Management of Large Segmental Bone Defects at the Knee With Intramedullary Stabilized Antibiotic Spacers During Two-Stage Treatment of Endoprosthetic Joint Infection

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.026
Joseph A. Ippolito MD, Jennifer E. Thomson MD, Steven M. Rivero MD, Kathleen S. Beebe MD, Francis R. Patterson MD, Joseph Benevenia MD
{"title":"Management of Large Segmental Bone Defects at the Knee With Intramedullary Stabilized Antibiotic Spacers During Two-Stage Treatment of Endoprosthetic Joint Infection","authors":"Joseph A. Ippolito MD,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Thomson MD,&nbsp;Steven M. Rivero MD,&nbsp;Kathleen S. Beebe MD,&nbsp;Francis R. Patterson MD,&nbsp;Joseph Benevenia MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Following debridement<span><span> of infected prostheses that require reconstruction with an endoprosthetic replacement (EPR), instability related to segmental residual bone defects present a challenge in management with 2-stage </span>reimplantation.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for revision total joint or endoprosthetic infection at the knee from 1998 to 2018. At our institution, patients with skeletal defects &gt;6 cm following explant of prosthesis and debridement (stage 1) were managed with intramedullary nail-stabilized antibiotic spacers. Following stage 1, antimicrobial therapy included 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics and a minimum of 6 weeks of oral antibiotics. Following resolution of inflammatory markers and negative tissue cultures, reimplantation (stage 2) of an EPR was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one patients at a mean age of 54 ± 21 years were treated for prosthetic joint infection at the knee. Polymicrobial growth was detected in 38% of cases, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (24%) and <span><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em></span><span><span> (19%). Mean residual skeletal defect after stage 1 treatment was 20 cm. Prosthetic joint </span>infection eradication<span> was achieved in 18 (86%) patients, with a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 77% and mean knee range of motion of 100°. Patients with polymicrobial infections had a greater number of surgeries prior to infection (</span></span><em>P</em> = .024), and were more likely to require additional debridement prior to EPR (odds ratio 12.0, <em>P</em> = .048).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Management of large segmental skeletal defects at the knee following explant using intramedullary stabilized antibiotic spacers maintain stability and result in high rates of limb salvage with conversion to an endoprosthesis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"36 6","pages":"Pages 2165-2170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.026","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540321000449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Following debridement of infected prostheses that require reconstruction with an endoprosthetic replacement (EPR), instability related to segmental residual bone defects present a challenge in management with 2-stage reimplantation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for revision total joint or endoprosthetic infection at the knee from 1998 to 2018. At our institution, patients with skeletal defects >6 cm following explant of prosthesis and debridement (stage 1) were managed with intramedullary nail-stabilized antibiotic spacers. Following stage 1, antimicrobial therapy included 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics and a minimum of 6 weeks of oral antibiotics. Following resolution of inflammatory markers and negative tissue cultures, reimplantation (stage 2) of an EPR was performed.

Results

Twenty-one patients at a mean age of 54 ± 21 years were treated for prosthetic joint infection at the knee. Polymicrobial growth was detected in 38% of cases, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (24%) and Staphylococcus aureus (19%). Mean residual skeletal defect after stage 1 treatment was 20 cm. Prosthetic joint infection eradication was achieved in 18 (86%) patients, with a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 77% and mean knee range of motion of 100°. Patients with polymicrobial infections had a greater number of surgeries prior to infection (P = .024), and were more likely to require additional debridement prior to EPR (odds ratio 12.0, P = .048).

Conclusion

Management of large segmental skeletal defects at the knee following explant using intramedullary stabilized antibiotic spacers maintain stability and result in high rates of limb salvage with conversion to an endoprosthesis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在假体关节感染的两阶段治疗中,髓内稳定抗生素间隔剂治疗膝关节大节段骨缺损
背景:在感染性假体清创后,需要用假体内置换术(EPR)重建,与节段性残留骨缺损相关的不稳定性对两期再植的处理提出了挑战。方法回顾性分析1998年至2018年所有因翻修全关节或膝关节内假体感染而接受治疗的患者。在我们的机构,在假体移植和清创(一期)后出现6cm骨骼缺损的患者使用髓内钉稳定的抗生素间隔器进行治疗。在第一阶段之后,抗菌治疗包括6周静脉注射抗生素和至少6周口服抗生素。在炎症标记物和阴性组织培养消失后,进行EPR再植入术(第2阶段)。结果21例膝关节假体感染患者接受治疗,平均年龄54±21岁。38%的病例检测到多微生物生长,其次是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(24%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(19%)。一期治疗后平均骨骼缺损为20厘米。18例(86%)患者获得假体关节感染根除,平均肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分为77%,平均膝关节活动范围为100°。多微生物感染患者在感染前的手术次数较多(P = 0.024),并且更有可能在EPR前需要额外的清创(优势比12.0,P = 0.048)。结论应用髓内稳定型抗生素间隔剂治疗膝关节植骨术后大节段性骨缺损,可保持骨缺损的稳定性,并可获得较高的肢体保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Zonal fixation with Metaphyseal Sleeves in Reconstruction of Bone Defect in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Medicare's Impending Surgeon Payment for Arthroplasty Crisis: The Potential of Rapid Loss of Access for the Elderly. Editorial Board Masthead Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1