Effort-Related Decision-Making in ADHD.

Journal of psychiatry and brain science Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-25 DOI:10.20900/jpbs.20200027
Suzanne H Mitchell, Deborah Sevigny-Resetco
{"title":"Effort-Related Decision-Making in ADHD.","authors":"Suzanne H Mitchell,&nbsp;Deborah Sevigny-Resetco","doi":"10.20900/jpbs.20200027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ADHD is defined by behavioral symptoms that are not well characterized in relation to ADHD's neurobiological mechanisms. This approach has limited our ability to define ADHD nosology and predict outcomes because it does not systematically examine facets of the disorder such as the inability to maintain cognitively effortful activities, as promoted in the NIMH RDoC approach. Existing data indicate ADHD is associated with differences in reward valuation and processing, but we do not know whether ADHD is also associated with higher levels of aversion to exerting cognitive effort and/or altered reward x effort interactions. Our ongoing study addresses this knowledge gap by examining individuals' preferences between rewards associated with minimal effort and reward alternatives with a higher payoff but higher effort costs (\"effort discounting\"); thereby permitting us to characterize differences in biases and tradeoffs during effort-related decision-making in ADHD. The study takes advantage of a well-defined sample of ADHD-diagnosed and healthy control individuals to address three aims. First, we determine whether ADHD is associated with steeper discounting of larger, more effortful rewards. Second, we examine the subjective perception of effort in youth diagnosed with ADHD and healthy controls using tasks requiring varying levels of cognitive effort. Third, we explore relationships amongst indices of effort discounting, theoretically-related traits (e.g., grit, distress tolerance), biomarkers of effort-related decision-making (eye movements and pupil size), and various cognitive measures. Successful completion of the aims will permit us to better characterize ADHD-healthy control differences and lay a foundation for more computational approaches to ADHD diagnostic criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":73912,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatry and brain science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842264/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatry and brain science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/jpbs.20200027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ADHD is defined by behavioral symptoms that are not well characterized in relation to ADHD's neurobiological mechanisms. This approach has limited our ability to define ADHD nosology and predict outcomes because it does not systematically examine facets of the disorder such as the inability to maintain cognitively effortful activities, as promoted in the NIMH RDoC approach. Existing data indicate ADHD is associated with differences in reward valuation and processing, but we do not know whether ADHD is also associated with higher levels of aversion to exerting cognitive effort and/or altered reward x effort interactions. Our ongoing study addresses this knowledge gap by examining individuals' preferences between rewards associated with minimal effort and reward alternatives with a higher payoff but higher effort costs ("effort discounting"); thereby permitting us to characterize differences in biases and tradeoffs during effort-related decision-making in ADHD. The study takes advantage of a well-defined sample of ADHD-diagnosed and healthy control individuals to address three aims. First, we determine whether ADHD is associated with steeper discounting of larger, more effortful rewards. Second, we examine the subjective perception of effort in youth diagnosed with ADHD and healthy controls using tasks requiring varying levels of cognitive effort. Third, we explore relationships amongst indices of effort discounting, theoretically-related traits (e.g., grit, distress tolerance), biomarkers of effort-related decision-making (eye movements and pupil size), and various cognitive measures. Successful completion of the aims will permit us to better characterize ADHD-healthy control differences and lay a foundation for more computational approaches to ADHD diagnostic criteria.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ADHD患者的努力相关决策。
ADHD是由行为症状来定义的,这些症状并没有很好地描述ADHD的神经生物学机制。这种方法限制了我们定义ADHD病种和预测结果的能力,因为它没有系统地检查这种疾病的各个方面,如无法维持认知努力活动,正如NIMH RDoC方法所提倡的那样。现有数据表明,ADHD与奖励评估和处理的差异有关,但我们不知道ADHD是否也与更高水平的厌恶施加认知努力和/或改变的奖励-努力相互作用有关。我们正在进行的研究通过检查个人在与最小努力相关的奖励和具有更高回报但更高努力成本的奖励替代方案(“努力折扣”)之间的偏好来解决这一知识差距;从而使我们能够描述ADHD患者在努力相关决策过程中的偏见和权衡的差异。该研究利用了一个定义明确的adhd诊断样本和健康对照个体,以实现三个目标。首先,我们确定ADHD是否与更大、更努力的奖励的大幅折扣有关。其次,我们通过需要不同程度认知努力的任务来检验被诊断为ADHD的青少年和健康对照者对努力的主观感知。第三,我们探讨了努力折扣指数、理论相关特征(如毅力、痛苦耐受力)、努力相关决策的生物标志物(眼动和瞳孔大小)以及各种认知测量之间的关系。成功完成这些目标将使我们能够更好地描述ADHD与健康控制的差异,并为更多的ADHD诊断标准的计算方法奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sleep Disturbance Mediates the Relationship between Problematic Technology Use and Psychotic-Like Experiences: A Large Cross-Sectional Study in 87,302 Chinese Adolescents A Focused Review of Gamma Neuromodulation as a Therapeutic Target in Alzheimer's Spectrum Disorders. Closing the Digital Divide in Interventions for Substance Use Disorder. Disparities in Utilization and Delivery Outcomes for Women with Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders. Understanding Suicide over the Life Course Using Data Science Tools within a Triangulation Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1