Development of a rat model to assess the efficacy of the somatosensory-evoked potential as indicator of analgesia

H. van Oostrom , P.J. Stienen , R. van den Bos , H.N.M. de Groot , L.J. Hellebrekers
{"title":"Development of a rat model to assess the efficacy of the somatosensory-evoked potential as indicator of analgesia","authors":"H. van Oostrom ,&nbsp;P.J. Stienen ,&nbsp;R. van den Bos ,&nbsp;H.N.M. de Groot ,&nbsp;L.J. Hellebrekers","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresprot.2005.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drug-induced changes in somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) are considered to reflect an altered nociceptive state. Therefore, the SEP is proposed to be a parameter of analgesic efficacy. However, at present, SEPs have not been studied in relation to animal pain. The present study aims to develop a rat model in which this relationship can be studied based on Pavlovian fear conditioning. Therefore, rats, implanted with epidural electro-encephalogram recording electrodes, were randomly assigned to either a paired or random-control group and subjected to an aversive-to-appetitive transfer paradigm. During the aversive phase, the SEP-stimulation paradigm (5 mA square wave pulses, <em>n</em> = 72, of 2 ms duration each, with a stimulus frequency of 0.5 Hz; total duration 144 s) was used as the unconditioned stimulus (US), while a tone (40 s, 1500 Hz, 85 dB sound pressure level) was used as the conditioned stimulus (CS). During the appetitive phase, the CS was presented paired to the presentation of a sugar pellet. When compared to the random-control group, the paired group showed significantly more freezing behavior and significantly less reward-directed behavior in response to the CS in the appetitive phase. In addition, SEPs were not significantly affected by fear conditioning. Based on these results, we conclude that the SEP-stimulation paradigm can be successfully employed as a US in fear conditioning. In future studies, fear conditioning can be carried out under different levels of an analgesic regimen to allow the changes in SEP parameters to be compared to changes in fear-induced behavior making this model potentially useful to validate SEP parameters as indicators of analgesia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79477,"journal":{"name":"Brain research. Brain research protocols","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brainresprot.2005.02.001","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain research. Brain research protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385299X05000139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Drug-induced changes in somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) are considered to reflect an altered nociceptive state. Therefore, the SEP is proposed to be a parameter of analgesic efficacy. However, at present, SEPs have not been studied in relation to animal pain. The present study aims to develop a rat model in which this relationship can be studied based on Pavlovian fear conditioning. Therefore, rats, implanted with epidural electro-encephalogram recording electrodes, were randomly assigned to either a paired or random-control group and subjected to an aversive-to-appetitive transfer paradigm. During the aversive phase, the SEP-stimulation paradigm (5 mA square wave pulses, n = 72, of 2 ms duration each, with a stimulus frequency of 0.5 Hz; total duration 144 s) was used as the unconditioned stimulus (US), while a tone (40 s, 1500 Hz, 85 dB sound pressure level) was used as the conditioned stimulus (CS). During the appetitive phase, the CS was presented paired to the presentation of a sugar pellet. When compared to the random-control group, the paired group showed significantly more freezing behavior and significantly less reward-directed behavior in response to the CS in the appetitive phase. In addition, SEPs were not significantly affected by fear conditioning. Based on these results, we conclude that the SEP-stimulation paradigm can be successfully employed as a US in fear conditioning. In future studies, fear conditioning can be carried out under different levels of an analgesic regimen to allow the changes in SEP parameters to be compared to changes in fear-induced behavior making this model potentially useful to validate SEP parameters as indicators of analgesia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立大鼠模型以评估躯体感觉诱发电位作为镇痛指标的有效性
药物引起的体感诱发电位(SEPs)的变化被认为反映了伤害状态的改变。因此,建议将SEP作为镇痛效果的一个参数。然而,目前还没有研究sep与动物疼痛的关系。本研究旨在建立一个基于巴甫洛夫恐惧条件反射的大鼠模型来研究这种关系。因此,植入硬膜外脑电图记录电极的大鼠被随机分配到配对组或随机对照组,并接受厌恶到食欲的转移范式。在厌恶阶段,sep刺激范式(5 mA方波脉冲,n = 72,每个2 ms持续时间,刺激频率为0.5 Hz;以总持续时间144 s作为非条件刺激(US),以声音(40 s, 1500 Hz, 85 dB声压级)作为条件刺激(CS)。在食欲阶段,CS与糖粒配对呈现。与随机对照组相比,配对组在食欲期对CS的反应中表现出更多的冻结行为和更少的奖励导向行为。此外,恐惧条件反射对sep无显著影响。基于这些结果,我们得出结论,sep刺激范式可以成功地作为恐惧条件反射的US。在未来的研究中,可以在不同水平的镇痛方案下进行恐惧条件反射,以便将SEP参数的变化与恐惧诱发行为的变化进行比较,使该模型可能有助于验证SEP参数作为镇痛指标的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Index Selective capture of endothelial and perivascular cells from brain microvessels using laser capture microdissection Real-time visualization and characterization of liposomal delivery into the monkey brain by magnetic resonance imaging Episodic-like memory in mice: Simultaneous assessment of object, place and temporal order memory The isolated perfused bovine retina—A sensitive tool for pharmacological research on retinal function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1