Diagnosis of hearing impairment: factors of delay.

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine B-Ent Pub Date : 2004-01-01
M N Serville, L Demanez, J P Demanez
{"title":"Diagnosis of hearing impairment: factors of delay.","authors":"M N Serville,&nbsp;L Demanez,&nbsp;J P Demanez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a retrospective study based on parents' personal interviews, the diagnosis circumstances were analysed in a group of 88 deaf children (moderate to profound deafness). We reported first the age when the parents emitted doubts, and second the age of diagnosis. It appeared that the age of first suspicions, and of diagnosis, was correlated to the degree of deafness. The population of children was divided in two groups depending on the presence of a delay or not in the diagnosis. The first group (24 children) was diagnosed early because of neonatal screening, or of early suspicions by parents or pediatrician. In the second group (64 children) were a delay was observed, seven causes were identified with variable frequency according to the level of deafness. The first four main causes for delayed diagnosis were: 1) parents, 2) medical refutation, 3) otitis media with effusion (OME), 4) progressive hearing loss. In conclusion, the age of diagnosis and the age of first suspicions were too late. Universal neonatal screening is recommended but do not appear to be the exclusive procedure to reduce the diagnostic's delay. This analysis of the factors of delay, prompted us to recommend: 1) information to parents on deafness, 2) careful attention to parents suspicions, 3) an objective evaluation of auditory function,especially after OME cure and 4) a follow-up of children to identify progressive hearing loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":55407,"journal":{"name":"B-Ent","volume":"58 1","pages":"53-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B-Ent","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a retrospective study based on parents' personal interviews, the diagnosis circumstances were analysed in a group of 88 deaf children (moderate to profound deafness). We reported first the age when the parents emitted doubts, and second the age of diagnosis. It appeared that the age of first suspicions, and of diagnosis, was correlated to the degree of deafness. The population of children was divided in two groups depending on the presence of a delay or not in the diagnosis. The first group (24 children) was diagnosed early because of neonatal screening, or of early suspicions by parents or pediatrician. In the second group (64 children) were a delay was observed, seven causes were identified with variable frequency according to the level of deafness. The first four main causes for delayed diagnosis were: 1) parents, 2) medical refutation, 3) otitis media with effusion (OME), 4) progressive hearing loss. In conclusion, the age of diagnosis and the age of first suspicions were too late. Universal neonatal screening is recommended but do not appear to be the exclusive procedure to reduce the diagnostic's delay. This analysis of the factors of delay, prompted us to recommend: 1) information to parents on deafness, 2) careful attention to parents suspicions, 3) an objective evaluation of auditory function,especially after OME cure and 4) a follow-up of children to identify progressive hearing loss.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力障碍的诊断:延迟因素。
回顾性分析了88例聋儿(中度至重度耳聋)的诊断情况。我们首先报道了父母提出怀疑的年龄,其次报道了诊断的年龄。第一次怀疑的年龄和诊断的年龄似乎与耳聋的程度有关。根据诊断是否存在延迟,将儿童人群分为两组。第一组(24名儿童)由于新生儿筛查或父母或儿科医生的早期怀疑而被早期诊断。在第二组(64名儿童)中,观察到延迟,根据耳聋程度确定了七种不同频率的原因。延迟诊断的前四个主要原因是:1)父母,2)医学反驳,3)中耳炎伴积液(OME), 4)进行性听力丧失。总之,诊断年龄和首次怀疑年龄都太晚了。普遍的新生儿筛查建议,但似乎不是唯一的程序,以减少诊断的延误。通过对延迟因素的分析,我们建议:1)向父母提供有关耳聋的信息;2)仔细关注父母的怀疑;3)客观评估听力功能,特别是OME治愈后;4)随访儿童以识别进行性听力损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
B-Ent
B-Ent 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Throughout its history, the Royal Belgian Society of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, the home society of B-ENT, aims to disseminate both the scientific and the clinical knowledge of otorhinolaryngology field primarily in Belgium and its regions. In accordance with this aim, publishing a scientific journal has become the number one objective of the Society. Accordingly, B-ENT contributes to the scientific memory of Belgium considering its deep-rooted history.
期刊最新文献
Application of Three-dimensional Reconstruction in the Pre-operative Diagnosis of Middle Ear Adenoma A Rare Case of Post-Intubation Subglottic Squamous Polyp with Discussion on the Multiple Etiologic Possibilities and Complications in an Infant Presenting with Stridor Restoring Hearing After Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma by Cochlear Nerve Preservation and Cochlear Implantation: Long-Term Follow-Up of Two Cases Intracochlear Auditory Nerve Monitoring and Cochlear Implantation After Total Resection of a Vestibular Schwannoma: Case Report A Case of Coexistence of an Arteriovenous Malformation and Hemangioma of the Maxillary Sinus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1