Revitalizing the typological approach: Some methods for finding types.

Q2 Psychology Journal for Person-Oriented Research Pub Date : 2017-11-01 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.17505/jpor.2017.04
Lars R Bergman, András Vargha, Zsuzsanna Kövi
{"title":"Revitalizing the typological approach: Some methods for finding types.","authors":"Lars R Bergman,&nbsp;András Vargha,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna Kövi","doi":"10.17505/jpor.2017.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose is to discuss and exemplify how a typological approach could be designed for studying phenomena believed to be best understood within a person-oriented theoretical framework. The focus is mainly restricted to the case of studying the typological structure of a sample at a single point in time, and restricted to analyzing variable profiles where each variable has a \"negative\" and \"positive\" endpoint. An artificial data set and an empirical data set were analyzed using two different methodological approaches, one more explorative (using LICUR, a cluster analysis-based procedure) and one more model-based (using the MCLUST procedure). For the artificial data set, the LICUR procedure was successful in finding the true classification structure but the MCLUST procedure performed surprisingly badly. For the empirical data set, both procedures produced rather similar solutions and they showed moderate validity. However, the LICUR solution appeared to be slightly superior. It was argued that applying a sound classification methodology and carefully validating the resulting classifications are extremely important, even more so in a developmental context. It was also argued that, in a number of situations, a more explorative approach could be more useful than a standard model-based one.</p>","PeriodicalId":36744,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Person-Oriented Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"49-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7869617/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Person-Oriented Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2017.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The purpose is to discuss and exemplify how a typological approach could be designed for studying phenomena believed to be best understood within a person-oriented theoretical framework. The focus is mainly restricted to the case of studying the typological structure of a sample at a single point in time, and restricted to analyzing variable profiles where each variable has a "negative" and "positive" endpoint. An artificial data set and an empirical data set were analyzed using two different methodological approaches, one more explorative (using LICUR, a cluster analysis-based procedure) and one more model-based (using the MCLUST procedure). For the artificial data set, the LICUR procedure was successful in finding the true classification structure but the MCLUST procedure performed surprisingly badly. For the empirical data set, both procedures produced rather similar solutions and they showed moderate validity. However, the LICUR solution appeared to be slightly superior. It was argued that applying a sound classification methodology and carefully validating the resulting classifications are extremely important, even more so in a developmental context. It was also argued that, in a number of situations, a more explorative approach could be more useful than a standard model-based one.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类型学方法的复兴:寻找类型的一些方法。
目的是讨论和举例说明如何设计类型学方法来研究在以人为本的理论框架内被认为是最好理解的现象。重点主要局限于研究单个时间点样本的类型结构的情况,局限于分析每个变量都有“负”和“正”端点的变量剖面。人工数据集和经验数据集使用两种不同的方法进行分析,一种是探索性的(使用LICUR,基于聚类分析的程序),另一种是基于模型的(使用MCLUST程序)。对于人工数据集,LICUR程序成功地找到了真实的分类结构,但MCLUST程序表现得非常糟糕。对于经验数据集,这两种方法产生了相当相似的解决方案,它们显示出适度的有效性。然而,LICUR溶液似乎略显优越。有人认为,采用一种合理的分类方法和仔细核实所产生的分类是极其重要的,在发展的背景下更是如此。还有人认为,在许多情况下,一种更具探索性的方法可能比基于标准模型的方法更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Person-Oriented Research
Journal for Person-Oriented Research Psychology-Psychology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Further Critical Reflections on the Notion of a "Population Psychology". Meaning Matters: A Person-Centered Investigation of Meaning in Life, Future Time Perspective, and Well-Being in Young Adults. Transitions and Resilience in Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Multiple Single-Case Study. The 10th yearly volume of JPOR is complete. Comment on Lundh (2023)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1