As-needed inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in moderate-to-severe asthma: current recommendations.

Donald W Cockcroft
{"title":"As-needed inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in moderate-to-severe asthma: current recommendations.","authors":"Donald W Cockcroft","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200504030-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intermediate-acting inhaled beta2-agonists (e.g. albuterol [salbutamol]), once recommended for round-the-clock bronchodilation, are now recommended to be used exclusively as-needed. Guidelines advise that asthma should be controlled with anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies so that the as-needed requirement for inhaled beta2-agonists should be infrequent; ideally less than several times per week, up to once a day for exercise, and none at night. These recommendations are based upon the recognition that asthma is primarily an inflammatory condition and that the major thrust of therapy should be anti-inflammatory, including environmental control and administration of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), leukotriene-receptor antagonists, and possibly oral theophylline and inhaled cromones; the cromones include cromolyn sodium (sodium cromogylcate) and nedocromil. While this is the primary rationale behind the as-needed infrequent prescription of the inhaled beta2-agonist paradigm, there are a number of detrimental effects that can be seen with regularly scheduled (or frequent as-needed) use of inhaled beta2-agonists. These include tolerance to the bronchodilator and particularly the bronchoprotective effects, increased airway responsiveness to allergen, worsened asthma control, and, probably most importantly, over-reliance on an excellent symptom reliever leading to undertreatment. Any or all of these could be responsible for the demonstrated dose-response relationship between inhaled beta2-agonist overuse and death from asthma. Several controlled clinical trials, which have included many patients with at least moderately severe asthma, have failed to demonstrate any obvious advantage to the regular scheduled use of inhaled beta2-agonists compared with as-needed inhaled beta2-agonists. On the other hand, despite no obvious advantage, regular use of albuterol 1000-1200 microg/day appears to be well tolerated and reasonably safe. When asthma is treated using an as-needed, infrequent inhaled beta2-agonist, the requirements for beta2-agonists become a useful marker of whether or not the asthma is adequately controlled. When inhaled beta2-agonists are required inordinately frequently (i.e. when asthma is not adequately controlled), after ensuring compliance with ICS, the most common strategy is to add one of the long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists twice daily. On the basis of the available evidence, the as-needed intermediate-acting inhaled beta2-agonist therapeutic strategy appears appropriate for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"4 3","pages":"169-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200504030-00002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200504030-00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Intermediate-acting inhaled beta2-agonists (e.g. albuterol [salbutamol]), once recommended for round-the-clock bronchodilation, are now recommended to be used exclusively as-needed. Guidelines advise that asthma should be controlled with anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies so that the as-needed requirement for inhaled beta2-agonists should be infrequent; ideally less than several times per week, up to once a day for exercise, and none at night. These recommendations are based upon the recognition that asthma is primarily an inflammatory condition and that the major thrust of therapy should be anti-inflammatory, including environmental control and administration of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), leukotriene-receptor antagonists, and possibly oral theophylline and inhaled cromones; the cromones include cromolyn sodium (sodium cromogylcate) and nedocromil. While this is the primary rationale behind the as-needed infrequent prescription of the inhaled beta2-agonist paradigm, there are a number of detrimental effects that can be seen with regularly scheduled (or frequent as-needed) use of inhaled beta2-agonists. These include tolerance to the bronchodilator and particularly the bronchoprotective effects, increased airway responsiveness to allergen, worsened asthma control, and, probably most importantly, over-reliance on an excellent symptom reliever leading to undertreatment. Any or all of these could be responsible for the demonstrated dose-response relationship between inhaled beta2-agonist overuse and death from asthma. Several controlled clinical trials, which have included many patients with at least moderately severe asthma, have failed to demonstrate any obvious advantage to the regular scheduled use of inhaled beta2-agonists compared with as-needed inhaled beta2-agonists. On the other hand, despite no obvious advantage, regular use of albuterol 1000-1200 microg/day appears to be well tolerated and reasonably safe. When asthma is treated using an as-needed, infrequent inhaled beta2-agonist, the requirements for beta2-agonists become a useful marker of whether or not the asthma is adequately controlled. When inhaled beta2-agonists are required inordinately frequently (i.e. when asthma is not adequately controlled), after ensuring compliance with ICS, the most common strategy is to add one of the long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists twice daily. On the basis of the available evidence, the as-needed intermediate-acting inhaled beta2-agonist therapeutic strategy appears appropriate for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据需要吸入β -肾上腺素能受体激动剂治疗中重度哮喘:目前的建议。
曾经推荐用于24小时支气管扩张的中效吸入β -受体激动剂(如沙丁胺醇[沙丁胺醇]),现在只推荐根据需要使用。指南建议,哮喘应通过抗炎治疗策略加以控制,因此吸入β 2激动剂的需求应不频繁;理想情况下,每周不超过几次,每天锻炼一次,晚上不要锻炼。这些建议是基于这样一种认识,即哮喘主要是一种炎症性疾病,治疗的主要重点应该是抗炎,包括环境控制和吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)、白三烯受体拮抗剂的施用,以及可能的口服茶碱和吸入激素;这些激素包括色莫利钠(色莫利酸钠)和奈多克罗米。虽然这是按需不频繁使用吸入β -受体激动剂的主要理由,但定期(或按需频繁)使用吸入β -受体激动剂会产生许多有害影响。这些包括对支气管扩张剂的耐受性,特别是对支气管的保护作用,气道对过敏原的反应性增加,哮喘控制恶化,可能最重要的是,过度依赖一种优秀的症状缓解剂导致治疗不足。这些因素中的任何一个或全部都可能导致过量使用吸入β 2激动剂与哮喘死亡之间的剂量-反应关系。几项对照临床试验,包括许多至少患有中度哮喘的患者,未能证明常规使用吸入β -受体激动剂与按需吸入β -受体激动剂相比有任何明显的优势。另一方面,尽管没有明显的优势,定期使用沙丁胺醇1000-1200微克/天似乎是耐受性良好和相当安全的。当根据需要使用不经常吸入的β 2激动剂治疗哮喘时,β 2激动剂的需要量成为哮喘是否得到充分控制的有用标志。当吸入β -受体激动剂需要异常频繁时(即当哮喘没有得到充分控制时),在确保符合ICS后,最常见的策略是每天两次添加一种长效吸入β -受体激动剂。根据现有证据,按需使用中间作用吸入β 2激动剂治疗策略似乎适用于中重度哮喘患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Nosocomial pneumonia : rationalizing the approach to empirical therapy. Managing asthma in expectant mothers. New strategies for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease : the rationale for arginine therapy. Antioxidant strategies in respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1