Regression analysis utilizing subjective evaluation of emotional experience in PET studies on emotions

Sargo Aalto , Esa Wallius , Petri Näätänen , Jaana Hiltunen , Liisa Metsähonkala , Hannu Sipilä , Hasse Karlsson
{"title":"Regression analysis utilizing subjective evaluation of emotional experience in PET studies on emotions","authors":"Sargo Aalto ,&nbsp;Esa Wallius ,&nbsp;Petri Näätänen ,&nbsp;Jaana Hiltunen ,&nbsp;Liisa Metsähonkala ,&nbsp;Hannu Sipilä ,&nbsp;Hasse Karlsson","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresprot.2005.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A methodological study on subject-specific regression analysis (SSRA) exploring the correlation between the neural response and the subjective evaluation of emotional experience in eleven healthy females is presented. The target emotions, i.e., amusement and sadness, were induced using validated film clips, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured using positron emission tomography (PET), and the subjective intensity of the emotional experience during the PET scanning was measured using a category ratio (CR-10) scale. Reliability analysis of the rating data indicated that the subjects rated the intensity of their emotional experience fairly consistently on the CR-10 scale (Cronbach alphas 0.70–0.97). A two-phase random-effects analysis was performed to ensure the generalizability and inter-study comparability of the SSRA results. Random-effects SSRAs using Statistical non-Parametric Mapping 99 (SnPM99) showed that rCBF correlated with the self-rated intensity of the emotional experience mainly in the brain regions that were identified in the random-effects subtraction analyses using the same imaging data. Our results give preliminary evidence of a linear association between the neural responses related to amusement and sadness and the self-evaluated intensity of the emotional experience in several regions involved in the emotional response. SSRA utilizing subjective evaluation of emotional experience turned out a feasible and promising method of analysis. It allows versatile exploration of the neurobiology of emotions and the neural correlates of actual and individual emotional experience. Thus, SSRA might be able to catch the idiosyncratic aspects of the emotional response better than traditional subtraction analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79477,"journal":{"name":"Brain research. Brain research protocols","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 142-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brainresprot.2005.06.003","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain research. Brain research protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385299X05000644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

A methodological study on subject-specific regression analysis (SSRA) exploring the correlation between the neural response and the subjective evaluation of emotional experience in eleven healthy females is presented. The target emotions, i.e., amusement and sadness, were induced using validated film clips, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured using positron emission tomography (PET), and the subjective intensity of the emotional experience during the PET scanning was measured using a category ratio (CR-10) scale. Reliability analysis of the rating data indicated that the subjects rated the intensity of their emotional experience fairly consistently on the CR-10 scale (Cronbach alphas 0.70–0.97). A two-phase random-effects analysis was performed to ensure the generalizability and inter-study comparability of the SSRA results. Random-effects SSRAs using Statistical non-Parametric Mapping 99 (SnPM99) showed that rCBF correlated with the self-rated intensity of the emotional experience mainly in the brain regions that were identified in the random-effects subtraction analyses using the same imaging data. Our results give preliminary evidence of a linear association between the neural responses related to amusement and sadness and the self-evaluated intensity of the emotional experience in several regions involved in the emotional response. SSRA utilizing subjective evaluation of emotional experience turned out a feasible and promising method of analysis. It allows versatile exploration of the neurobiology of emotions and the neural correlates of actual and individual emotional experience. Thus, SSRA might be able to catch the idiosyncratic aspects of the emotional response better than traditional subtraction analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用情绪体验主观评价的PET情绪研究回归分析
本文采用被试回归分析(SSRA)对11名健康女性的情绪体验主观评价与神经反应的关系进行了方法学研究。通过验证的电影片段诱导目标情绪,即娱乐和悲伤,使用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量区域脑血流量(rCBF),并使用类别比量表(CR-10)测量PET扫描期间情绪体验的主观强度。评价数据的信度分析表明,被试对情绪体验强度的评价在CR-10量表上基本一致(Cronbach alpha值为0.70-0.97)。为了确保SSRA结果的普遍性和研究间的可比性,进行了两期随机效应分析。使用统计非参数映射99 (SnPM99)的随机效应SSRAs显示rCBF与情绪体验的自评强度相关,主要在使用相同成像数据的随机效应减法分析中确定的大脑区域。我们的研究结果初步证明了与娱乐和悲伤相关的神经反应与情绪反应相关的几个区域的情绪体验的自我评估强度之间存在线性关联。利用主观情绪体验评价的SSRA分析方法是一种可行的、有前景的分析方法。它允许对情感的神经生物学以及实际和个人情感体验的神经相关性进行多方面的探索。因此,SSRA可能比传统的减法分析更能捕捉到情绪反应的特殊方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Index Selective capture of endothelial and perivascular cells from brain microvessels using laser capture microdissection Real-time visualization and characterization of liposomal delivery into the monkey brain by magnetic resonance imaging Episodic-like memory in mice: Simultaneous assessment of object, place and temporal order memory The isolated perfused bovine retina—A sensitive tool for pharmacological research on retinal function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1