Comparing the cost, glycaemic control and medication adherence of utilizing patients' own medicines (POMs) versus usual dispensing among diabetic patients in an outpatient setting.

Phei Ching Lim, Yin Ying Chung, Shien Joo Tan, Te Ying Wong, Durga Devi Permalu, Thean Kheng Cheah, Shueh Lin Lim, Chong Yew Lee
{"title":"Comparing the cost, glycaemic control and medication adherence of utilizing patients' own medicines (POMs) versus usual dispensing among diabetic patients in an outpatient setting.","authors":"Phei Ching Lim,&nbsp;Yin Ying Chung,&nbsp;Shien Joo Tan,&nbsp;Te Ying Wong,&nbsp;Durga Devi Permalu,&nbsp;Thean Kheng Cheah,&nbsp;Shueh Lin Lim,&nbsp;Chong Yew Lee","doi":"10.1007/s40199-021-00389-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Millions worth of unused drugs particularly those indicated for chronic diseases such as diabetes were returned and disposed leading to substantial wastage. Use of patients' own medications (POMs) in the inpatient setting has reduced wastage and saved cost. The impact of utilizing POMs in the outpatient setting has hitherto not been determined.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the cost, medication adherence and glycaemic control of utilizing POMs versus usual dispensing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective randomized controlled study was conducted among diabetic patients that required monthly medication refill in the Outpatient Pharmacy in 2017. Patients who consented were equally divided into POMs and control groups. Both groups brought excess medications from home at week-0 and week-12. Patients in the POMs group brought excess medications monthly and sufficient amount of drugs were added until the next refill date. Drugs were dispensed as usual in the control group. Total cost consisting of the cost of drugs, staff and building was calculated. Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at baseline and week-12. Adherence was measured based on pill counting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients aged 56.77 ± 14.67 years with 13.37 ± 7.36 years of diabetes participated. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. POMs minimized the total cost by 38.96% which translated to a cost saving of USD 42.76 ± 6.98, significantly different versus USD 0.02 ± 0.52 in the control group, p = 0.025. Mean HbA1c reduced significantly (-0.79%, p = 0.016) in the POMs group but not significant in the control group (-0.11%, p = 0.740). Medication adherence improved significantly in both groups at week-12 (p < 0.010). Nevertheless, patients in the POMs group were more adherent, 87.20% vs. 66.32%, p = 0.034.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilizing POMs resulted in cost saving, improved adherence and better glycaemic control. Use of POMs should be practiced in the outpatient pharmacy to reduce wastage and cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":10961,"journal":{"name":"Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences","volume":"29 1","pages":"125-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40199-021-00389-6","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-021-00389-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Millions worth of unused drugs particularly those indicated for chronic diseases such as diabetes were returned and disposed leading to substantial wastage. Use of patients' own medications (POMs) in the inpatient setting has reduced wastage and saved cost. The impact of utilizing POMs in the outpatient setting has hitherto not been determined.

Purpose: This study aims to compare the cost, medication adherence and glycaemic control of utilizing POMs versus usual dispensing.

Methods: Prospective randomized controlled study was conducted among diabetic patients that required monthly medication refill in the Outpatient Pharmacy in 2017. Patients who consented were equally divided into POMs and control groups. Both groups brought excess medications from home at week-0 and week-12. Patients in the POMs group brought excess medications monthly and sufficient amount of drugs were added until the next refill date. Drugs were dispensed as usual in the control group. Total cost consisting of the cost of drugs, staff and building was calculated. Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at baseline and week-12. Adherence was measured based on pill counting.

Results: Thirty patients aged 56.77 ± 14.67 years with 13.37 ± 7.36 years of diabetes participated. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. POMs minimized the total cost by 38.96% which translated to a cost saving of USD 42.76 ± 6.98, significantly different versus USD 0.02 ± 0.52 in the control group, p = 0.025. Mean HbA1c reduced significantly (-0.79%, p = 0.016) in the POMs group but not significant in the control group (-0.11%, p = 0.740). Medication adherence improved significantly in both groups at week-12 (p < 0.010). Nevertheless, patients in the POMs group were more adherent, 87.20% vs. 66.32%, p = 0.034.

Conclusion: Utilizing POMs resulted in cost saving, improved adherence and better glycaemic control. Use of POMs should be practiced in the outpatient pharmacy to reduce wastage and cost.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较成本,血糖控制和药物依从性利用病人自己的药物(POMs)与常规分配在门诊设置糖尿病患者。
背景:价值数百万美元的未使用药物,特别是用于糖尿病等慢性疾病的药物被退回和处置,导致大量浪费。在住院环境中使用患者自己的药物(POMs)减少了浪费并节省了成本。迄今为止,在门诊环境中使用POMs的影响尚未确定。目的:本研究旨在比较使用POMs与常规配药的成本、药物依从性和血糖控制。方法:对2017年在门诊药房每月需补药的糖尿病患者进行前瞻性随机对照研究。同意的患者平均分为pom组和对照组。两组人都在第0周和第12周从家里带了过量的药物。POMs组患者每月携带多余的药物,并在下次补充日期之前添加足够的药物。对照组照常给药。计算总成本,包括药品成本、人员成本和建筑成本。在基线和第12周测量糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。依从性是根据药片计数来衡量的。结果:30例患者年龄56.77±14.67岁,其中糖尿病患者年龄13.37±7.36岁。两组的基线特征相似。POMs将总成本降低了38.96%,节省了42.76±6.98美元,与对照组的0.02±0.52美元有显著差异,p = 0.025。POMs组平均HbA1c显著降低(-0.79%,p = 0.016),对照组无显著降低(-0.11%,p = 0.740)。两组患者用药依从性在第12周均有显著改善(p)。结论:使用POMs可节省费用,提高依从性,改善血糖控制。应在门诊药房推广使用POMs,以减少浪费和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Flavonoid as possible therapeutic targets against COVID-19: a scoping review of in silico studies. A rare case of phenobarbital-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Deciphering the similarities and disparities of molecular mechanisms behind respiratory epithelium response to HCoV-229E and SARS-CoV-2 and drug repurposing, a systems biology approach. Simulation of drug-drug interactions between breast cancer chemotherapeutic agents and antiemetic drugs. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to highlight an over-looked drug-drug interaction leading to imatinib treatment failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1