Reliable manual segmentation of the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes on magnetic resonance images of healthy subjects

Arun L.W. Bokde , Stefan J. Teipel , Robert Schwarz , Gerda Leinsinger , Katharina Buerger , Tobias Moeller , Hans-Juergen Möller , Harald Hampel
{"title":"Reliable manual segmentation of the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes on magnetic resonance images of healthy subjects","authors":"Arun L.W. Bokde ,&nbsp;Stefan J. Teipel ,&nbsp;Robert Schwarz ,&nbsp;Gerda Leinsinger ,&nbsp;Katharina Buerger ,&nbsp;Tobias Moeller ,&nbsp;Hans-Juergen Möller ,&nbsp;Harald Hampel","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresprot.2004.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background</em>: It is a challenge to reliably measure the lobar volumes from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.</p><p><em>Objective</em>: Description of a landmark-based method for volumetric segmentation of the brain into the four cerebral lobes from MR images.</p><p><em>Method</em>: The segmentation method relies on a combination of anatomical landmarks and geometrical definitions. The first step, described previously, is a segmentation of the four lobes on the surface of the brain. The internal borders between the lobes are defined on the axial slices of the brain. The intra- and inter- rater reliability was determined from the MRI scans of a group of 10 healthy control subjects measured by 2 independent raters.</p><p><em>Results</em>: The intra-rater relative error (and intra-class correlation coefficient) of the lobar volume measures ranged from 0.81% to 3.85% (from 0.97 to 0.99). The inter-rater relative error (and intra-class correlation coefficient) ranged from 0.55% to 3.09% (from 0.94 to 0.99).</p><p><em>Conclusion</em>: This technique has been shown to have high intra- and inter-rater reliability. The current method provides a method to obtain volumetric estimates of the 4 cerebral lobes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79477,"journal":{"name":"Brain research. Brain research protocols","volume":"14 3","pages":"Pages 135-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brainresprot.2004.10.001","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain research. Brain research protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385299X0400090X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Background: It is a challenge to reliably measure the lobar volumes from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.

Objective: Description of a landmark-based method for volumetric segmentation of the brain into the four cerebral lobes from MR images.

Method: The segmentation method relies on a combination of anatomical landmarks and geometrical definitions. The first step, described previously, is a segmentation of the four lobes on the surface of the brain. The internal borders between the lobes are defined on the axial slices of the brain. The intra- and inter- rater reliability was determined from the MRI scans of a group of 10 healthy control subjects measured by 2 independent raters.

Results: The intra-rater relative error (and intra-class correlation coefficient) of the lobar volume measures ranged from 0.81% to 3.85% (from 0.97 to 0.99). The inter-rater relative error (and intra-class correlation coefficient) ranged from 0.55% to 3.09% (from 0.94 to 0.99).

Conclusion: This technique has been shown to have high intra- and inter-rater reliability. The current method provides a method to obtain volumetric estimates of the 4 cerebral lobes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对健康受试者的磁共振图像进行额叶、顶叶、颞叶和枕叶的可靠人工分割
背景:从磁共振成像(MRI)数据中可靠地测量脑叶体积是一个挑战。目的:描述一种基于地标的脑容量分割方法。方法:基于解剖标志和几何定义相结合的分割方法。第一步,如前所述,是对大脑表面的四个脑叶进行分割。脑叶之间的内部边界在脑轴向切片上明确。评估者内部和评估者之间的信度是由两名独立评估者对10名健康对照者的MRI扫描确定的。结果:脑叶容积测量的分级内相对误差(及分级内相关系数)范围为0.81% ~ 3.85%(0.97 ~ 0.99)。等级间相对误差(和等级内相关系数)范围为0.55% ~ 3.09%(0.94 ~ 0.99)。结论:该技术已被证明具有较高的内部和内部可靠性。目前的方法提供了一种获得4脑叶体积估计的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Index Selective capture of endothelial and perivascular cells from brain microvessels using laser capture microdissection Real-time visualization and characterization of liposomal delivery into the monkey brain by magnetic resonance imaging Episodic-like memory in mice: Simultaneous assessment of object, place and temporal order memory The isolated perfused bovine retina—A sensitive tool for pharmacological research on retinal function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1