Socio-economic health differences among the elderly population in Krakow, Poland.

Tomasz Knurowski, Jitse P van Dijk, Andrea Madarasova Geckova, Piotr Brzyski, Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk, Wim J A van den Heuvel
{"title":"Socio-economic health differences among the elderly population in Krakow, Poland.","authors":"Tomasz Knurowski,&nbsp;Jitse P van Dijk,&nbsp;Andrea Madarasova Geckova,&nbsp;Piotr Brzyski,&nbsp;Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk,&nbsp;Wim J A van den Heuvel","doi":"10.1007/s00038-005-2051-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether socio-economic health differences persist into old age in Poland and if there are SES-related differences in health by age group and gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>528 randomly chosen, not institutionalized elderly people aged 65-85 living in Krakow were interviewed about their socio-economic status (occupation, education, income, house ownership), health status (self-rated health) and quality of life (Cantril's ladder).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with higher level of education and higher occupational status reported significantly better health and better quality of life compared to people who were not as well off. Income level and house ownership had a significant influence on the quality of life of elderly people. In addition, some findings indicate differences in the patterning of health inequalities across particular age and gender groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are socio-economic differences in health and quality of life among the urban elderly population in Poland which are unfavourable for lower social strata.</p>","PeriodicalId":21877,"journal":{"name":"Sozial- und Praventivmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00038-005-2051-8","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sozial- und Praventivmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-005-2051-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether socio-economic health differences persist into old age in Poland and if there are SES-related differences in health by age group and gender.

Methods: 528 randomly chosen, not institutionalized elderly people aged 65-85 living in Krakow were interviewed about their socio-economic status (occupation, education, income, house ownership), health status (self-rated health) and quality of life (Cantril's ladder).

Results: People with higher level of education and higher occupational status reported significantly better health and better quality of life compared to people who were not as well off. Income level and house ownership had a significant influence on the quality of life of elderly people. In addition, some findings indicate differences in the patterning of health inequalities across particular age and gender groups.

Conclusion: There are socio-economic differences in health and quality of life among the urban elderly population in Poland which are unfavourable for lower social strata.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰克拉科夫老年人口的社会经济健康差异
目的:评估波兰的社会经济健康差异是否持续到老年,以及按年龄组和性别是否存在与ses相关的健康差异。方法:随机选取528名居住在克拉科夫的65-85岁非机构老年人,对其社会经济状况(职业、教育、收入、房屋所有权)、健康状况(自评健康)和生活质量(Cantril’s ladder)进行访谈。结果:受教育程度高、职业地位高的人报告的健康状况和生活质量明显优于不那么富裕的人。收入水平和住房拥有量对老年人生活质量有显著影响。此外,一些调查结果表明,在特定年龄和性别群体之间,健康不平等的模式存在差异。结论:波兰城市老年人口在健康和生活质量方面存在社会经济差异,这对社会下层不利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Argemone mexicana L. Phytoaromathérapie de l’herpès Melaleuca alternifolia Le carapa, un arbre dont on ne peut ignorer les bienfaits (Guyane française) D’où vient la phytothérapie et vers où tend-elle ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1