Outbreak of influenza A (H3N2) in a highly-vaccinated religious community: a retrospective cohort study.

S Nicholls, K Carroll, J Crofts, E Ben-Eliezer, J Paul, M Zambon, C A Joseph, N Q Verlander, N L Goddard, J M Watson
{"title":"Outbreak of influenza A (H3N2) in a highly-vaccinated religious community: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"S Nicholls,&nbsp;K Carroll,&nbsp;J Crofts,&nbsp;E Ben-Eliezer,&nbsp;J Paul,&nbsp;M Zambon,&nbsp;C A Joseph,&nbsp;N Q Verlander,&nbsp;N L Goddard,&nbsp;J M Watson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An outbreak of influenza occurred at the end of the 2001-2 winter season in a highly-vaccinated, semi-enclosed, religious community. On the basis of retrospective self reporting, 43% met the case definition (151/350) and 81% (25/31) of throat swabs from cases were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) -positive for influenza A (H3N2). The risk of developing influenza in people aged 65 or more was lower than that of children aged 2 years and under (odds ratio 0.1, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.38). The risk of developing symptoms of influenza was not significantly different between people who had been vaccinated in the United Kingdom and those who had not been vaccinated (OR 1.14, CI 0.41 to 3.14). Chronic disease was an independent risk factor for developing symptoms of influenza (OR 1.9, CI 1 to 3.63). Timing of the outbreak, the age structure and mode of communal living may have influenced the efficacy of the influenza vaccine, which was well matched to circulating strains at the time of the outbreak. It is important to consider the diagnosis of influenza even in a highly-vaccinated community.</p>","PeriodicalId":72640,"journal":{"name":"Communicable disease and public health","volume":"7 4","pages":"272-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable disease and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An outbreak of influenza occurred at the end of the 2001-2 winter season in a highly-vaccinated, semi-enclosed, religious community. On the basis of retrospective self reporting, 43% met the case definition (151/350) and 81% (25/31) of throat swabs from cases were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) -positive for influenza A (H3N2). The risk of developing influenza in people aged 65 or more was lower than that of children aged 2 years and under (odds ratio 0.1, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.38). The risk of developing symptoms of influenza was not significantly different between people who had been vaccinated in the United Kingdom and those who had not been vaccinated (OR 1.14, CI 0.41 to 3.14). Chronic disease was an independent risk factor for developing symptoms of influenza (OR 1.9, CI 1 to 3.63). Timing of the outbreak, the age structure and mode of communal living may have influenced the efficacy of the influenza vaccine, which was well matched to circulating strains at the time of the outbreak. It is important to consider the diagnosis of influenza even in a highly-vaccinated community.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在高度接种疫苗的宗教社区爆发甲型流感(H3N2):一项回顾性队列研究。
2001- 2002年冬季结束时,在一个高度接种疫苗的半封闭宗教社区爆发了流感。在回顾性自我报告的基础上,43%的病例符合病例定义(151/350),81%(25/31)的病例咽拭子对甲型流感(H3N2)聚合酶链反应(PCR)阳性。65岁及以上人群患流感的风险低于2岁及以下儿童(优势比为0.1,95%可信区间为0.02至0.38)。在英国接种疫苗的人和未接种疫苗的人出现流感症状的风险没有显著差异(OR 1.14, CI 0.41至3.14)。慢性疾病是出现流感症状的独立危险因素(OR 1.9, CI 1 ~ 3.63)。疫情爆发的时间、年龄结构和社区生活模式可能影响了流感疫苗的效力,该疫苗与疫情爆发时流行的菌株非常匹配。即使在高度接种疫苗的社区,也要考虑流感的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What should we measure: infection or infection control? Accountability for health protection in England: how this has been affected by the establishment of the Health Protection Agency. Evaluation of peer review of infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in four acute care trusts in the East of England. Surveillance of antenatal infections--HIV, hepatitis B, syphilis and rubella susceptibility in London. How complete and accurate is meningococcal disease notification?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1