Renal failure and ACE inhibition: how much is too much?

M-L Gross, M Adamczak, E Ritz
{"title":"Renal failure and ACE inhibition: how much is too much?","authors":"M-L Gross,&nbsp;M Adamczak,&nbsp;E Ritz","doi":"10.1007/s00392-005-0179-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dose-response relationship between pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and angiotensin II concentration in the circulation, on the one hand, and decrease of blood pressure, on the other hand, has been well established. In contrast it is currently unclear which dose of ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers is optimal for nephroprotection. Clinical studies are rendered quite complex by an early decrease of glomerular filtration after RAS blockade and by side effects at higher doses such as renal sodium loss, hyperkalemia, anemia, etc. Animal experiments and recent clinical studies suggest that the doses of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers required for maximal reduction of proteinuria (as a surrogate marker) and for optimal nephroprotection (retardation of the loss of glomerular filtration) exceed those required for maximal lowering of blood pressure. Ongoing studies try to define the relative merits of high dose monotherapy (ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) versus a combination therapy of the two.</p>","PeriodicalId":23757,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie","volume":"94 2","pages":"81-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00392-005-0179-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-005-0179-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The dose-response relationship between pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and angiotensin II concentration in the circulation, on the one hand, and decrease of blood pressure, on the other hand, has been well established. In contrast it is currently unclear which dose of ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers is optimal for nephroprotection. Clinical studies are rendered quite complex by an early decrease of glomerular filtration after RAS blockade and by side effects at higher doses such as renal sodium loss, hyperkalemia, anemia, etc. Animal experiments and recent clinical studies suggest that the doses of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers required for maximal reduction of proteinuria (as a surrogate marker) and for optimal nephroprotection (retardation of the loss of glomerular filtration) exceed those required for maximal lowering of blood pressure. Ongoing studies try to define the relative merits of high dose monotherapy (ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) versus a combination therapy of the two.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾功能衰竭和ACE抑制:多少是过量?
药物阻断肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)和循环中血管紧张素II浓度与降低血压之间的剂量-反应关系已经得到了很好的证实。相比之下,目前尚不清楚哪种剂量的ACE抑制剂和/或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对肾保护是最佳的。由于RAS阻断后早期肾小球滤过减少,以及高剂量的副作用,如肾钠流失、高钾血症、贫血等,临床研究变得相当复杂。动物实验和最近的临床研究表明,最大限度减少蛋白尿(作为替代标志物)和最佳肾保护(延缓肾小球滤过丧失)所需的ACE抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的剂量超过了最大限度降低血压所需的剂量。正在进行的研究试图确定高剂量单一治疗(ACE抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)与两者联合治疗的相对优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Pulmonary hypertension]. [History of atrial fibrillation]. Plasma levels of NT-pro-BNP in patients with atrial fibrillation before and after electrical cardioversion. Experience with INR self-management: patient selection and complication rates. Slow pathway ablation in children with documented reentrant supraventricular tachycardia not inducible during invasive electrophysiologic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1