Suicidal continuum (ideation, planning, attempting) in an Islamic country; which should be focused on?

Journal of injury & violence research Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-30 DOI:10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1556
Mohamad Khajedaluee, Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan, Lida Jarahi, Hoda Khatibi-Moghadam, Afsaneh Faridpak
{"title":"Suicidal continuum (ideation, planning, attempting) in an Islamic country; which should be focused on?","authors":"Mohamad Khajedaluee,&nbsp;Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan,&nbsp;Lida Jarahi,&nbsp;Hoda Khatibi-Moghadam,&nbsp;Afsaneh Faridpak","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of suicidal ideation (SI), suicidal plan (SP), and suicide attempt (SA) in patients who had survived suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a one-year cross-sectional design in Khorasan Razavi province, all suicide attempters who were referred to urban and rural health care centers, hospital's emergency rooms and agreed to participate in the study were included. The previous twelve-month SI, SP and lifelong SA (prior to the current suicide attempt) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of 856 included individuals was 24.2±8.3 years. The majority (652,76.4%) were females. Half of them were first-time suicide attempters. The mean age of first SI was 22±7.7; SP 22±7.9; and SA 22.2±8 years. The twelve-month prevalence of SI and SP prior to the current suicide attempt was 30% and 26.7%, respectively. Males, unlettered, wedded, and employees were significantly older at their first time SI, SP, and SA (all p less than 0.001). SI (25,44.6%), SP(25,47.2%) and SA(34,75.6%) were more prevalent in widow/divorced individuals(all p-values less than 0.02). SI (OR=53.4,CI95%=33.6-85) increased the risk of SP, and SP(OR=6.7,CI95%=4.5-9.9) increased the risk of SA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SI seems to be a more important predictor of suicide compared to SP, however, the fact that a significant number of attempters had not any previous detectable suicidal ideation or plan, indicates particular clinical considerations. We need to have some presuppositions about the factors leading to unplanned and unthoughtful suicide attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":" ","pages":"47-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142339/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of suicidal ideation (SI), suicidal plan (SP), and suicide attempt (SA) in patients who had survived suicide attempts.

Methods: In a one-year cross-sectional design in Khorasan Razavi province, all suicide attempters who were referred to urban and rural health care centers, hospital's emergency rooms and agreed to participate in the study were included. The previous twelve-month SI, SP and lifelong SA (prior to the current suicide attempt) were obtained.

Results: The mean age of 856 included individuals was 24.2±8.3 years. The majority (652,76.4%) were females. Half of them were first-time suicide attempters. The mean age of first SI was 22±7.7; SP 22±7.9; and SA 22.2±8 years. The twelve-month prevalence of SI and SP prior to the current suicide attempt was 30% and 26.7%, respectively. Males, unlettered, wedded, and employees were significantly older at their first time SI, SP, and SA (all p less than 0.001). SI (25,44.6%), SP(25,47.2%) and SA(34,75.6%) were more prevalent in widow/divorced individuals(all p-values less than 0.02). SI (OR=53.4,CI95%=33.6-85) increased the risk of SP, and SP(OR=6.7,CI95%=4.5-9.9) increased the risk of SA.

Conclusions: SI seems to be a more important predictor of suicide compared to SP, however, the fact that a significant number of attempters had not any previous detectable suicidal ideation or plan, indicates particular clinical considerations. We need to have some presuppositions about the factors leading to unplanned and unthoughtful suicide attempts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰国家的连续自杀(构思、计划、企图);应该关注哪些方面?
背景:本研究的目的是确定自杀未遂患者的自杀意念(SI)、自杀计划(SP)和自杀企图(SA)的特征。方法:在呼罗珊拉扎维省进行为期一年的横断面设计,包括所有被转介到城市和农村卫生保健中心、医院急诊室并同意参与研究的自杀未遂者。获得过去12个月的SI、SP和终生SA(在当前自杀企图之前)。结果:856例入组患者平均年龄24.2±8.3岁。女性占多数(652例,占76.4%)。其中一半是第一次自杀未遂。首次SI的平均年龄为22±7.7岁;SP 22±7.9;SA为22.2±8岁。自杀未遂前12个月的SI和SP患病率分别为30%和26.7%。男性、未婚者、已婚者和雇员在首次SI、SP和SA时明显年龄较大(p均小于0.001)。SI(25,44.6%)、SP(25,47.2%)和SA(34,75.6%)在寡妇/离婚人群中更为普遍(p值均小于0.02)。SI (OR=53.4,CI95%=33.6 ~ 85)增加SP的风险,SP(OR=6.7,CI95%=4.5 ~ 9.9)增加SA的风险。结论:与SP相比,SI似乎是一个更重要的自杀预测因素,然而,相当多的企图者之前没有任何可检测到的自杀意念或计划,这一事实表明了特殊的临床考虑。我们需要对导致意外和不经思考的自杀企图的因素有一些预设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety symptoms in female victims of domestic violence. The magnitude of parental physical harms: a descriptive report of 76 abusive children in Isfahan. Deaths and clashes induced by rivalry among fans during FIFA World Cup 2022 in Bangladesh. Factors affecting the spiritual rehabilitation of people affected by natural disasters: a systematic review. US States with poor social health outcomes and more firearms have more morbidity due to mass shootings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1