Is "ten days" really ten days?--the National Labor Relations Act's strike notice requirement in the healthcare industry.

Journal of health law Pub Date : 2004-01-01
G Roger King, Jeffrey D Winchester, E Michael Rossman
{"title":"Is \"ten days\" really ten days?--the National Labor Relations Act's strike notice requirement in the healthcare industry.","authors":"G Roger King,&nbsp;Jeffrey D Winchester,&nbsp;E Michael Rossman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nearly thirty years ago, Congress amended the National Labor Relations Act (Act) and provided employees of healthcare institutions with the right to strike and picket. At the same time, Congress added a new Section 8(g) requiring a labor organization to provide a healthcare institution with ten days' notice before engaging in various types of concerted activity--primarily strikes and picketing--against the institution. Thus, Section 8(g) is an important statute for healthcare employers. But since the time Congress added Section 8(g), the National Labor Relations Board has taken various views on Section 8(g) and whether \"ten days\" is really ten days. This Note explores the purposes of Section 8(g), as well as the reach and limits of its language, noting areas in which the board may wish to reconsider its application of the statute. Ultimately, the Note provides a checklist for healthcare employers to keep in mind with respect to Section 8(g).</p>","PeriodicalId":80027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nearly thirty years ago, Congress amended the National Labor Relations Act (Act) and provided employees of healthcare institutions with the right to strike and picket. At the same time, Congress added a new Section 8(g) requiring a labor organization to provide a healthcare institution with ten days' notice before engaging in various types of concerted activity--primarily strikes and picketing--against the institution. Thus, Section 8(g) is an important statute for healthcare employers. But since the time Congress added Section 8(g), the National Labor Relations Board has taken various views on Section 8(g) and whether "ten days" is really ten days. This Note explores the purposes of Section 8(g), as well as the reach and limits of its language, noting areas in which the board may wish to reconsider its application of the statute. Ultimately, the Note provides a checklist for healthcare employers to keep in mind with respect to Section 8(g).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“十天”真的是十天吗?——《国家劳动关系法》对医疗保健行业罢工通知的要求。
近30年前,国会修订了《国家劳动关系法》,赋予医疗机构雇员罢工和纠察的权利。与此同时,国会增加了新的第8(g)条,要求劳工组织在参与针对医疗机构的各种协同活动(主要是罢工和纠察)之前,向该机构提供十天的通知。因此,第8(g)条是医疗保健雇主的重要法规。但自从国会增加了第8(g)条以来,国家劳工关系委员会对第8(g)条以及“十天”是否真的是十天采取了各种看法。本说明探讨第8(g)条的目的及其用语的范围和限制,并指出执行局可能希望重新考虑其对规约的适用的领域。最后,该说明提供了一份清单,供医疗保健雇主牢记第8(g)条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Necessity of Establishing a ROK Armed Forces Institutional Review Board Ethical and Legal Issues on Human Brain Organoid Introduction of the National R&D Innovation Act and Research Ethics in Korea Examination of the Principle of Proportionality for the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Suggestions on Revision Regarding Abortion Laws in Korea: an Empirical Study Using Qualitative Research Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1