Angiographic restenosis following intravascular β-brachytherapy does not correlate with delivered dose: a study with dose volume histograms

Adam Witkowski , Jerzy Prȩgowski , Gary S. Mintz , Zbigniew Chmielak , Łukasz Kalińczuk , Jarosl̷aw Łyczek , Maria Kawczyńska , Wojciech Bulski , Anna Kulik , Cezary Kȩpka , Mariusz Kruk , Tomasz Deptuch , Jacek Owczarczyk , Stanisl̷aw Pszona , Witold Rużyl̷l̷o
{"title":"Angiographic restenosis following intravascular β-brachytherapy does not correlate with delivered dose: a study with dose volume histograms","authors":"Adam Witkowski ,&nbsp;Jerzy Prȩgowski ,&nbsp;Gary S. Mintz ,&nbsp;Zbigniew Chmielak ,&nbsp;Łukasz Kalińczuk ,&nbsp;Jarosl̷aw Łyczek ,&nbsp;Maria Kawczyńska ,&nbsp;Wojciech Bulski ,&nbsp;Anna Kulik ,&nbsp;Cezary Kȩpka ,&nbsp;Mariusz Kruk ,&nbsp;Tomasz Deptuch ,&nbsp;Jacek Owczarczyk ,&nbsp;Stanisl̷aw Pszona ,&nbsp;Witold Rużyl̷l̷o","doi":"10.1016/j.carrad.2004.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Vascular brachytherapy reduces recurrence after treatment of in-stent restenosis. However, there are still failures. The aims of the study were to investigate the relationship between two distinct dose prescriptions and the calculated dose delivered versus binary angiographic restenosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Fifty-five lesions in 47 patients underwent catheter-based β-brachytherapy with a <sup>32</sup>P source. Doses delivered were calculated using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements. Patients randomly received 20 Gy either at 1 mm beyond mean reference lumen or 1 mm beyond mean reference external elastic membrane. Using subsequent offline volumetric IVUS measurements, dose volume histograms (DVHs) for the adventitia were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 13 restenotic lesions including four total occlusions. All recurrences localized within stented segment. The frequency of restenosis was similar between dosimetry groups (20% vs. 28%; <em>P</em>=.5). DVH calculations were similar in restenotic versus restenosis-free lesions. However, postprocedural IVUS minimal lumen area was significantly smaller for lesions that recurred (5.03±1.19 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. 6.13±1.7 mm<sup>2</sup>; <em>P</em>=.042).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Calculated cumulative doses delivered to the tissues do not correlate with clinical outcome. However, an adequate lumen may be important to accommodate even a small amount of recurrent intimal hyperplasia to limit restenosis and need for target lesion revascularization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80261,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 192-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.carrad.2004.03.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1522186504000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Vascular brachytherapy reduces recurrence after treatment of in-stent restenosis. However, there are still failures. The aims of the study were to investigate the relationship between two distinct dose prescriptions and the calculated dose delivered versus binary angiographic restenosis.

Methods and Materials

Fifty-five lesions in 47 patients underwent catheter-based β-brachytherapy with a 32P source. Doses delivered were calculated using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements. Patients randomly received 20 Gy either at 1 mm beyond mean reference lumen or 1 mm beyond mean reference external elastic membrane. Using subsequent offline volumetric IVUS measurements, dose volume histograms (DVHs) for the adventitia were determined.

Results

There were 13 restenotic lesions including four total occlusions. All recurrences localized within stented segment. The frequency of restenosis was similar between dosimetry groups (20% vs. 28%; P=.5). DVH calculations were similar in restenotic versus restenosis-free lesions. However, postprocedural IVUS minimal lumen area was significantly smaller for lesions that recurred (5.03±1.19 mm2 vs. 6.13±1.7 mm2; P=.042).

Conclusions

Calculated cumulative doses delivered to the tissues do not correlate with clinical outcome. However, an adequate lumen may be important to accommodate even a small amount of recurrent intimal hyperplasia to limit restenosis and need for target lesion revascularization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管内β-近距离放疗后血管造影再狭窄与递送剂量无关:一项剂量-体积直方图研究
血管近距离放疗可减少支架内再狭窄治疗后的复发。然而,仍然有失败。该研究的目的是研究两种不同剂量处方和计算剂量与二元血管造影再狭窄之间的关系。方法与材料对47例55个病变患者行32P源β-近距离导管放射治疗。使用血管内超声(IVUS)测量计算剂量。患者随机接受20 Gy,在平均参考管腔外1 mm处或平均参考外弹性膜外1 mm处。使用随后的离线体积IVUS测量,确定了外膜的剂量体积直方图(DVHs)。结果再狭窄病变13例,其中全闭塞4例。所有复发均局限于支架段内。再狭窄的频率在剂量组之间相似(20% vs 28%;P = 0。5)。再狭窄与无再狭窄病变的DVH计算结果相似。然而,术后IVUS最小管腔面积明显小于复发病变(5.03±1.19 mm2 vs. 6.13±1.7 mm2;P = .042)。结论计算的组织累积剂量与临床结果无关。然而,足够的管腔对于容纳少量复发性内膜增生以限制再狭窄和对靶病变血运重建的需要可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts No change in endothelial-dependent vasomotion late after coronary irradiation Clinical and angiographic outcomes of cardiac transplant patients treated with intracoronary beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis Brachytherapy with gamma radiation of a coronary artery for in-stent restenosis may induce the regression of in-stent restenosis of an adjacent coronary artery without angioplasty. First case report and review of the literature Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease: before or after coronary surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1