Therapeutic reactance in adolescents: the psychometrics of the Therapeutic Reactance Scale in adolescents.

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology Pub Date : 2019-05-30 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.21307/sjcapp-2019-003
Richard A Inman, Ana Margarida Sousa, Diana Cunha, Paulo Moreira
{"title":"Therapeutic reactance in adolescents: the psychometrics of the Therapeutic Reactance Scale in adolescents.","authors":"Richard A Inman, Ana Margarida Sousa, Diana Cunha, Paulo Moreira","doi":"10.21307/sjcapp-2019-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Therapeutic Reactance Scale (TRS) is a classic measure of psychological reactance, yet only two studies have evaluated its factorial structure. Both proposed different multidimensional structures based on exploratory analyses. Not only is the factorial structure of the TRS unclear, but the scale has yet to be validated in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to test the factorial structure of the TRS in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and analyses of reliability and validity, with a sample of 1,344 adolescents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A four-factor model fits well to the data. Three of the four TRS dimensions (not susceptibility to influence, SI) were correlated with the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS). These three dimensions were also correlated with novelty seeking, cooperativeness and persistence components of personality (Cloninger's psychobiological model of personality), while SI showed a different pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, this study demonstrates that the TRS is a suitable and potentially useful tool for measuring reactance in adolescents, but the authors propose that practitioners may wish to consider excluding items pertaining to the SI dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/a4/sjcapp-07-003.PMC7709934.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2019-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Therapeutic Reactance Scale (TRS) is a classic measure of psychological reactance, yet only two studies have evaluated its factorial structure. Both proposed different multidimensional structures based on exploratory analyses. Not only is the factorial structure of the TRS unclear, but the scale has yet to be validated in adolescents.

Objective: This study aimed to test the factorial structure of the TRS in adolescents.

Methods: The authors conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and analyses of reliability and validity, with a sample of 1,344 adolescents.

Results: A four-factor model fits well to the data. Three of the four TRS dimensions (not susceptibility to influence, SI) were correlated with the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS). These three dimensions were also correlated with novelty seeking, cooperativeness and persistence components of personality (Cloninger's psychobiological model of personality), while SI showed a different pattern.

Conclusions: Overall, this study demonstrates that the TRS is a suitable and potentially useful tool for measuring reactance in adolescents, but the authors propose that practitioners may wish to consider excluding items pertaining to the SI dimension.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年的治疗反应:青少年治疗反应量表的心理测量学。
背景:治疗反应量表(TRS)是测量心理反应的经典量表,但只有两项研究对其因子结构进行了评估。这两项研究都在探索性分析的基础上提出了不同的多维结构。TRS的因子结构不仅不明确,而且该量表尚未在青少年中得到验证:本研究旨在测试青少年 TRS 的因子结构:作者对 1344 名青少年样本进行了探索性和确认性因子分析,以及信度和效度分析:结果:四因素模型与数据非常吻合。在 TRS 的四个维度中,有三个维度(非易受影响性,SI)与洪氏心理反应量表(HPRS)相关。这三个维度也与人格中的求新、合作和坚持部分(克罗宁格的人格心理生物学模型)相关,而 SI 则显示出不同的模式:总之,本研究表明,TRS 是测量青少年反应性的合适且可能有用的工具,但作者建议从业人员不妨考虑排除与 SI 维度相关的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Normative reference interval for youths on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Long-Term Outcomes of Adolescent Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Problems: Exploring the Co-occurrence of Mental Health and Substance Use Problems. The Spanish version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0): Psychometric evaluation in adolescents who have suffered from parental abuse and neglect and a community sample. Adaptation and Feasibility of KONTAKT™ Social Skills Toolbox Group Program for Australian Autistic Children. Sensory white noise in clinical ADHD: Who benefits from noise, and who performs worse?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1