New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.

Acta orthopaedica. Supplementum Pub Date : 2005-02-01
Georgios Digas
{"title":"New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.","authors":"Georgios Digas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the outcome of different types of polyethylene, bone cements and one design of uncemented fixation with porous and ceramic coating using radiostereometry, bone densitometry, conventional radiography and clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Study I: 201 patients were extracted from 5 prospective randomised studies to evaluate femoral head penetration at two years with radiostereometry in four basic designs, cemented Lubinus and Reflection cups, uncemented Trilogy and Reflection cups. Studies II and III: 60 patients (61 hips) were randomised to receive either highly cross-linked or conventional all PE cups. 32 patients with bilateral arthrosis received hybrid THA with highly cross-linked PE on one side and conventional on the contra lateral side. Femoral head penetration and the migration of the cups were evaluated with radiostereometry in the supine and standing positions. DEXA and conventional radiography were used to evaluate the bone mineral density and radiolucencies around the cemented acetabular component. Studies IV and V: 90 patients (97 and 96 hips respectively) were stratified depended on age, gender, diagnosis and preoperative BMD to create 3 main groups of socket fixation. In the first group fluoride containing cement was used, in the second group Palacos cum Gentamicin and in the third hybrid THA with porous coated HA/TCP cup. In the hybrid group the fixation of the femoral component was again randomised to either of the two cements. The results on femoral and acetabular sides are presented separately in studies IV and V, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study I: Cups with polyethylene sterilized in EtO had almost twice the proximal and 3D penetration rates compared with gamma-sterilized polyethylene. Regression analysis showed that the type of sterilization, age and weight was the most important factors affecting the penetration rate. Studies II and III: In the cemented study the proximal penetration was lower in the study group independent of position at 3 years, while in the hybrid study the penetration was lower in the study group only in the supine position at 2 years. The migration of the cup did not differ between the plastics in both studies. At 2 years the periprosthetic radiolucency and BMD did not differ significantly between the 2 types of PE used in the cemented study. Study IV: The subsidence of the stem did not differ between the groups, but the periprosthetic BMD decreased more in fluoride cement group at 2 years. Conventional radiography revealed higher progression of radiolucent lines in the Palacos group, but only in one region. Study V: The proximal migration of the cup was almost similar in all three groups. The three dimensional migration was increased in patients with osteoporosis. Postoperative radiolucent lines tended to disappear with use of porous coating covered with HA/TCP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study I: EtO sterilized polyethylene increased the femoral head penetration. Age and weight were also important predictors of the penetration rate. Studies II and III: The highly cross-linked polyethylene decreased the penetration rate mainly after one year probably reflecting less wear. The different mechanical properties of the two types of PE studied did not affect the early fixation of the cemented cup. Study IV: There were no obvious advantage of addition of fluoride to acrylic bone cement when used to fixate the femoral component. Study V: Use of fluoride containing cement or uncemented fixation did not improve the early stability of the socket compared to Palacos with Gentamicin.</p>","PeriodicalId":87168,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica. Supplementum","volume":"76 315","pages":"3-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the outcome of different types of polyethylene, bone cements and one design of uncemented fixation with porous and ceramic coating using radiostereometry, bone densitometry, conventional radiography and clinical parameters.

Materials and methods: Study I: 201 patients were extracted from 5 prospective randomised studies to evaluate femoral head penetration at two years with radiostereometry in four basic designs, cemented Lubinus and Reflection cups, uncemented Trilogy and Reflection cups. Studies II and III: 60 patients (61 hips) were randomised to receive either highly cross-linked or conventional all PE cups. 32 patients with bilateral arthrosis received hybrid THA with highly cross-linked PE on one side and conventional on the contra lateral side. Femoral head penetration and the migration of the cups were evaluated with radiostereometry in the supine and standing positions. DEXA and conventional radiography were used to evaluate the bone mineral density and radiolucencies around the cemented acetabular component. Studies IV and V: 90 patients (97 and 96 hips respectively) were stratified depended on age, gender, diagnosis and preoperative BMD to create 3 main groups of socket fixation. In the first group fluoride containing cement was used, in the second group Palacos cum Gentamicin and in the third hybrid THA with porous coated HA/TCP cup. In the hybrid group the fixation of the femoral component was again randomised to either of the two cements. The results on femoral and acetabular sides are presented separately in studies IV and V, respectively.

Results: Study I: Cups with polyethylene sterilized in EtO had almost twice the proximal and 3D penetration rates compared with gamma-sterilized polyethylene. Regression analysis showed that the type of sterilization, age and weight was the most important factors affecting the penetration rate. Studies II and III: In the cemented study the proximal penetration was lower in the study group independent of position at 3 years, while in the hybrid study the penetration was lower in the study group only in the supine position at 2 years. The migration of the cup did not differ between the plastics in both studies. At 2 years the periprosthetic radiolucency and BMD did not differ significantly between the 2 types of PE used in the cemented study. Study IV: The subsidence of the stem did not differ between the groups, but the periprosthetic BMD decreased more in fluoride cement group at 2 years. Conventional radiography revealed higher progression of radiolucent lines in the Palacos group, but only in one region. Study V: The proximal migration of the cup was almost similar in all three groups. The three dimensional migration was increased in patients with osteoporosis. Postoperative radiolucent lines tended to disappear with use of porous coating covered with HA/TCP.

Conclusions: Study I: EtO sterilized polyethylene increased the femoral head penetration. Age and weight were also important predictors of the penetration rate. Studies II and III: The highly cross-linked polyethylene decreased the penetration rate mainly after one year probably reflecting less wear. The different mechanical properties of the two types of PE studied did not affect the early fixation of the cemented cup. Study IV: There were no obvious advantage of addition of fluoride to acrylic bone cement when used to fixate the femoral component. Study V: Use of fluoride containing cement or uncemented fixation did not improve the early stability of the socket compared to Palacos with Gentamicin.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型高分子材料在全髋关节置换术中的应用。用放射立体测量、骨密度测量、x线摄影和临床参数评价。
目的:通过放射立体测量、骨密度测量、常规x线摄影和临床参数评价不同类型聚乙烯骨水泥和多孔陶瓷涂层非骨水泥固定的效果。材料和方法:研究I:从5项前瞻性随机研究中提取201例患者,在4种基本设计(Lubinus和反射杯,未胶合的Trilogy和反射杯)中评估股骨头穿透2年时的放射立体测量。研究II和III: 60例患者(61髋)随机接受高交联或传统的全PE杯。32例双侧关节患者接受了单侧高交联PE和对侧常规PE的混合THA。采用仰卧位和站立位放射立体测量法评估股骨头穿透和股骨头杯的移动情况。使用DEXA和常规x线摄影评估骨水泥臼假体周围的骨矿物质密度和放射性。研究IV和V:根据年龄、性别、诊断和术前骨密度对90例患者(分别为97和96髋)进行分层,形成3个主要的窝内固定组。第一组使用含氟水泥,第二组使用Palacos和庆大霉素,第三组使用多孔包被HA/TCP杯的混合THA。在混合组中,股骨假体的固定再次随机分配到两种水泥中的任何一种。股骨侧和髋臼侧的结果分别在研究IV和V中报道。结果:研究一:EtO灭菌聚乙烯杯的近端和三维穿透率几乎是γ灭菌聚乙烯杯的两倍。回归分析表明,灭菌类型、年龄和体重是影响普及率的最重要因素。研究II和III:在骨水泥研究中,研究组在3年时近端穿透较低,与体位无关,而在混合研究中,研究组在2年时仅在仰卧位下穿透较低。在两项研究中,杯子的移动在塑料之间没有区别。2年后,在骨水泥研究中使用的两种PE之间,假体周围的放射性透光率和骨密度没有显著差异。研究四:两组间假体的下陷没有差异,但2年时氟化水泥组假体周围骨密度下降更多。常规放射照相显示Palacos组放射透光线进展较高,但仅在一个区域。研究五:在三组中,杯的近端移动几乎相似。骨质疏松患者的三维偏移量增加。使用HA/TCP覆盖的多孔涂层后,术后放射线线趋于消失。结论:研究一:EtO灭菌聚乙烯增加股骨头穿透。年龄和体重也是渗透率的重要预测因子。研究II和III:高交联聚乙烯主要在一年后降低了穿透率,可能反映了磨损较少。所研究的两种PE的不同力学性能对骨水泥杯的早期固定没有影响。研究四:在丙烯酸骨水泥中加入氟化物固定股骨假体没有明显的优势。研究五:与Palacos使用庆大霉素相比,使用含氟骨水泥或非骨水泥固定并不能改善早期窝的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Internal fixation of fragility fractures of the femoral neck. The young osteoarthritic hip: Clinical outcome of total hip arthroplasty and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiostereometric analysis of sacroiliac joint movement and outcomes of pelvic joint fusion. Complications in ankle fracture surgery. Determinants of outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1