Is carotid atherosclerosis more important in patients with mitral annular calcification than in those without?

Basri Amasyali, Sedat Kose, Kudret Aytemir, Nadir Barindik, Mutlu Saglam, Ayhan Kilic, Gulcan Abali, Atila Iyisoy, Hurkan Kursaklioglu, Ersoy Isik
{"title":"Is carotid atherosclerosis more important in patients with mitral annular calcification than in those without?","authors":"Basri Amasyali,&nbsp;Sedat Kose,&nbsp;Kudret Aytemir,&nbsp;Nadir Barindik,&nbsp;Mutlu Saglam,&nbsp;Ayhan Kilic,&nbsp;Gulcan Abali,&nbsp;Atila Iyisoy,&nbsp;Hurkan Kursaklioglu,&nbsp;Ersoy Isik","doi":"10.1536/jhj.45.603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been suggested that mitral annular calcification (MAC) may be a manifestation of generalized atherosclerosis. However, how the incidence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) are affected by the coexistence of carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) in patients with versus without MAC have not yet been studied. We studied 101 patients with echocardiographic MAC and 52 controls without MAC to investigate the clinical impact of CAS on the frequency and severity (defined as the number of obstructed vessels) of CAD in patients with MAC. Carotid Doppler ultrasonographic examination was performed on all patients before coronary angiography. In patients with both MAC and CAS, the incidences of CAD and multivessel disease (> or = 2 vessel or left main coronary artery disease) were significantly higher than in the control group with CAS alone (91% versus 68%, P = 0.008 and 76% versus 44%, P = 0.004, respectively). On the other hand, among study and control patients without CAS, although the frequencies of CAD and multivessel disease were higher in patients with MAC, interestingly, the differences were not statistically significant (37% versus 58% and 15% versus 26%, respectively, P > 0.05 for both). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that CAS (P < 0.001), MAC (P < 0.01) and, to a limited extent hypertension (P = 0.054), were independent predictors for the presence of CAD. In conclusion, the coexistence of CAS is more important in patients with MAC than in those without as it provides valuable information about the incidence and severity of underlying CAD. In cases with MAC but without CAS, MAC could be caused by factors other than atherosclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14717,"journal":{"name":"Japanese heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.45.603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

It has been suggested that mitral annular calcification (MAC) may be a manifestation of generalized atherosclerosis. However, how the incidence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) are affected by the coexistence of carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) in patients with versus without MAC have not yet been studied. We studied 101 patients with echocardiographic MAC and 52 controls without MAC to investigate the clinical impact of CAS on the frequency and severity (defined as the number of obstructed vessels) of CAD in patients with MAC. Carotid Doppler ultrasonographic examination was performed on all patients before coronary angiography. In patients with both MAC and CAS, the incidences of CAD and multivessel disease (> or = 2 vessel or left main coronary artery disease) were significantly higher than in the control group with CAS alone (91% versus 68%, P = 0.008 and 76% versus 44%, P = 0.004, respectively). On the other hand, among study and control patients without CAS, although the frequencies of CAD and multivessel disease were higher in patients with MAC, interestingly, the differences were not statistically significant (37% versus 58% and 15% versus 26%, respectively, P > 0.05 for both). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that CAS (P < 0.001), MAC (P < 0.01) and, to a limited extent hypertension (P = 0.054), were independent predictors for the presence of CAD. In conclusion, the coexistence of CAS is more important in patients with MAC than in those without as it provides valuable information about the incidence and severity of underlying CAD. In cases with MAC but without CAS, MAC could be caused by factors other than atherosclerosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有二尖瓣环钙化的患者颈动脉粥样硬化是否比没有二尖瓣环钙化的患者更重要?
有人认为二尖瓣环钙化(MAC)可能是全身性动脉粥样硬化的一种表现。然而,颈动脉粥样硬化(CAS)共存对MAC患者与非MAC患者冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的发生率和范围的影响尚没有研究。我们研究了101例超声心动图MAC患者和52例没有MAC的对照组,以研究CAS对MAC患者冠心病发生频率和严重程度(定义为阻塞血管的数量)的临床影响。所有患者在冠状动脉造影前都进行了颈动脉多普勒超声检查。在合并MAC和CAS的患者中,CAD和多支血管疾病(>或= 2支血管或左主干冠状动脉疾病)的发生率明显高于单独合并CAS的对照组(分别为91%对68%,P = 0.008和76%对44%,P = 0.004)。另一方面,在没有CAS的研究和对照患者中,虽然MAC患者的CAD和多血管疾病的频率更高,但有趣的是,差异无统计学意义(分别为37%对58%和15%对26%,P > 0.05)。逐步多元logistic回归分析显示,CAS (P < 0.001)、MAC (P < 0.01)和高血压(P = 0.054)是CAD存在的独立预测因子。总之,在MAC患者中,CAS的共存比没有MAC的患者更重要,因为它提供了有关潜在CAD发生率和严重程度的有价值的信息。在有MAC但没有CAS的病例中,MAC可能是由动脉粥样硬化以外的因素引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of intermittent with continuous simvastatin treatment in hypercholesterolemic patients with end stage renal failure. Effects of statins on circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The effects of atorvastatin treatment on the fibrinolytic system in dyslipidemic patients. Concentrations of hepatocyte growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor in pericardial fluid and plasma. Association between mitral annular calcification and stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1