[Transcatheter arterial embolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: does selective treatment improve outcome?].

Fumikiyo Ganaha, Ken Koyama, Shunichi Sadaoka, Tetsuhisa Yamada, Chihiro Kanehira, Kunihiko Fukuda
{"title":"[Transcatheter arterial embolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: does selective treatment improve outcome?].","authors":"Fumikiyo Ganaha,&nbsp;Ken Koyama,&nbsp;Shunichi Sadaoka,&nbsp;Tetsuhisa Yamada,&nbsp;Chihiro Kanehira,&nbsp;Kunihiko Fukuda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether selective transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) contributes to preservation of liver function and improves local control and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent single or multiple TAE were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of deterioration of liver function caused by TAE was compared between patients with Child class A disease and those having Child B/C disease. The correlation between extent of embolization and incidence of deterioration of liver function was analyzed. In addition, factors affecting deterioration of liver function after TAE were determined. Recurrence-free and overall survival rate were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze prognostic factors affecting recurrence-free and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of deterioration of liver function in the Child B/C group (47%) was significantly higher than that in the Child A group (21%). Pretreatment Child-Pugh classification and extent of embolization were significant factors in the deterioration of liver function after TAE. Recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 38%, 19%, and 8%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 89%, 59%, 22%, and 22%, respectively. Findings of multivariate analyses of prognostic factors showed that tumor size and selectivity of TAE were significant for recurrence-free survival and the initial Child-Pugh classification was the most important factor for overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selective TAE improves local control and avoids damage to nontumorous liver tissue. The selective technique appears to be associated with a favorable outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":19251,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica","volume":"65 3","pages":"240-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether selective transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) contributes to preservation of liver function and improves local control and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Materials and methods: One hundred patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent single or multiple TAE were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of deterioration of liver function caused by TAE was compared between patients with Child class A disease and those having Child B/C disease. The correlation between extent of embolization and incidence of deterioration of liver function was analyzed. In addition, factors affecting deterioration of liver function after TAE were determined. Recurrence-free and overall survival rate were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze prognostic factors affecting recurrence-free and overall survival.

Results: The incidence of deterioration of liver function in the Child B/C group (47%) was significantly higher than that in the Child A group (21%). Pretreatment Child-Pugh classification and extent of embolization were significant factors in the deterioration of liver function after TAE. Recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 38%, 19%, and 8%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 89%, 59%, 22%, and 22%, respectively. Findings of multivariate analyses of prognostic factors showed that tumor size and selectivity of TAE were significant for recurrence-free survival and the initial Child-Pugh classification was the most important factor for overall survival.

Conclusion: Selective TAE improves local control and avoids damage to nontumorous liver tissue. The selective technique appears to be associated with a favorable outcome.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管动脉栓塞治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌:选择性治疗能改善预后吗?
目的:评价选择性经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE)是否有助于保存肝细胞癌患者的肝功能,改善局部控制和生存率。材料与方法:回顾性分析100例肝细胞癌行单次或多次TAE的患者。比较Child A类疾病与Child B/C类疾病患者TAE所致肝功能恶化的发生率。分析栓塞程度与肝功能恶化发生率的相关性。此外,确定TAE后影响肝功能恶化的因素。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算无复发生存率和总生存率。采用Cox比例风险模型分析影响无复发和总生存期的预后因素。结果:患儿B/C组肝功能恶化发生率(47%)明显高于患儿A组(21%)。Child-Pugh分级及栓塞程度是影响TAE术后肝功能恶化的重要因素。1年、2年和3年无复发生存率分别为38%、19%和8%。1年、3年、5年和7年的总生存率分别为89%、59%、22%和22%。预后因素的多因素分析结果显示,肿瘤大小和TAE的选择性对无复发生存具有重要意义,而初始Child-Pugh分类是影响总生存的最重要因素。结论:选择性TAE改善了局部控制,避免了对非肿瘤肝组织的损害。选择性技术似乎与良好的结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Abstracts of the 45th Autumn Meeting of the Japanese Radiological Society. October 29-31, 2009. Wakayama, Japan]. [Abstracts of the 68th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Radiological Society. April 16-19, 2009. Yokohama, Japan]. [The 44th Autumn Meeting of the Japanese Radiological Society. Fukushima, Japan. October 22-24, 2008. Abstracts]. [The 67th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Radiological Society. Yokohama, Japan. April 4-6, 2008. Abstracts]. [The 43rd autumn meeting of the Japan Radiological Society. Nagoya, Japan. October 25-27, 2007. Abstracts].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1