Splinting strategies and controversies.

Reg Richard, R Scott Ward
{"title":"Splinting strategies and controversies.","authors":"Reg Richard,&nbsp;R Scott Ward","doi":"10.1097/01.bcr.0000176886.63559.8b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Splinting is a common burn care intervention strategy based on logical anatomic and biomechanical principles. The persistence of scar contraction requires countermeasures, frequently splints, and most clinicians would concur that splints are valuable in opposing these contraction forces. Clinical decisions about splinting are often made on respected opinion, leading mainly to design and application options. Variables that affect splinting strategy include the risk-to-benefit ratio of the splint, the timing of the application, the choice of splint design, and duration of the splinting intervention. The most common of these variables reported in the literature is simply unique designs for splints. Although there are different splint designs for similar problems, no data exist to favor one design over another. Controversy about splinting in burn care is not based on the rationale for and success of splinting but exists because of the paucity of validation of its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22626,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","volume":"26 5","pages":"392-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.bcr.0000176886.63559.8b","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bcr.0000176886.63559.8b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

Splinting is a common burn care intervention strategy based on logical anatomic and biomechanical principles. The persistence of scar contraction requires countermeasures, frequently splints, and most clinicians would concur that splints are valuable in opposing these contraction forces. Clinical decisions about splinting are often made on respected opinion, leading mainly to design and application options. Variables that affect splinting strategy include the risk-to-benefit ratio of the splint, the timing of the application, the choice of splint design, and duration of the splinting intervention. The most common of these variables reported in the literature is simply unique designs for splints. Although there are different splint designs for similar problems, no data exist to favor one design over another. Controversy about splinting in burn care is not based on the rationale for and success of splinting but exists because of the paucity of validation of its use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夹板策略与争议。
夹板是一种基于逻辑解剖学和生物力学原理的常见烧伤护理干预策略。疤痕持续收缩需要对策,通常是夹板,大多数临床医生都会同意夹板在对抗这些收缩力方面是有价值的。关于夹板的临床决定通常是在尊重意见的基础上做出的,主要是设计和应用的选择。影响夹板策略的变量包括夹板的风险-效益比、夹板应用的时机、夹板设计的选择以及夹板干预的持续时间。这些变量中最常见的文献报道是简单的独特设计的夹板。虽然有不同的夹板设计类似的问题,没有数据存在,有利于一个设计比另一个。关于夹板在烧伤护理中的争议不是基于夹板的原理和成功,而是由于缺乏对其使用的验证而存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Americans With Disabilities Act. Celebrating progress in psychosocial rehabilitation: empirically validating the efficacy of social skills training and body image assessment for burn survivors. Efficacy of a short-term, intensive social skills training program for burned adolescents. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistance: comparison of findings in a burn intensive care unit, other intensive care units, and the hospital services unit of a single center. Ginkgo biloba extract improves oxidative organ damage in a rat model of thermal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1