Effects of delayed (24 h postintervention) β-irradiation therapy after coronary angioplasty and stenting in de novo native coronary artery lesions

J Kalef-Ezra , L Michalis , G Bozios , P Tsekeris , C.S Katsouras , K Naka , C Pappas , D.A Sideris
{"title":"Effects of delayed (24 h postintervention) β-irradiation therapy after coronary angioplasty and stenting in de novo native coronary artery lesions","authors":"J Kalef-Ezra ,&nbsp;L Michalis ,&nbsp;G Bozios ,&nbsp;P Tsekeris ,&nbsp;C.S Katsouras ,&nbsp;K Naka ,&nbsp;C Pappas ,&nbsp;D.A Sideris","doi":"10.1016/j.carrad.2003.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The effects of brachytherapy performed 24 h postintervention in de novo native coronary artery lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><p>Thirty-nine patients with 39 de novo coronary artery lesions were randomised to prompt (immediately after intervention, <em>n</em>=21) or delayed (24 h later, <em>n</em>=18) beta brachytherapy (<sup>90</sup>Sr/<sup>90</sup>Y) after been successfully revascularized with stenting. Clinical follow-up data up to 21 months (median time) were compared. After irradiation and at 6-month follow-up, paired volumetric analysis of the stented segment and the 5-mm proximal and distal reference segments was performed; this included measurements of the external elastic membrane, lumen, plaque, and media (external elastic membrane minus lumen), stent and intima hyperplasia (stent minus lumen).</p><p>Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the two groups. Postintervention measurements of stent, lumen, and intima hyperplasia volumes as well as postintervention minimum lumen cross-sectional areas were not different. In the stented segments and in the segments 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent, similar changes of all IVUS measurements were measured in the two patient groups, but in the lumen volume at the proximal stent edge of patients irradiated 24 h postinjury. At 21 months median follow-up time, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 8 patients (38%) in the prompt irradiation group compared with 3 (17%) in the delayed (<em>P</em>=.17).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Beta irradiation is similarly effective whether performed immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention or 24 h later.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80261,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 176-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.carrad.2003.12.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1522186503001951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

The effects of brachytherapy performed 24 h postintervention in de novo native coronary artery lesions.

Methods and Results

Thirty-nine patients with 39 de novo coronary artery lesions were randomised to prompt (immediately after intervention, n=21) or delayed (24 h later, n=18) beta brachytherapy (90Sr/90Y) after been successfully revascularized with stenting. Clinical follow-up data up to 21 months (median time) were compared. After irradiation and at 6-month follow-up, paired volumetric analysis of the stented segment and the 5-mm proximal and distal reference segments was performed; this included measurements of the external elastic membrane, lumen, plaque, and media (external elastic membrane minus lumen), stent and intima hyperplasia (stent minus lumen).

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the two groups. Postintervention measurements of stent, lumen, and intima hyperplasia volumes as well as postintervention minimum lumen cross-sectional areas were not different. In the stented segments and in the segments 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent, similar changes of all IVUS measurements were measured in the two patient groups, but in the lumen volume at the proximal stent edge of patients irradiated 24 h postinjury. At 21 months median follow-up time, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 8 patients (38%) in the prompt irradiation group compared with 3 (17%) in the delayed (P=.17).

Conclusion

Beta irradiation is similarly effective whether performed immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention or 24 h later.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉成形术和支架置入术后延迟(干预后24小时)β照射治疗对新生原生冠状动脉病变的影响
背景:介入治疗后24小时进行近距离治疗对新发原生冠状动脉病变的影响。方法和结果39例新发冠状动脉病变患者在支架置入术成功后,随机分为立即(干预后,n=21)或延迟(24小时后,n=18) β近距离治疗(90Sr/90Y)。临床随访数据长达21个月(中位时间)进行比较。照射后和6个月的随访,对支架段和5mm近端和远端参考段进行配对体积分析;这包括测量外弹性膜、管腔、斑块和介质(外弹性膜减去管腔)、支架和内膜增生(支架减去管腔)。两组患者的基线临床和血管造影特征相似。干预后测量支架、管腔和内膜增生体积以及干预后最小管腔截面积没有差异。在支架段和离支架近端和远端5mm段中,两组患者的所有IVUS测量值变化相似,但在损伤后24 h照射的患者的支架近端边缘管腔容积变化不同。在中位随访时间21个月时,及时照射组有8例(38%)患者行了靶病变血运重建术(TLR),而延迟照射组有3例(17%)患者行TLR (P= 0.17)。结论经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后即刻或24 h后进行β照射均具有相同的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts No change in endothelial-dependent vasomotion late after coronary irradiation Clinical and angiographic outcomes of cardiac transplant patients treated with intracoronary beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis Brachytherapy with gamma radiation of a coronary artery for in-stent restenosis may induce the regression of in-stent restenosis of an adjacent coronary artery without angioplasty. First case report and review of the literature Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease: before or after coronary surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1