[Cardiovascular medicine in the German diagnosis-related group--(G-DRG) system 2005].

T Fürstenberg, H Bunzemeier, N Roeder, H Reinecke
{"title":"[Cardiovascular medicine in the German diagnosis-related group--(G-DRG) system 2005].","authors":"T Fürstenberg,&nbsp;H Bunzemeier,&nbsp;N Roeder,&nbsp;H Reinecke","doi":"10.1007/s00392-005-0234-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The German diagnosis-related Group (G-DRG) System has recently been published in its third version. From 2005 on, this system will be the definite measure for the budgets of nearly all german hospitals. The preliminary phase with no budget reduction or redistribution being made and in which an inappropriate classification system had no negative impact on reimbursement has, thus, come to an end. At present, many hospitals are struggling in an economic competition about the independence or maintenance of the hospital or several sub-departments. The changes in the classification system with regard to a marked increase in the number of G DRGs, a modified grouping-logic, more properly determined reductions and extra charges for low and high outlier as well as the introduction of further additional charges contribute thereby to a better covering of services and treatments of cardiovascular patients. However, while many of the known problems have been eliminated, there are still weaknesses in the G-DRG System even concerning cardiovascular medicine. The G-DRG System has to be adapted continuously with consultation of the clinical expertise of the respective medical societies. The most important new aspects and changes in the G-DRG System 2005 and the accompanied execution regulations are explained with special view on cardiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23757,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie","volume":"94 5","pages":"360-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00392-005-0234-1","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-005-0234-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The German diagnosis-related Group (G-DRG) System has recently been published in its third version. From 2005 on, this system will be the definite measure for the budgets of nearly all german hospitals. The preliminary phase with no budget reduction or redistribution being made and in which an inappropriate classification system had no negative impact on reimbursement has, thus, come to an end. At present, many hospitals are struggling in an economic competition about the independence or maintenance of the hospital or several sub-departments. The changes in the classification system with regard to a marked increase in the number of G DRGs, a modified grouping-logic, more properly determined reductions and extra charges for low and high outlier as well as the introduction of further additional charges contribute thereby to a better covering of services and treatments of cardiovascular patients. However, while many of the known problems have been eliminated, there are still weaknesses in the G-DRG System even concerning cardiovascular medicine. The G-DRG System has to be adapted continuously with consultation of the clinical expertise of the respective medical societies. The most important new aspects and changes in the G-DRG System 2005 and the accompanied execution regulations are explained with special view on cardiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[心血管医学在德国诊断相关组-(G-DRG)系统2005]。
德国诊断相关组(G-DRG)系统最近出版了第三版。从2005年起,这一制度将成为几乎所有德国医院预算的明确衡量标准。因此,没有削减预算或重新分配预算以及不适当的叙级制度对偿还款项没有不利影响的初步阶段已经结束。目前,许多医院在医院或几个分科的独立性或维护性的经济竞争中挣扎。分类系统的变化涉及到G drg数量的显著增加,改进的分组逻辑,更适当地确定低和高异常值的减少和额外收费,以及引入进一步的额外收费,从而有助于更好地覆盖心血管患者的服务和治疗。然而,虽然许多已知问题已经消除,但G-DRG系统甚至在心血管医学方面仍然存在弱点。G-DRG系统必须与各自医学协会的临床专业知识进行协商,不断进行调整。从心脏病学的角度阐述了2005年G-DRG制度及其实施细则中最重要的新方面和变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Pulmonary hypertension]. [History of atrial fibrillation]. Plasma levels of NT-pro-BNP in patients with atrial fibrillation before and after electrical cardioversion. Experience with INR self-management: patient selection and complication rates. Slow pathway ablation in children with documented reentrant supraventricular tachycardia not inducible during invasive electrophysiologic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1