Focus on the beat: current fetal monitoring practice in low risk labour

Lucy Lewis (Research Midwife) , Jennifer Rowe (Lecturer)
{"title":"Focus on the beat: current fetal monitoring practice in low risk labour","authors":"Lucy Lewis (Research Midwife) ,&nbsp;Jennifer Rowe (Lecturer)","doi":"10.1016/S1448-8272(04)80029-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing fetal heart and thus fetal wellbeing during labour and childbith is an important if contentious, clinical practice. There is debate and concern about optimal methods of fetal monitoring during low risk childbirth. This paper reports on the findings of a qualitative study that investigated current midwives' practices. Data from focus groups conducted with midwives practising in Queensland was subject to a qualitative content analysis. While the ideal method of monitoring the fetal heart in low-risk labour is intermittent auscultation this analysis highlights not only the range of methods but also the rationales, contexts and factors motivating and influencing midwives' practice choices. In the current complex care environment midwives face a range of challenges to practice that facilitate the provision of consistent woman-centered care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100149,"journal":{"name":"Australian Midwifery","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1448-8272(04)80029-4","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1448827204800294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Assessing fetal heart and thus fetal wellbeing during labour and childbith is an important if contentious, clinical practice. There is debate and concern about optimal methods of fetal monitoring during low risk childbirth. This paper reports on the findings of a qualitative study that investigated current midwives' practices. Data from focus groups conducted with midwives practising in Queensland was subject to a qualitative content analysis. While the ideal method of monitoring the fetal heart in low-risk labour is intermittent auscultation this analysis highlights not only the range of methods but also the rationales, contexts and factors motivating and influencing midwives' practice choices. In the current complex care environment midwives face a range of challenges to practice that facilitate the provision of consistent woman-centered care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关注节拍:当前低风险分娩胎儿监测实践
评估胎儿心脏,从而在分娩和分娩期间胎儿的健康是一个重要的,如果有争议的,临床实践。关于低风险分娩期间胎儿监测的最佳方法存在争议和关注。本文报告了一项定性研究的结果,调查了目前助产士的做法。对昆士兰州执业助产士进行的焦点小组数据进行了定性内容分析。虽然在低风险分娩中监测胎儿心脏的理想方法是间歇性听诊,但这一分析不仅强调了方法的范围,而且还强调了激励和影响助产士实践选择的基本原理、背景和因素。在当前复杂的护理环境中,助产士面临着一系列的挑战,以促进提供一致的以妇女为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher degree abstracts ‘Multidisciplinary collaboration’ and ‘team work’: misnomers for subjugation? The emotional impact on mothers and midwives of conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics Australian college of midwifery journal to be reborn The experiences of a first cohort of Bachelor of Midwifery students, Victoria, Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1