Use of on-line evidence databases by Australian public health practitioners.

Armita Adily, Johanna Westbrook, Enrico Coiera, Jeanette Ward
{"title":"Use of on-line evidence databases by Australian public health practitioners.","authors":"Armita Adily,&nbsp;Johanna Westbrook,&nbsp;Enrico Coiera,&nbsp;Jeanette Ward","doi":"10.1080/14639230410001723437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate use of a web-based portal, known as the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), and evidence databases in an Australian population health workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-administered postal survey of 104 staff in a regional Division of Population Health in Sydney, Australia. The main outcome measures were CIAP use and organization support for CIAP use. Two thirds of the respondents agreed that using CIAP was a legitimate part of their practice. However, half agreed that staff were encouraged to use it. One in five respondents (21%) used CIAP weekly. CIAP use was significantly associated with medical qualification or, among non-medical staff, with having at least a Masters qualification. CIAP use was not associated with occupational category, gender, age, employment status nor years of experience. Use of specific evidence databases such as Cochrane also differed significantly by respondents' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been only partial uptake of on-line databases among this population health workforce, particularly according to attainment of relevant postgraduate qualifications. As CIAP is a resource for evidence-based practice, greater effort to increase its use is recommended to ensure population health does not fall behind hospital-based clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":80069,"journal":{"name":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","volume":"29 2","pages":"127-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14639230410001723437","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230410001723437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objective: To investigate use of a web-based portal, known as the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), and evidence databases in an Australian population health workforce.

Methods: Self-administered postal survey of 104 staff in a regional Division of Population Health in Sydney, Australia. The main outcome measures were CIAP use and organization support for CIAP use. Two thirds of the respondents agreed that using CIAP was a legitimate part of their practice. However, half agreed that staff were encouraged to use it. One in five respondents (21%) used CIAP weekly. CIAP use was significantly associated with medical qualification or, among non-medical staff, with having at least a Masters qualification. CIAP use was not associated with occupational category, gender, age, employment status nor years of experience. Use of specific evidence databases such as Cochrane also differed significantly by respondents' characteristics.

Conclusions: There has been only partial uptake of on-line databases among this population health workforce, particularly according to attainment of relevant postgraduate qualifications. As CIAP is a resource for evidence-based practice, greater effort to increase its use is recommended to ensure population health does not fall behind hospital-based clinicians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚公共卫生从业人员使用在线证据数据库。
目的:调查一个基于网络的门户网站,即临床信息访问计划(CIAP)和证据数据库在澳大利亚人口卫生工作人员中的使用情况。方法:对澳大利亚悉尼某地区人口卫生处104名工作人员进行邮政问卷调查。主要的结果测量是CIAP的使用和组织对CIAP使用的支持。三分之二的受访者同意使用CIAP是他们执业的合法部分。然而,一半的人同意鼓励员工使用它。五分之一的受访者(21%)每周使用CIAP。CIAP的使用与医疗资格显著相关,或者在非医疗人员中,与至少具有硕士资格相关。CIAP的使用与职业类别、性别、年龄、就业状况和经验年数无关。特定证据数据库(如Cochrane)的使用也因受访者的特征而有显著差异。结论:在这些人口卫生工作人员中,只有部分使用了在线数据库,特别是根据获得相关研究生资格的情况。由于CIAP是循证实践的资源,建议加大力度增加其使用,以确保人口健康不会落后于医院临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICT-based health information services for elderly people: past experiences, current trends, and future strategies. Readability and cultural sensitivity of web-based patient decision aids for cancer screening and treatment: a systematic review. Digital pens and pain diaries in palliative home health care: professional caregivers' experiences. Assisting the transition from hospital to home for children with major congenital heart disease by telemedicine: a feasibility study and initial results. Patients' perceptions of Internet usage and their opportunity to obtain health information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1