Why, which, how, who, when? A personal view of smallpox vaccination for the 2000s.

P P Mortimer
{"title":"Why, which, how, who, when? A personal view of smallpox vaccination for the 2000s.","authors":"P P Mortimer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The uncertainty about the extent of proliferation of smallpox virus holdings since the early 1990s, and particularly whether terrorist groups or so-called rogue states might now hold the virus, confronts potential target countries with a continuing dilemma. An increasingly large majority of their populations have never been vaccinated, and those who have been vaccinated may have become susceptible to smallpox again. Yet recent attempts by the United States and other governments to persuade large numbers of key personnel and others to accept vaccination have at least partially failed and a different long-term strategy is needed. This strategy should be based on surveillance of rash illnesses, improved public education, more refined contingency planning and a new approach to smallpox vaccination. The last should if possible be based on cell-grown, less reactogenic vaccines, even though it may be some years before these can become available. Meanwhile this article examines other expedients including the use of existing lymph vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":72640,"journal":{"name":"Communicable disease and public health","volume":"7 2","pages":"145-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable disease and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The uncertainty about the extent of proliferation of smallpox virus holdings since the early 1990s, and particularly whether terrorist groups or so-called rogue states might now hold the virus, confronts potential target countries with a continuing dilemma. An increasingly large majority of their populations have never been vaccinated, and those who have been vaccinated may have become susceptible to smallpox again. Yet recent attempts by the United States and other governments to persuade large numbers of key personnel and others to accept vaccination have at least partially failed and a different long-term strategy is needed. This strategy should be based on surveillance of rash illnesses, improved public education, more refined contingency planning and a new approach to smallpox vaccination. The last should if possible be based on cell-grown, less reactogenic vaccines, even though it may be some years before these can become available. Meanwhile this article examines other expedients including the use of existing lymph vaccines.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么,哪一个,怎样,谁,什么时候?个人对2000年代天花疫苗接种的看法。
自20世纪90年代初以来,关于天花病毒扩散程度的不确定性,特别是恐怖组织或所谓的流氓国家现在是否可能持有该病毒,使潜在目标国家面临持续的困境。越来越多的人口从未接种过疫苗,而那些接种过疫苗的人可能会再次对天花易感。然而,美国和其他国家政府最近试图说服大量关键人员和其他人接受疫苗接种的努力至少部分失败了,需要一种不同的长期战略。这一战略应基于对皮疹疾病的监测、改进的公共教育、更完善的应急计划和天花疫苗接种的新方法。如果可能的话,最后一种疫苗应该基于细胞生长的、反应性较低的疫苗,尽管这些疫苗可能需要几年时间才能问世。同时,本文探讨了其他权宜之计,包括使用现有的淋巴疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What should we measure: infection or infection control? Accountability for health protection in England: how this has been affected by the establishment of the Health Protection Agency. Evaluation of peer review of infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in four acute care trusts in the East of England. Surveillance of antenatal infections--HIV, hepatitis B, syphilis and rubella susceptibility in London. How complete and accurate is meningococcal disease notification?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1