solid-organ procedures (splenectomy, adrenalectomy, and pancreatic surgery) as well as robotic-assisted laparoscopic colectomy. In this chapter, we review the evolution of robotic technology and its applications in general surgical procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助的普通外科手术。
随着腹腔镜技术在普通外科手术中的应用,我们在过去的16年里看到了微创技术的显著扩展。最近,机器人辅助腹腔镜手术已经进入普通外科医生的装备,以解决腹腔镜手术的一些缺点。AESOP (Computer Motion, Goleta, CA)解决了作为机器人相机支架的可视化问题。随着ZEUS机器人手术系统(Computer Motion)的引入,远程操作腹腔镜仪器的能力成为现实。美国食品和药物管理局于2000年7月批准了达芬奇机器人手术系统(Intuitive surgical, Sunnyvale, CA),进一步定义了机器人辅助设备解决腹腔镜检查局限性的能力。这包括仪器灵巧性的显著改善,抑制自然手部震颤,三维可视化,人体工程学和相机稳定性。随着机器人技术经验的增加及其在高级腹腔镜手术中的应用越来越为人所理解,越来越多的手术都是在机器人的帮助下进行的。大量研究表明,当使用机器人辅助设备时,患者的治疗效果相同或有所改善。最初,机器人辅助的腹腔镜胆囊切除术被认为是安全的,现在机器人已被证明在前肠手术中是安全的,包括Nissen底折叠、Heller肌切开术、胃束带手术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术。这些技术已经被推广到实体器官手术(脾切除术、肾上腺切除术和胰腺手术)以及机器人辅助的腹腔镜结肠切除术。在本章中,我们回顾了机器人技术的发展及其在普通外科手术中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concluding Remarks. Clinical value of intra-operative ultrasonography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Minimally invasive esophageal resection. The massive hiatal hernia: dealing with the defect. The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1