A clinician's review of the WHI-related literature.

Leon Speroff
{"title":"A clinician's review of the WHI-related literature.","authors":"Leon Speroff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When the monitoring board of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) canceled the estrogen-progestin arm of the study in July 2002, the effect was immediate and dramatic, as several million postmenopausal women with the full agreement of their physicians ceased taking combined hormone therapy. Soon thereafter the manufacturers of conjugated equine estrogens felt compelled to publicize a drastic restriction of the indications for their product. Little notice, except in the medical literature, was given to the continuation of the other treatment arms of the WHI, nor did the rather small (however significant) increases in risk of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer resulting from combined therapy receive widespread serious analysis. In this article, special attention is given to the population sampling involved in setting up the WHI, arm by arm, with full discussion of how these samplings compare with those in other studies--HERS, ERA, WEST, etc. All studies are scrutinized in terms of treatment regimens, follow-up, confounding factors, particularly statins and aspirin, and high drop-out rates in order to discover possible reasons for the results in the WHI for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the combined-therapy arm and slightly disappointing results for breast cancer. Each of the two main sections of the article, Cardiovascular Disease and Breast Cancer, concludes with a detailed summation of points derived from the often contrasting results of the various studies, which can be used in counseling patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility and Womens Medicine","volume":"49 6","pages":"252-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility and Womens Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When the monitoring board of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) canceled the estrogen-progestin arm of the study in July 2002, the effect was immediate and dramatic, as several million postmenopausal women with the full agreement of their physicians ceased taking combined hormone therapy. Soon thereafter the manufacturers of conjugated equine estrogens felt compelled to publicize a drastic restriction of the indications for their product. Little notice, except in the medical literature, was given to the continuation of the other treatment arms of the WHI, nor did the rather small (however significant) increases in risk of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer resulting from combined therapy receive widespread serious analysis. In this article, special attention is given to the population sampling involved in setting up the WHI, arm by arm, with full discussion of how these samplings compare with those in other studies--HERS, ERA, WEST, etc. All studies are scrutinized in terms of treatment regimens, follow-up, confounding factors, particularly statins and aspirin, and high drop-out rates in order to discover possible reasons for the results in the WHI for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the combined-therapy arm and slightly disappointing results for breast cancer. Each of the two main sections of the article, Cardiovascular Disease and Breast Cancer, concludes with a detailed summation of points derived from the often contrasting results of the various studies, which can be used in counseling patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医师对whi相关文献的回顾。
2002年7月,当妇女健康倡议(WHI)监督委员会取消了该研究的雌激素-黄体酮部分时,其效果立竿竿头,效果显著,因为数百万绝经后妇女在医生的完全同意下停止了联合激素治疗。此后不久,马结合雌激素的制造商感到有必要宣传其产品的适应症的严格限制。除了医学文献外,很少有人注意到WHI的其他治疗组的延续,也没有对联合治疗导致的心血管疾病和乳腺癌风险的相当小(然而显著)的增加进行广泛认真的分析。在本文中,特别关注了建立WHI所涉及的人口抽样,并充分讨论了这些抽样与其他研究(HERS, ERA, WEST等)的比较。所有研究都在治疗方案、随访、混杂因素(特别是他汀类药物和阿司匹林)和高退出率方面进行仔细审查,以便发现WHI在联合治疗组中心血管疾病一级和二级预防结果和乳腺癌结果略令人失望的可能原因。这篇文章的两个主要部分,心血管疾病和乳腺癌,每个部分都有一个详细的总结,这些总结来自不同研究的经常对比的结果,可以用于咨询患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The paradox of obstetric "near misses": converting maternal mortality into morbidity. Climacteric symptom control after the addition of low-dose esterified conjugated estrogens to raloxifene standard doses. Update on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: part 2--clinical signs and treatment. Influence of adiposity on leptin, LH and androgen levels in lean, overweight and obese PCOS patients. Value of fetal echocardiography in diagnosis of congenital heart disease in a Serbian university hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1