Next generation leadership: a profile of self-rated competencies among administrative resident and fellows.

Brad Helfand, Emily Cherlin, Elizabeth H Bradley
{"title":"Next generation leadership: a profile of self-rated competencies among administrative resident and fellows.","authors":"Brad Helfand,&nbsp;Emily Cherlin,&nbsp;Elizabeth H Bradley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare executives and program faculty have voiced concerns that early careerists lack needed competencies for future leadership in the increasingly complex healthcare industry. However, empirical studies of early careerists' competency levels are limited. We sought to describe administrative fellows' and residents' (n = 78, response rate 73.6%) self-rated competency in several key areas and assess how these ratings differed by individuals' gender, age, prior work experience, year of graduate training, and type of degree program. Respondents rated their competence particularly high (41.7% of respondents rated themselves \"A\") in the domain of interpersonal and emotional intelligence, which included being an effective team leader and member, coaching and developing others, self-awareness, and self-regulation. Lower ratings were in the domains of facilities management and in development and fundraising. Compared to males, females rated their competency in the financial skills domain lower (P-value = 0.04). Age, prior work experience, year of graduate training, and type of degree program were not significantly associated with self-rated competency in any area. These results provide early evidence that may help program faculty and preceptors consider pedagogical approaches that reflect students' vocalized needs and may help to design strategies that effectively cultivate next generation leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":75078,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of health administration education","volume":"22 1","pages":"85-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of health administration education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare executives and program faculty have voiced concerns that early careerists lack needed competencies for future leadership in the increasingly complex healthcare industry. However, empirical studies of early careerists' competency levels are limited. We sought to describe administrative fellows' and residents' (n = 78, response rate 73.6%) self-rated competency in several key areas and assess how these ratings differed by individuals' gender, age, prior work experience, year of graduate training, and type of degree program. Respondents rated their competence particularly high (41.7% of respondents rated themselves "A") in the domain of interpersonal and emotional intelligence, which included being an effective team leader and member, coaching and developing others, self-awareness, and self-regulation. Lower ratings were in the domains of facilities management and in development and fundraising. Compared to males, females rated their competency in the financial skills domain lower (P-value = 0.04). Age, prior work experience, year of graduate training, and type of degree program were not significantly associated with self-rated competency in any area. These results provide early evidence that may help program faculty and preceptors consider pedagogical approaches that reflect students' vocalized needs and may help to design strategies that effectively cultivate next generation leadership.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下一代领导力:行政住院医师和研究员自我评估能力的概况。
医疗保健管理人员和项目教师表示担心,在日益复杂的医疗保健行业,早期的野心家缺乏未来领导所需的能力。然而,对早期野心家能力水平的实证研究有限。我们试图描述行政研究员和住院医师(n = 78,回答率73.6%)在几个关键领域的自我评价能力,并评估这些评价如何因个人的性别、年龄、先前的工作经验、研究生培训年份和学位课程类型而不同。受访者对自己在人际关系和情商方面的能力评价特别高(41.7%的受访者认为自己是“A”),其中包括成为一个有效的团队领导者和成员,指导和发展他人,自我意识和自我调节。较低的评级是在设施管理、开发和筹资领域。与男性相比,女性对财务技能领域的能力评价较低(p值= 0.04)。年龄、以前的工作经验、毕业培训年份和学位课程类型与任何领域的自评能力都没有显著相关。这些结果提供了早期证据,可以帮助项目教师和导师考虑反映学生发声需求的教学方法,并可能有助于设计有效培养下一代领导力的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work-life balance among health administration faculty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Student perceptions of a teaching electronic medical record in Health Administration education. Faculty salaries in health administration: trends and correlates 2015-2021. Supporting Health System Transformation: The development of an integrated interprofessional curriculum inclusive of public health students. WORKPLACE INCIVILITY EXPERIENCED BY HEALTH ADMINISTRATION FACULTY.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1